Skip to main content

Inferring Executable Models from Formalized Experimental Evidence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Methods in Systems Biology (CMSB 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 9308))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Executable symbolic models have been successfully used to analyze networks of biological reactions. However, the process of building an executable model from published experimental findings is still carried out manually. The process is very time consuming and requires expert knowledge. As a first step in addressing this problem, this paper introduces an automated method for deriving executable models from formalized experimental findings called datums. We identify the relevant data in a collection of datums. We then translate the information contained in datums to logical assertions. Together with a logical theory formalizing the interpretation of datums, these assertions are used to infer a knowledge base of reaction rules. These rules can then be assembled into executable models semi-automatically using the Pathway Logic system. We applied our technique to the experimental evidence relevant to Hras activation in response to Egf available in our datum knowledge base. When compared to the Pathway Logic model (curated manually from the same datums by an expert), our model makes most of the same predictions regarding reachability and knockouts. Missing information is due to missing assertions that require reasoning about the effects of mutations and background knowledge to generate. This is being addressed in ongoing work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Forward collection in this case is application of rules without removing the premises.

  2. 2.

    The assertion mapping code and logic are currently being extended and improved. We are happy to make the current working version available upon request.

References

  1. Albert, R., DasGupta, B., Dondi, R., Sontag, E.: Inferring (biological) signal transduction networks via transitive reductions of directed graphs. Algorithmica 51(2), 129–159 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Albert, R., DasGupta, B., Sontag, E.: Inference of signal transduction networks from double causal evidence. In: Fenyo, D. (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology: Topics in Computational Biology. Springer Science+Business Media LLC, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biocyc pathway/genome database collection (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blätke, M., Dittrich, A., Rohr, C., Heiner, M., Schaper, F., Marwan, W.: Jak/stat signalling: an executable model assembled from molecule-centred modules demonstrating a module-oriented database concept for systems and synthetic biology. Mol. Biosyst. 9(6), 1290–1307 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blinov, M.L., et al.: Pathway commons at virtual cell: use of pathway data for mathematical modeling. Bioinformatics 30(2), 292–294 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C. (eds.): All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. DARPA Big Mechanism Project (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, J., Henzinger, T.A.: Executable cell biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 25(11), 1239–1249 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Logic programs with classical negation. In: ICLP, pp. 579–597 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill, S.M., et al.: Bayesian inference of signaling network topology in a cancer cell line. Bioinformatics 28(21), 2804–2810 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Faber, W., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Perri, S., Scarcello, F.: The DLV system for knowledge redlvpresentation and reasoning. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 7, 499–562 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lincoln, P.D., Talcott, C.: Symbolic systems biology and pathway logic. In: Iyengar, S. (ed.) Symbolic Systems Biology, pp. 1–29. Jones and Bartlett, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theo. Comput. Sci. 96(1), 73–155 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Meseguer, J.: Twenty years of rewriting logic. J. Logic Algebraic Program. 81(7–8), 721–781 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Molinelli, E.J., et al.: Perturbation biology: inferring signaling networks in cellular systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9(12), e1003290 (2013). PMID: 24367245, PMCID: PMC3868523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pathway logic (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Protein interaction database (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reactome pathway database (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruths, D.: Deriving Executable Models of Biochemical Network Dynamics from Qualitative Data. Rice University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Talcott, C., Dill, D.L.: Multiple representations of biological processes. In: Priami, C., Plotkin, G. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Systems Biology VI. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4220, pp. 221–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Willemsen, T., Feenstra, K.A., Groth, P.T.: Building executable biological pathway models automatically from BioPAX. In: Linked Science 2013: Supporting Reproducibility, Scientific Investigations and Experiments, pp. 2–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Talcott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nigam, V., Donaldson, R., Knapp, M., McCarthy, T., Talcott, C. (2015). Inferring Executable Models from Formalized Experimental Evidence. In: Roux, O., Bourdon, J. (eds) Computational Methods in Systems Biology. CMSB 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23401-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23401-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23400-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23401-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics