Advertisement

The Assessment KSA Learning Journey: Expanding the 4L – Life-Long Learning Leader – Framework

  • Shelleyann ScottEmail author
  • Donald E. Scott
  • Charles F. Webber
Part of the The Enabling Power of Assessment book series (EPAS, volume 2)

Abstract

Drawing upon two previous research studies – the International Study of Principal Preparation (ISPP) and the Alberta Student Assessment Study (ASAS) – this chapter expands our ‘4L (life-long learning leader) framework’ and ‘assessment leader profile’ specifically related to assessment and evaluation. We examine the underlying philosophical orientations, values and beliefs, as well as the socio-political acumen leaders must acquire to be successful assessment change agents. We explore specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes/attributes that leaders must cultivate in order to create optimal assessment practices in their schools and systems. Additionally, we describe how leadership development is an ongoing process commencing at the initial preservice education stage continuing throughout an educator’s career, that is 4L – a life-long learning leaders’ journey pursuing excellence in assessment leadership and we provide a description of the implications for leaders and professional developers.

Keywords

Knowledge Skills and attributes/attitudes Leading assessment Life-long learning leader Visionary capacity Boundary breaking entrepreneurialism Professional skills Instructional design Assessment literacy Ethic of care Courage and commitment Political acumen Social acumen Instructional design Instrument design Innovation and change 

References

  1. Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., & Sraj, S. (2012). Factors affecting the transformational leadership role of principals in implementing ICT in schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 164–176.Google Scholar
  2. Aitken, N. (2012). Student voice in fair assessment practice. In C. F. Webber & J. L. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 175–200). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Arends, R. (2004). Learning to teach (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, B. D. (2012). Revisiting the age-old question: Does money matter in education? (pp. 1–37). Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Barry, K., & King, L. (1998). Beginning teaching and beyond (3rd ed.). Katoomba, NSW: Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berrett, B., Murphy, J., & Sullivan, J. (2012). Administrator insights and reflections: Technology integration in schools. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 200–221.Google Scholar
  8. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, G. (2002). Financing lifelong learning for all: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Economics of Education and Training.Google Scholar
  10. Cakir, R. (2012). Technology integration and technology leadership in schools as learning organizations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 273–282.Google Scholar
  11. Cam, E., & Isbulan, O. (2012). A new addiction for teacher candidates: Social networks. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 14–19.Google Scholar
  12. Cowie, M., & Crawford, M. (2008). “Being” a new principal in Scotland. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 676–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Cumming, J. J., & Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies and Practices, 6(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). San Francisco: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J. A., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2013). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. ERIC Document: ED437740.Google Scholar
  21. Hek, R. (2005). The experiences and needs of refugee and asylum seeking children in the UK: A literature review. Birmingham, UK: National Evaluation of the Children’s Fund, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  22. Holmlund, H., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2009). Does money matter for schools? London: Centre for the Economics of Education. London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  23. Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (2013). Instructional leadership. A research-based guide to learning in schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  24. Karstanje, P., & Webber, C. F. (2008). Programs for school principal preparation in East Europe. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keddie, A. (2011). Pursuing justice for refugee students: Addressing issues of cultural (mis)recognition. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(12), 1295–1310. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2011.560687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leithwood, K. (2012). School leadership, evidence-based, decision-making, and large-scale student assessment. In C. F. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 17–40). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2009). Turnaround schools: Leadership lessons. Education Canada, 49(2), 26–29.Google Scholar
  29. LeTendre, G. K., Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A. (2002). Teachers’ work: International isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Mensa Research Journal, 33(Winter), 46–71.Google Scholar
  30. Lupart, J., & Webber, C. F. (2002). Canadian schools in transition: Moving from dual education systems to inclusive schools. Exceptionality Education Canada, 12(2&3), 7–52.Google Scholar
  31. Mulford, B. (2008). The leadership challenge: Improving learning in schools. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  32. Mulford, B., Silins, H. C., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes (Vol. 3). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Nelson, S. W., de la Colina, M. G., & Boone, M. D. (2008). Lifeworld or systemsworld: What guides novice principals? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okoko, J.M., Scott, S., & Scott, D.E. (2012). Perceptions of school principals in Nairobi about their leadership preparation. Paper presented within the symposium “Enhancing leadership development in the international community” at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, April 13–17.Google Scholar
  35. Onguko, B., Abdalla, M., & Webber, C. F. (2008). Mapping principal preparation in Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ongwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal for Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 114–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Picus, L. O., & Odden, A. R. (2011). Reinventing school finance: Falling forward. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(3), 291–303. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2011.578986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polizzi, G. (2011). Measuring school principals’ support for ICT integration in Palermo, Italy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 3(2), 113–122.Google Scholar
  40. Riley, P. (2013). The Australian principal health and wellbeing survey (pp. 1–79). Clayton, VIC: Monash University.Google Scholar
  41. Rutter, J. (2006). Refugee children in the UK. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, D. E., & Scott, S. (2010). Innovations in the use of technology and teacher professional development. In J. O. Lindberg & A. D. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery (pp. 169–189). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott, S., & Webber, C. F. (2008). Evidence-based leadership development: The 4L framework. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 762–776. doi: 10.1108/09578230810908343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, S., & Webber, C. F. (2013). Entrepreneurialism for Canadian principals: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8(1), 113–136. doi: 10.1177/1942775112443438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegle, D. (2010). Cyberbullying and sexting: Technology abuses of the 21st Century. Gifted Child Today, 33(2), 14–16.Google Scholar
  46. Slater, C. L., Garcia, J. M., & Gorosave, G. L. (2008). Challenges of a successful first-year principal in Mexico. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 702–714. doi: 10.1108/09578230810908299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, M. L. (1997). Mixing and matching: Methods and models. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 73–85. doi: 10.1002/ev.1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2012). Psychology applied to teaching (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2005). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well. Kingston, ON: Canada Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  52. Todoric, M. E. (2011). Guidelines for acceptable electronic communication with students. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77(3), 47–49.Google Scholar
  53. Webber, C. F., Aitken, N., Lupart, J., & Scott, S. (2009). The Alberta Student Assessment Study: Final Report. Edmonton: The Government of Alberta. Available at: http://education.alberta.ca/media/1165612/albertaassessmentstudyfinalreport.pdf.Google Scholar
  54. Webber, C. F., Lupart, J., & Scott, S. (2012). The ecology of student assessment. In C. F. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 283–296). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webber, C. F., & Robertson, J. (1998). Boundary breaking: An emergent model for leadership development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6(21), 1–24.Google Scholar
  56. Webber, C. F., & Scott, S. (2012). Student assessment in a Canadian civil society. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 34–47. doi: 10.1108/02621711211190989.Google Scholar
  57. Webber, C. F., & Scott, S. (2013). Principles for principal preparation. In C. L. Slater & S. Nelson (Eds.), Understanding the principalship: An international guide to principal preparation (Vol. 19, pp. 73–100). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  58. Webber, C. F., Scott, S., Aitken, N., Lupart, J., & Scott, D. E. (2013). Leading assessment for enhanced student outcomes. School Leadership & Management, 33(3), 240–255. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2013.773885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wildy, H., & Clarke, S. (2008). Principals on L-plates: rear view mirror reflections. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 727–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelleyann Scott
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donald E. Scott
    • 1
  • Charles F. Webber
    • 2
  1. 1.Werklund School of EducationUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Continuing Education and ExtensionMount Royal UniversityCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations