Skip to main content

Reading the Signs of Sustainability in Christian Higher Education: Symbolic Value Claims or Substantive Organizational Change?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Higher Education for Sustainability

Part of the book series: Management and Industrial Engineering ((MINEN))

  • 1369 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I examine campus sustainability and climate activism in U.S. religious higher education. I use social movement perspectives from sociology to assess its organizational boundaries and cultural foundations in a case study featuring the Consortium of Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU). Signals of campus sustainability among them are weak from institutionalized higher education data reporting sources. Stronger signals of sustainability come from direct campus surveys by student-led religious environmental movement organizations. Growing campus climate activism and leadership by students, faculty, and administrators also appears on these conservative Christian colleges and universities. Their discourse about the meaning of sustainability, strategies for implementing it, and its rationale differs significantly from secular advocates of sustainability in higher education. Little mention of climate change appears in it. Furthermore, their justification for campus sustainability is framed almost exclusively within religious terms. Overall, I find in this exploratory analysis that the prevalence of campus sustainability initiatives among CCCU schools is underreported, but still minimal. Some barriers to expanding it reflect the particular subculture of U.S. conservative Protestants. Others are shared with challenges secular campuses face when implementing organizational change for sustainability. Opportunity for building bridges to overcome them begins in better understanding these conservative Christian campuses’ religious framing of sustainability values and their organizational cultures. Given the larger societal and political context of climate change in the U.S., however, this requires greater engagement of secular advocates of sustainability in higher education and climate activists. The value this holds for addressing climate change’s possible impacts and reducing its human contributions comes from how this sector of higher education educates many future leaders of this influential conservative religious segment of U.S. society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    YECA defines “young evangelical” as 30 years or younger.

  2. 2.

    Other signatories include current and former leaders in Christian higher education from provosts (John D. Yordy, Ph.D., Goshen College) and theological seminary presidents (Dr. Ron Benefiel, Nazarene Theological Seminary; Rev. Paul de Vries, Ph.D., New York Divinity School; Rev. Timothy George, Ph.D. Founding Dean, Beeson Divinity School, Samford University; Rev. Dr. Jeffrey E. Greenway, former president, Asbury Theological Seminary; Richard Mouw, Ph.D., Fuller Theological Seminary; John E. Phelan, Jr., president, North Park Theological Seminary), as well as past and emeritus CCCU presidents (Paul Corts and Robert Andringa, Ph.D., respectively). Current presidents of CCCU “Member” and “Affiliate” schools also are among the ECI signatories, and include many more than appear on the ACUPCC active signatory list.

  3. 3.

    The American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) “recognizes the unique responsibility that institutions of higher education have as role models for their communities and in educating the people who will develop the social, economic and technological solutions to reverse global warming and help create a thriving, civil and sustainable society.”

  4. 4.

    Search criteria and results: http://www.aashe.org/membership/member-directory?keyword=&field_organization_type_value_many_to_one%5B%5D=Four+Year+Institution&country%5B%5D=us&province=.

  5. 5.

    STARS 2.0 “Basic Access” limited benefits: “Access to the online STARS Reporting Tool to measure your institutions current sustainability performance and create a baseline for continuous improvement; Streamline your sustainability reporting efforts by sharing STARS reporting data with other organizations (e.g. Sierra Magazine and The Princeton Review); and Option to publicly share your institutions sustainability data and achieve recognition as a STARS Reporter.”

  6. 6.

    Second Nature currently directs the ACUPCC and hosts its web presence. Its LinkedIn company page identifies it as a Boston-based nonprofit organization founded in 1993, and states “that in order for society to move in a sustainable direction, higher education must develop a new framework in which the sector and individual institutions operate as a [sic] full integrated communities that teach, research, and model social and ecological sustainability.” Its mission “is to proactively build a sustainable and positive global future through initiating bold commitments, scaling successful actions, and accelerating innovative solutions among leadership networks in higher education” SecondNature (2013). “Second Nature: Education for Sustainability”. vol. 2015. Boston MA: Second Nature, Inc.

  7. 7.

    A much smaller association of 13 conservative Protestant schools known as the Christian College Consortium (CCC) also exists within the CCCU. It includes: Asbury University, Bethel University, George Fox University, Gordon College, Greenville College, Houghton College, Malone University, Messiah College, Seattle Pacific University, Taylor University, Trinity International University, Westmont College, and Wheaton College CCC (2015). “Christian College Consortium”. vol. 2015. Wenham MA: Christian College Consortium.

  8. 8.

    “A [CCCU] member institution meets five requirements: (1) It is a nonprofit, North American institution with non-probationary regional accreditation (or the Canadian equivalent) that offers comprehensive undergraduate curricula rooted in the arts and sciences; (2) It has a Christian mission statement and integrates Biblical faith into its educational programs; (3) It has an institutional policy and practice to hire only persons who profess faith in Jesus Christ as full-time faculty members and administrators; (4) It is committed to advancing the cause of Christian higher education and is supportive of other Christian colleges and universities; and (5) It operates under the standards of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability.” CCCU (2015). “Members & Affiliates”. vol. 2015. Washington DC: Council for Christian Colleges & Universities.

  9. 9.

    *CCCU school sustainability office or organizational account, ^student sustainability organization or club account.

  10. 10.

    These include: ACU, APU, Bethel, Calvin, EMU, Gordon, Goshen, Houghton, IWU, JBU, Messiah, PLNU, SPU, Trevecca, Trinity, Whitworth.

  11. 11.

    Greatest number of sustainability-dedicated web pages: ACU, Calvin, EMU, Gordon, Houghton, JBU, Messiah, PLNU, SPU, Whitworth.

References

  • AASHE. (2015a). AASHE member directory (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHE. (2015b). About AASHE (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACUPCC. (2015a). Mission and history (Vol. 2015). American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACUPCC. (2015b). Reporting institutions (Vol. 2015). American Colleges & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACUPCC. (2015c). Who’s who (Vol. 2015). American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment.

    Google Scholar 

  • AESS. (2015). Evangelical climate initiative (ECI) (Vol. 2015). www.aesonline.org. Academy of Evangelical Scientists and Ethicists.

  • Austin, A. (2002). Advancing accumulation and managing its discontents: The U.S. anti environmental countermovement. Sociological Spectrum, 22, 71–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A., & Phoenix, L. (2005). The neoconservative assault on the earth: The environmental imperialism of the bush administration. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J. G. (2010). Global warming and the risen LORD: Christian discipleship and climate change. Washington, D.C.: Evangelical Environmental Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, R. (2010). The making of evangelicalism: From revivalism to politics and beyond. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D. (1993). You could be the hundredth monkey: Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma-Prediger, S. (2010). For the beauty of the earth: A christian vision for creation care. In W. A. Dyrness & R. K. Johnston (Eds.), Grand rapids. MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. R. (2008). Our father’s world: Mobilizing the church to care for creation. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Craig Jenkins, J. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, S., & Benson, M. (1993). Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations. Social Problems, 40, 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. A. (2010). The faithful skeptics: Conservative Christian religious beliefs and perceptions of climate change. M.A. Thesis, Society and Conservation, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCC. (2015). Christian college consortium (Vol. 2015). Wenham, MA: Christian College Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCCU. (2015). Members and affiliates (Vol. 2015). Washington, D.C.: Council for Christian Colleges & Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, D. (2014). TIME 100 pioneers: Katharine hayhoe. TIME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizik, R. (2013a). Natural disasters, climate change, and the “burn it all downers”. The New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizik, R. (2013b). Natural disasters, climate change, and the ‘burn it all downers’. In On faith. The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1992). American environmentalism: The U.S. movement, 1970–1990. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. C. I. (2006). Climate change: An evangelical call to action. Evangelical Climate Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. C. I. (2007). Principles for federal policy on climate change. Washington, D.C.: The Evangelical Climate Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. N. (1994). On the care of creation. Evangelical Environmental Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. N. (2004). The sandy cove covenant and invitation (Vol. 2013). Earthcare, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. N. (2006). Christians and climate (Vol. 2015). Evangelical Environmental Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECI. (2006). Climate change: An evangelical call to action. Evangelical Environmental Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. (2014). Religious communities, science, scientists, and perceptions: A comprehensive survey. In Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. L., & Moseley, L. (2003). Faith-based environmental initiatives in Appalachia: Connecting faith, environmental concern and reform. Worldviews, 7, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. F. (1995). The greening of protestant thought. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R., Gramling, R., & Davidson, D. J. (2008). Scientific certainity argumentation methods (SCAMS): Science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry, 78, 2–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. C., Rozell, M. J., & Wilcox, C. (2003). The Christian right in American politics: Marching to the millenium. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI. (2015). The green seminary initiative (Vol. 2015) www.greenseminaries.org. The Theological School at Drew University.

  • Guth, J. L., Green, J. C., Kellstedt, L. A., & Smidt, C. E. (1995). Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, J. L., Kellstedt, L. A., Smidt, C. E., & Green, J. C. (1993). Theological perspectives and environmentalism among religious activists. Journal of Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, K., & Farley, A. (2009). A climate for change: Global warmings for faith-based decisions. New York: FaithWords.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of sceptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. R. I. (2002). Oxford declaration on global warming. John Ray Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. P., Cox, D., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2014). Believers, sympathizers, & skeptics: Why Americans are conflicted about climate change, environmental policy, and science. Washington, D.C.: Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, C. (2013). ‘Blessing the facts,’ evangelical scientists urge Congress to reduce carbon emissions. In ClimateWire, E&E Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net: E&E Publishing.

  • Kearns, L. (1996). Saving the creation: Christian environmentalism in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 57, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, L. (1997). Noah’s ark goes to Washington: A profile of Evangelical environmentalism. Social Compass, 44, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogman, N. T. (1996). Frame disputes in environmental controversies: The case of wetlands regulations in Louisiana. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LCCN. (2012). Lausanne global consultation on creation care and the gospel. In T. L. Movement (Ed), Jamaica creation care consultation (Vol. 2015). St. Ann, Jamaica: The Lausanne Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015). Climate change in the American Christian mind: March, 2015. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, G. H. (2004). Caring for creation: Investigating faith-based environmentalism in four congregations. Environmental studies program. Eugene: University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. M. (2007). Faith in the halls of power: How Evangelicals joined the American elite. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. M. (2008). Evangelicals in the power Elite: Elite cohesion advancing a movement. American Sociological Review, 73, 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D. R. (2008). Thinking about social problems. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B. (2015). The gospel call to creation care (01/30/2015). Wheaton, IL: Wheaton College.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. N. G. C. (2009). Declaration on creation Stewardship and climate change. In Micah network fourth triennial global consultation. Limuru, Kenya: Micah Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, B., & Munro, I. (2012). Information warfare and new organizational landscapes: An inquiry into the exxonmobil-greenpeace dispute over climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1507–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In D. McAdam., & W. R. Scott (Eds), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M. (2009). The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the U.S. general public. Hofstra Law Review, 37, 1017–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011a). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011b). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertig, A. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (1995). Public approval of environmental protection and other new social movement goals in Western Europe and the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. A. E. (2004). For the health of the nation: An evangelical call to civic responsibility (Vol. 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. A. E. (2007). An urgent call to action: Scientists and evangelicals unite to protect creation (Vol. 2013). PBS NOW.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. A. E. (2011). Loving the least of these: Addressing a changing environment. National Association of Evangelicals, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. R. C. (2012). Climate and social stress: Implications for security analysis. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, K. M. (2006). People want to protect themselves a little bit: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 372–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Wood P. W. (2015). Sustainability: Higher education’s new fundamentalism. National Association of Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (2006). Little consensus on global warming. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (2009). Economy, jobs trump all other policy priorities in 2009. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton. (2015). 2015 Guide to 353 Green Colleges. In Green college guide (Vol. 2015). Natick: The Princeton Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • RENEWAL. (2010). The green awakenings report 2010: Stories of stewardship and sustainability from the next generation. Renewal.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. B. C. (2008). A Southern baptist declaration on the environment and climate change. Southern Baptist Environment & Climate Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. H., Semenov, S., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Magadza, C. H. D., Oppenheimer, M., et al. (2007). Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of the Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 779–810). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SecondNature. (2013). Second nature: Education for sustainability (Vol. 2015). Boston MA: Second Nature, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaiko, R. G. (1987). Religion, politics, and environmental concern: A powerful mix of passions. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 244–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibley, M. A., & Wiggins, J. L. (1997). The greening of Mainline American religion: A sociological analysis of the environmental ethics of the National religious partnership for the environment. Social Compass, 44, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra. (2014a). Cool schools 2014: The full ranking (Vol. 2015). Sierra Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra. (2014b). Ten coolest schools (Vol. 2015). Sierra Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra. (2015). Cool schools 2014: Methodology (Vol. 2015). Sierra Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, C. E. (2013). American evangelicals today. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SSA. (2015). Seminary stewardship alliance (Vol. 2015) www.seminaryalliance.org. Blessed Earth.

  • STARS. (2015a). Register for STARS (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • STARS. (2015b). STARS overview (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • STARS. (2015c). STARS participants and reports (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • STARS. (2015d). The sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system™ (STARS) (Vol. 20151). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • STARS. (2015e). Why participate in STARS? (Vol. 2015). Philadelphia, PA: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, M. R. (1997). Protestantism, capitalism, and nature in America. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. C. W. E. (2010). The Cape Town commitment: A confession of faith and a call to action. In The third Lausanne congress on world evangelization. Cape Town, South Africa: Lausanne Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. E. A. (2008). On the care of creation. In 2008 world evangelical alliance general assembly. Pattaya, Thailand: World Evangelical Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, A. (2014). YECA prays for & participates in the people’s climate march (Vol. 2015). YECAaction.org: Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker, J. A., Petersen, A. C., & van der Sluijis, J. P. (2009). Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Global Environmental Change, 19, 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (2014). What would Jesus do (about climate change)? In The Boston (Ed.), Globe. Boston: Boston Globe Media Partners LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2014). Evangelical climate initiative (Vol. 2015). Wikipedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, C., & Larson, C. (2006). Onward christian soldiers: The religious right in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K. K. (2012). Between god and green: How Evangelicals are cultivating a middle ground on climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Will, G. F. (2010). Global warming advocates ignore the boulders. In Washington post. The Washington Post Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, G. F. (2015a). Climate change’s instructive past. Washington post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, G. F. (2015b). ‘Sustainability’ gone mad on college campuses. Washington post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womersley, M. W. (2002). A peculiarly American green: Religion and environmental policy in the United States. School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2012a). Call to action (video) (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2012b). Call to action (web page) (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2012c). It starts with us: Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.” Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2013a). Christians and the climate crisis spring 2013 tour in review. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2013b). Senior leader response—Dan Boone, president of Trevecca Nazarene University. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2014a). Climate leadership fellow—Dugan Julian, Iraq War veteran. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2014b). Letter to the National Association of Evangelicals for climate leadership (Vol. 2015) www.yecaction.org. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015a). Climate prayer U.S. (Vol. 2015): Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015b). Climate testimony: Caeden Tinklenberg (Iowa Republican)—Dordt College. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015c). Confronting climate change In DR Congo. Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YouTube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015d). Organizers: Climate leadership fellows (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YECAaction.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015e). Partners: The evangelical environmental network (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015f). Resources: Toolkits for download (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YECAaction.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015g). Tour stop hosting toolkit (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YECAaction.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015h). What we do: Young evangelicals for climate action (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015i). Who we are: Steering committee (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YECAaction.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. E. C. A. (2015j). Why Christians care about climate change (Vol. 2015). Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, YECAaction.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N. (2000). Ideologically structured action: An enlarged agenda for social movement research. Mobilization, 5, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Routhe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Routhe, A. (2016). Reading the Signs of Sustainability in Christian Higher Education: Symbolic Value Claims or Substantive Organizational Change?. In: Davim, J., Leal Filho, W. (eds) Challenges in Higher Education for Sustainability. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23705-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23705-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23704-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23705-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics