Skip to main content

Exploiting Traceability Uncertainty Between Software Architectural Models and Performance Analysis Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Architecture (ECSA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9278))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While software architecture performance analysis is a well-studied field, it is less understood how the analysis results (i.e., mean values, variances, and/or probability distributions) trace back to the architectural model elements (i.e., software components, interactions among components, deployment nodes). Yet, understanding this traceability is critical for understanding the analysis result in context of the architecture. The goal of this paper is to automate the traceability between software architectural models and performance analysis results by investigating the uncertainty while bridging these two domains. Our approach makes use of performance antipatterns to deduce the logical consequences between the architectural elements and analysis results and automatically build a graph of traces to identify the most critical causes of performance flaws. We developed a tool that jointly considers SOftware and PErformance concepts (SoPeTraceAnalyzer), and it automatically builds model-to-results traceability links. The benefit of the tool is illustrated by means of a case study in the e-health domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smith, C.U., Woodside, M.: Performance validation at early stages of software development. In: System Performance Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications. CRC Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cortellessa, V., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P.: Model-Based Software Performance Analysis. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghabi, A., Egyed, A.: Exploiting traceability uncertainty between architectural models and code. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP WICSA/ECSA. pp. 171–180 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: More new software antipatterns: even more ways to shoot yourself in the foot. In: International CMG Conference, pp. 717–725 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cortellessa, V., Di Marco, A., Trubiani, C.: An approach for modeling and detecting software performance antipatterns based on first-order logics. Software and System Modeling 13, 391–432 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trubiani, C., Ghabi, A., Egyed, A.: (SoPeTraceAnalyzer). http://www.sea.uni-linz.ac.at/tools/TraZer/SoPeTraceAnalyzer.zip

  8. Woodside, C.M., Franks, G., Petriu, D.C.: The future of software performance engineering. In: Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering FOSE, pp. 171–187 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cortellessa, V., Di Marco, A., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A., Trubiani, C.: Digging into UML models to remove performance antipatterns. In: ICSE Workshop QUOVADIS, pp. 9–16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cortellessa, V., De Sanctis, M., Di Marco, A., Trubiani, C.: Enabling performance antipatterns to arise from an adl-based software architecture. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference WICSA/ECSA, pp. 310–314 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trubiani, C., Koziolek, A., Cortellessa, V., Reussner, R.: Guilt-based handling of software performance antipatterns in palladio architectural models. Journal of Systems and Software 95, 141–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Antoniol, G.: Design-code traceability recovery: selecting the basic linkage properties. Science of Computer Programming 40, 213–234 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Egyed, A., Grunbacher, P.: Automating requirements traceability: beyond the record & replay paradigm. In: International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pp. 163–171. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cleland-Huang, J., Settimi, R., Romanova, E., Berenbach, B., Clark, S.: Best practices for automated traceability. Computer 40, 27–35 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghabi, A., Egyed, A.: Exploiting traceability uncertainty among artifacts and code. accepted for Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) (to appear, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fritzsche, M., Johannes, J., Zschaler, S., Zherebtsov, A., Terekhov, E.: Application of tracing techniques in model-driven performance engineering. In: European Conference on Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications (ECMDA-FA) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petriu, D.B., Amyot, D., Woodside, C.M., Jiang, B.: Traceability and evaluation in scenario analysis by use case maps. In: Leue, S., Systä, T.J. (eds.) Scenarios: Models, Transformations and Tools. LNCS, vol. 3466, pp. 134–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Alhaj, M., Petriu, D.C.: Traceability links in model transformations between software and performance models. In: Khendek, F., Toeroe, M., Gherbi, A., Reed, R. (eds.) SDL 2013. LNCS, vol. 7916, pp. 203–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Whittle, J., Sawyer, P., Bencomo, N., Cheng, B.H.C., Bruel, J.: Relax: Incorporating uncertainty into the specification of self-adaptive systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 79–88 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Esfahani, N., Malek, S., Razavi, K.: Guidearch: guiding the exploration of architectural solution space under uncertainty. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 43–52 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Letier, E., Stefan, D., Barr, E.T.: Uncertainty, risk, and information value in software requirements and architecture. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 883–894 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Trubiani, C.: Antipattern-based model refactoring for software performance improvement. In: International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA), pp. 33–42 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jain, R.: The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 19, 5–11 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Clements, P.C., Garlan, D., Little, R., Nord, R.L., Stafford, J.A.: Documenting software architectures: views and beyond. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 740–741 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cortellessa, V., Mirandola, R.: Prima-uml: a performance validation incremental methodology on early uml diagrams. Sci. Comput. Program. 44, 101–129 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Casale, G., Serazzi, G.: Quantitative system evaluation with java modeling tools. In: International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE), pp. 449–454 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, C.U.: Introduction to software performance engineering: origins and outstanding problems. In: Bernardo, M., Hillston, J. (eds.) SFM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4486, pp. 395–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Gotel, O., Cleland-Huang, J., Hayes, J.H., Zisman, A., Egyed, A., Grünbacher, P., Antoniol, G.: The quest for ubiquity: a roadmap for software and systems traceability research. In: IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 71–80 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Franks, G., Petriu, D.C., Woodside, C.M., Xu, J., Tregunno, P.: Layered bottlenecks and their mitigation. In: International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST), pp. 103–114 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aleti, A., Buhnova, B., Grunske, L., Koziolek, A., Meedeniya, I.: Software architecture optimization methods: A systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 39, 658–683 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catia Trubiani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trubiani, C., Ghabi, A., Egyed, A. (2015). Exploiting Traceability Uncertainty Between Software Architectural Models and Performance Analysis Results. In: Weyns, D., Mirandola, R., Crnkovic, I. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9278. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23727-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23727-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23726-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23727-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics