Skip to main content

Urinary Diversion and Drainage

  • Chapter
Interventional Urology

Abstract

Urinary diversion and drainage procedures include percutaneous nephrostomy in native and transplant kidneys, nephroureteral stent placement, ureteral stent placement, ureteral stricture management, ureteral embolization, suprapubic catheterization, and urinoma drainage. Collectively, these procedures represent minimally invasive, percutaneous strategies used to alter the flow of urine to relieve obstruction, to restore physiologic drainage, and to promote healing. This chapter describes the indications, techniques, and imaging guidance modalities related to urinary diversion and drainage procedures. Additionally, this chapter will discuss the management of the different types of catheters and stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157(11):891–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, et al. Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol. 1981;125(4):463–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Valji K. Practice of interventional radiology. In: Urologic and genital systems. p. 684–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dyer R, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy with extensions of the technique: step by step. Radiographic. 2002;22:503–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malloy PC. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7 Suppl):S240–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beddy P, Ryan JM. Antibiotic prophylaxis in interventional radiology—anything new? Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;9(2):69–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bui T. Airway management of patients undergoing non-OR procedures. Anesthesiology News. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caplin D. ACR-SIR practice guideline for sedation/analgesia. Reston: American College of Radiology (ACR); 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Millward S. Percutaneous nephrostomy: a practical approach. JVIR. 2000;11:955–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saad W. Percutaneous nephrostomy: native and transplanted kidneys. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;12(3):172–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbaric Z, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: placement under CT and fluoroscopy guidance. AJR. 1997;169:151–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sigel D. 3D imaging in the angiography suite advances interventional patient care. Appl Radiol. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cardella J. Society of interventional radiology. Standards of Practice Committee. Percutaneous Nephrostomy. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makramalla A, Zuckerman DA. “Nephroureteral stents: principles and techniques.”. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011;28(4). Thieme Medical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hausegger KA, Portugaller HR. Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique—indications—complications. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(9):2016–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tal R, et al. “Management of benign ureteral strictures following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.”. J Urol. 2007;178(2):538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drake MJ, Cowan NC. Fluoroscopy guided retrograde ureteral stent insertion in patients with a ureteroileal urinary conduit: method and results. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2049–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farooq A, Agarwal S, Jones V. Safe removal of an encrusted nephrostomy tube using a vascular sheath: a technique revisited. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(3):820–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weedin JW, Coburn M, Link RE. The impact of proximal stone burden on the management of encrusted and retained ureteral stents. J Urol. 2011;185(2):542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chung SY, Stein RJ, Landsittel D, Davies BJ, Cuellar DC, Hrebinko RL, et al. 15-year experience with the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with indwelling ureteral stents. J Urol. 2004;172(2):592–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hafez KS, Wolf Jr JS. Update on minimally invasive management of ureteral strictures. J Endourol. 2003;17(7):453–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwak S, Leef JA, Rosenblum JD. Percutaneous balloon catheter dilatation of benign ureteral strictures: effect of multiple dilatation procedures on long-term patency. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(1):97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mostafa SA, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of posttransplant ureteral obstructions. Urol J. 2008;5(2):79–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peregrin JH, et al. “Nephrostomy in early posttransplantation period in patients with nonfunctional graft and nondilated collecting system.”. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(2):458–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fayek SA, et al. Ureteral stents are associated with reduced risk of ureteral complications after kidney transplantation: a large single center experience. Transplantation. 2012;93(3):304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobayashi K, et al. Interventional radiologic management of renal transplant dysfunction: indications, limitations, and technical considerations 1. Radiographics. 2007;27(4):1109–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrison SC, et al. British Association of Urological Surgeons’ suprapubic catheter practice guidelines. BJU Int. 2011;107(1):77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drew M. Caplin MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caplin, D.M., Lombardi, P., Rambhia, S. (2016). Urinary Diversion and Drainage. In: Rastinehad, A., Siegel, D., Pinto, P., Wood, B. (eds) Interventional Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23463-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23464-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics