Advertisement

What Is the Difference? Young Children Learning Mathematics Through Problem Solving

  • Hanna PalmérEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reports on a design research study where young children were taught mathematics through problem solving. In the study, a sequence of five problem-solving lessons was conducted in two Swedish preschool classes with children, aged approximately 6 years. This chapter utilizes interviews made with the children after the problem-solving lessons. The lessons in the study were categorized as work by the children, though with some differences from how they usually worked. The differences emphasized by the children were that they had worked together with their classmates, thought a lot, and used manipulatives rather than textbooks. Further, they emphasized that they were surprised by the outcomes many times. At the same time as these answers say something about the problem-solving lessons, they also say something about the ordinary mathematics teaching in these preschool classes. The results emphasize the need to discuss how much and, especially, in which way young children are to be taught mathematics.

Keywords

Primary School Mathematics Teaching Preschool Teacher Mathematics Task Design Research Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agency for School Improvement. (2004). Rapportering av regeringsuppdrag ‘Integration förskola, förskoleklass, grundskola och fritidshem—Att bygga broar’ (Report of government mandate ‘Integration preschool, elementary school and recreation centers—Building bridges’). Dnr. 2003:171.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Björklund, C. (2013). What counts in preschool? Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, J. (2010). Commentary on problem solving heuristics, affect, and discrete mathematics: A representational discussion. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education. Seeking new frontiers (pp. 251–258). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood. Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academics.Google Scholar
  8. English, L. (2004a). Mathematical and analogical reasoning in early childhood. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. English, L. (2004b). Promoting the development of young children’s mathematical and analogical reasoning. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners (pp. 201–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early mathematics education and how to do it. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development & early education. Research to practice (pp. 403–428). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, K., Marcus, R., McLaren, K., & Fey, J. (2001). Curriculum materials supporting problem-based teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 101(6), 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–799). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age.Google Scholar
  13. Lester, F. K., & Lambdin, D. (2007). Undervisa genom problemlösning (Teach through problem solving). In J. Boesen (Ed.), Lära och undervisa i matematik—internationella perspektiv (Learn and teach mathematics—international perspectives) (pp. 95–108). Göteborg: NCM.Google Scholar
  14. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age.Google Scholar
  16. Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2008). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 75–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. SOU. (2004:97). Att lyfta matematiken: intresse, kunskap, kompetens. Matematikdeligationens betänkande (Lifting mathematics: interest, knowledge, competence. The report of the mathematics delegation). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  18. Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268–275.Google Scholar
  19. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2010). Curriculum for the preschool Lpfö98. Revised 2010. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.Google Scholar
  21. The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  22. The Swedish National Agency for Education. (2014). Preschool class—Assignment, content and quality. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.Google Scholar
  23. The Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2009). Undervisningen i matematik—utbildningens innehåll och ändamålsenlighet (The teaching of mathematics—The content and the effectiveness of the education). Kvalitetsgranskning rapport 2009:5. Skolinspektionen: Stockholm.Google Scholar
  24. Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Tabach, M., & Barkai, R. (2014). Developing preschool teachers, knowledge of students’ number conceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wing, L. A. (1995). Play is not the work of the child: Young children’s perceptions of work and play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wyndhamn, J., Riesbeck, E., & Schoultz, J. (2000). Problemlösning som metafor och praktik (Problem solving as a metaphor and practice). Lindköping: Linköpings Universitet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations