Abstract
Pharmaceutical drug substances and drug products are manufactured following a well-defined process in units of batches. Drug product batches consist of a large number of dosage units (tablets, capsules, patches, syringes, vials, etc.) Such processes have inherent variability in critical quality attributes (CQA) as a consequence of incipient differences in starting materials, environmental conditions, equipment control setting and other uncontrolled sources of variability at both the batch and dosage unit levels. Regulatory and business considerations intended to safeguard patient health, require careful statistical monitoring of the batch’s CQAs. Adherence to specifications of every batch of drug product is a regulatory requirement for marketing. This chapter summarizes the statistical methods used to carry out the statistical characterization of the manufacturing process’s ability to consistently produce acceptable product (process capability) and associated monitoring tools (statistical process control). For reporting purposes, a process capability index (e.g. Cpk) or process performance index (e.g. Ppk) is calculated based on two quantities: (1) the variability of the CQA (standard deviation, σ), and (2) the comparison of that variability with the specification, typically as the quotient of the specification width to 6σ. Statistical process control refers to graphical methods that permit detection of departures from target over time of manufacture by revealing process shifts greater than capability or inherent variability alone would allow. Details of these charts are described along with additional rules for increased vigilance in detecting assignable causes (beyond capability) of variation. Alternative charts for serially correlated data are also shown, and recommendations for the use of these tools in practical applications and for reporting quality indices are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson AC (1985) Plots, transformation and regression. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Box GEP, Luceño A (2000) Statistical control by monitoring and feedback adjustment. Wiley, New York
Box GEP, Paniagua-Quiñones Luceño M (2009) Statistical control by monitoring and feedback adjustment, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Deming WE (2000) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Freund RA (1957) Acceptance control charts. Ind Qual Control 14(4):13–23
Grant EL, Leavenworth RS (1996) Statistical quality control, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hare LB (2003) From chaos to wiping the floor. Qual Prog 53–63
Hare LB (2007) The Ubiquitous Cpk. Qual Prog 72–73
Hare LB (2013a) Follow the rules. Qual Prog 56–57
Hare LB (2013b) Wanderlust and memory. Qual Prog 52–53
Hunter JS (1989) One point plot equivalent to the Shewhart chart with western electric rules. Qual Eng 2:13–19
JMP®, Version 11. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007
Juran JM (1992) Juran on Quality by Design. The Free Press, New York, NY
Juran JM, DeFeo JA (2010) Quality control handbook, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
LeBlond D, Schofield T, Altan S (2005) Revisiting the notion of singlet testing requirements. Pharm Technol 29:85–86
Lucas J, Saccucci M (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32:1–12
Montgomery DC (2000) Introduction to statistical quality control, 7th edn. Wiley, New York, NY
Nelson L (1984) The Shewhart control chart – tests for special causes. J Qual Technol 16:238–239
Ott ER, Neubauer DV, Schilling EG (2000) Process control: troubleshooting and interpretation of data. McGraw Hill, New York, NY
Peterson JJ, Yahyah M (2009) A Bayesian design space approach to robustness and system suitability for pharmaceutical assays and other processes. Stat Biopharm Res 1(4):441–449
Read C (2006) Ranges. In: Balakrishnan N et al (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 6899–6902
Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1:239–250
Shewhart WA (1980) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee (republished). Van Nostrand, New York, 1931
Torbeck L (2011) Statistics in the service of quality. Pharm Technol 35(6):34
Woodcock J (2013) Interview with Dr. Janet Woodcock. Angle: US Life Science Industry, June 2013. http://www.nnepharmaplan.com/insights/angle-magazine/us-life-science-industry/articles/interview-with-dr-janet-woodcock-director-cder-fda/
Woodcock J, Wosinska M (2013) Economic and technological drivers of generic sterile injectable drug shortages. Clin Pharm Ther 93(2):170–176, http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v93/n2/pdf/clpt2012220a.pdf
Regulatory, Compendial and Standards Guidances
FDA Documents 21 CFR 210 and 211 cGMP in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding of Drugs and Finished Pharmaceuticals
• 21 CFR 600 Biological Products: General
• 21 CFR 820 Quality Systems Regulations
• Guidance for Industry: Investigating Out-of-Specification Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production (FDA, Oct. 2006)
• Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices (FDA, Jan. 2011)
ICH harmonized quality guidelines available online at www.ich.org:
• Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 1997
• Q6A Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances, 2000
• Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnology/Biological Products, 1999
• Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, 2001
• Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development
• Q9 Quality Risk Management.
• Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System
• Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances.
Compendial references
• USP, Guide to General Chapters:
• <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units
• <1010> Analytical Data–Interpretation and Treatment
Standards references
• ANSI/ASQ Z1.9–2003 (R2013), “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Nonconforming”, Milwaukee, WI http://asq.org/quality-press/display-item/index.html?item=T965
• ASTM Standard E2709, 2012, “Standard Practice for Demonstrating Capability to Comply with an Acceptance Procedure”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, DOI 10.1520/E2709-12, www.astm.org.
• ISO 7870 Control charts – Part 1 (General guidelines, 2014), Part 2 (Shewhart charts. 2013), Part 3 (Acceptance control charts, 2012). International Standard, Geneva. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:7870:-1:ed-2:v1:en
• ISO 22541 Statistical Methods in process management – Capability and Performance. Part 1 (General Principles and Concepts, 2009), Part 2 (Process capability and performance of time-dependent process models. 2013), Part 4 (Process capability estimates and performance measures, 2007). International Standard, Geneva http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=64135
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Altan, S., Hare, L., Strickland, H. (2016). Process Capability and Statistical Process Control. In: Zhang, L. (eds) Nonclinical Statistics for Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23558-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23558-5_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23557-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23558-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)