Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

Pharmaceutical drug substances and drug products are manufactured following a well-defined process in units of batches. Drug product batches consist of a large number of dosage units (tablets, capsules, patches, syringes, vials, etc.) Such processes have inherent variability in critical quality attributes (CQA) as a consequence of incipient differences in starting materials, environmental conditions, equipment control setting and other uncontrolled sources of variability at both the batch and dosage unit levels. Regulatory and business considerations intended to safeguard patient health, require careful statistical monitoring of the batch’s CQAs. Adherence to specifications of every batch of drug product is a regulatory requirement for marketing. This chapter summarizes the statistical methods used to carry out the statistical characterization of the manufacturing process’s ability to consistently produce acceptable product (process capability) and associated monitoring tools (statistical process control). For reporting purposes, a process capability index (e.g. Cpk) or process performance index (e.g. Ppk) is calculated based on two quantities: (1) the variability of the CQA (standard deviation, σ), and (2) the comparison of that variability with the specification, typically as the quotient of the specification width to 6σ. Statistical process control refers to graphical methods that permit detection of departures from target over time of manufacture by revealing process shifts greater than capability or inherent variability alone would allow. Details of these charts are described along with additional rules for increased vigilance in detecting assignable causes (beyond capability) of variation. Alternative charts for serially correlated data are also shown, and recommendations for the use of these tools in practical applications and for reporting quality indices are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson AC (1985) Plots, transformation and regression. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Luceño A (2000) Statistical control by monitoring and feedback adjustment. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Paniagua-Quiñones Luceño M (2009) Statistical control by monitoring and feedback adjustment, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (2000) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund RA (1957) Acceptance control charts. Ind Qual Control 14(4):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant EL, Leavenworth RS (1996) Statistical quality control, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare LB (2003) From chaos to wiping the floor. Qual Prog 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare LB (2007) The Ubiquitous Cpk. Qual Prog 72–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare LB (2013a) Follow the rules. Qual Prog 56–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare LB (2013b) Wanderlust and memory. Qual Prog 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JS (1989) One point plot equivalent to the Shewhart chart with western electric rules. Qual Eng 2:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JMP®, Version 11. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1992) Juran on Quality by Design. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM, DeFeo JA (2010) Quality control handbook, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlond D, Schofield T, Altan S (2005) Revisiting the notion of singlet testing requirements. Pharm Technol 29:85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas J, Saccucci M (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2000) Introduction to statistical quality control, 7th edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson L (1984) The Shewhart control chart – tests for special causes. J Qual Technol 16:238–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott ER, Neubauer DV, Schilling EG (2000) Process control: troubleshooting and interpretation of data. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JJ, Yahyah M (2009) A Bayesian design space approach to robustness and system suitability for pharmaceutical assays and other processes. Stat Biopharm Res 1(4):441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read C (2006) Ranges. In: Balakrishnan N et al (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 6899–6902

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart WA (1980) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee (republished). Van Nostrand, New York, 1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbeck L (2011) Statistics in the service of quality. Pharm Technol 35(6):34

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock J (2013) Interview with Dr. Janet Woodcock. Angle: US Life Science Industry, June 2013. http://www.nnepharmaplan.com/insights/angle-magazine/us-life-science-industry/articles/interview-with-dr-janet-woodcock-director-cder-fda/

  • Woodcock J, Wosinska M (2013) Economic and technological drivers of generic sterile injectable drug shortages. Clin Pharm Ther 93(2):170–176, http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v93/n2/pdf/clpt2012220a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Regulatory, Compendial and Standards Guidances

  • FDA Documents 21 CFR 210 and 211 cGMP in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding of Drugs and Finished Pharmaceuticals

    Google Scholar 

  • • 21 CFR 600 Biological Products: General

    Google Scholar 

  • • 21 CFR 820 Quality Systems Regulations

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidance for Industry: Investigating Out-of-Specification Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production (FDA, Oct. 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices (FDA, Jan. 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH harmonized quality guidelines available online at www.ich.org:

  • • Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q6A Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnology/Biological Products, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q9 Quality Risk Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System

    Google Scholar 

  • • Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compendial references

    Google Scholar 

  • USP, Guide to General Chapters:

    Google Scholar 

  • <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units

    Google Scholar 

  • <1010> Analytical Data–Interpretation and Treatment

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards references

    Google Scholar 

  • • ANSI/ASQ Z1.9–2003 (R2013), “Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Nonconforming”, Milwaukee, WI http://asq.org/quality-press/display-item/index.html?item=T965

  • • ASTM Standard E2709, 2012, “Standard Practice for Demonstrating Capability to Comply with an Acceptance Procedure”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, DOI 10.1520/E2709-12, www.astm.org.

  • ISO 7870 Control charts – Part 1 (General guidelines, 2014), Part 2 (Shewhart charts. 2013), Part 3 (Acceptance control charts, 2012). International Standard, Geneva. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:7870:-1:ed-2:v1:en

  • ISO 22541 Statistical Methods in process management – Capability and Performance. Part 1 (General Principles and Concepts, 2009), Part 2 (Process capability and performance of time-dependent process models. 2013), Part 4 (Process capability estimates and performance measures, 2007). International Standard, Geneva http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=64135

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stan Altan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Altan, S., Hare, L., Strickland, H. (2016). Process Capability and Statistical Process Control. In: Zhang, L. (eds) Nonclinical Statistics for Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23558-5_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics