Skip to main content

Connections Between Statistical Thinking and Critical Thinking: A Case Study

  • Chapter
The Teaching and Learning of Statistics

Abstract

Dealing with statistical information requires critically reviewing evidence. Critical thinking consists of components like inductive reasoning, and questioning assertions and hypotheses. Even though statistical thinking and critical thinking appear to have strong links from a theoretical point of view, empirical research about the intersections and potential interrelatedness of these aspects of competence is scarce. Responding to this research need, this chapter aims to identify how abilities in both areas may be interdependent. A preliminary and exploratory qualitative study has been undertaken into thinking processes when working on tasks from both areas. This chapter reports a case study from one of the interviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aizikovitsh-Udi, E. (2012). Developing critical thinking through probability models, intuitive judgments and decision-making under uncertainty (Doctoral dissertation). Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP Lambert. ISBN 978-3-8383-7240-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Amit, M. (2008). Developing critical thinking in probability lesson. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 9–13). Morelia, México: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond Formulas in Mathematics and Teaching: Dynamics of the High School Algebra Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. J., Goos, M., & Morony, W. (2007). Problem solving and working mathematically: An Australian perspective. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H., & Millman, J. (1985). Cornell critical thinking test—Level Z. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2004). Statistical literacy, meanings, components, responsibilities. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 47–78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kröpfl, B., Peschek, W., & Schneider, E. (2000). Stochastik in der Schule: Globale Ideen, lokale Bedeutungen, zentrale Tätigkeiten. [Stochastics in school: Global ideas, local significances, central activities]. Mathematica Didactica, 23(2), 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntze, S., Engel, J., Martignon, L. & Gundlach, M. (2010). Aspects of statistical literacy between competency measures and indicators for conceptual knowledge—empirical research in the project RIKO-STAT. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of ICOTS 8. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications.php.

  • Kuntze, S., Lindmeier, A. & Reiss, K. (2008). “Using models and representations in statistical contexts” as a sub-competency of statistical literacy—results from three empirical studies. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 11). Monterrey, Mexico: Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon. Retrieved from http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/474.

  • McPeck, J. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading, C. (2002). Profile for statistical understanding. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/1/1a4_read.pdf.

  • Royalty, J. (1995). The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Paranormal Beliefs Versus Statistical Reasoning. The Journal of Genetic Psychologist, 156(4), 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallman, K. (1993). Enhancing statistical literacy: Enriching our society. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–121). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., Kelly, B. A., Callingham, R. A., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2003). The measurement of school students’ understanding of statistical variation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 3, 223–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einav Aizikovitsh-Udi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., Kuntze, S., Clarke, D. (2016). Connections Between Statistical Thinking and Critical Thinking: A Case Study. In: Ben-Zvi, D., Makar, K. (eds) The Teaching and Learning of Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23470-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23470-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23469-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23470-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics