Skip to main content

Trends, Integration Tests and Nonsense Regressions

  • Chapter
Stochastic Processes and Calculus

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 149k Accesses

Abstract

Now we consider some applications of the propositions from the previous chapter. In particular, {e t } and {x t } are integrated of order 0 and integrated of order 1, respectively, cf. the definitions above Proposition 14.2. It turns out that the regression of a time series on a linear trend leads to asymptotically Gaussian estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Many more procedures have been developed over the last decades, notably the test by Elliott et al. (1996) with certain optimality properties.

  2. 2.

    Through numerous works by Peter Phillips the functional central limit theory has found its way into econometrics. This kind of limiting distributions was then celebrated as “non-standard asymptotics”; meanwhile it has of course become standard.

  3. 3.

    Equivalently, one might feed detrended data into the ADF regression above.

  4. 4.

    For the following calculation of s 2 we divide by n without correcting for degrees of freedom, which does not matter asymptotically (\(n \rightarrow \infty )\).

  5. 5.

    “Uncentered”, as the regression is calculated without intercept.

References

  • Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain “Goodness of Fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. W. K. (1991). Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica, 59, 817–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., & Park, J. (2002). On the asymptotics of ADF tests for unit roots. Econometric Reviews, 21, 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Trends versus random walks in time series analysis. Econometrica, 56, 1333–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64, 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1981). Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics, 16, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, U. (2000). Simple regressions with linear time trends. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 21, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D. F. (1980). Econometrics – alchemy or science? Economica, 47, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A Simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. Y., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes: Part I. Econometric Theory, 4, 468–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B. (1986). Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 33, 311–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B. (1987). Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica, 55, 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B, & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71, 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hassler, U. (2016). Trends, Integration Tests and Nonsense Regressions. In: Stochastic Processes and Calculus. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23428-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics