Advertisement

Principal Leadership and Challenges for Developing a School Culture of Evaluation

  • Maria Luz Romay
  • Constance Magee
  • Charles L. SlaterEmail author
Part of the The Enabling Power of Assessment book series (EPAS, volume 2)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to identify how school principals can develop a culture of evaluation that will contribute to improving the quality of learning processes. If this goal is achieved, teachers, administrators and staff will respond more effectively to the needs of students and society in general. The chapter provides an overview of how the role of school principal has changed substantially during the last decade, demanding more rigorous assessment practices and accountability. The authors also discuss the nature and purposes of evaluation, emphasising the importance of integrating evaluation, planning, and decision-making. They describe common problems and attitudes that may impact the effectiveness of evaluations; in contrast, the chapter proposes several conditions that will allow the development of a culture of evaluation in schools. In order to demonstrate how these criteria work, a case study illustrates how they were applied by a school principal to resolve specific evaluation issues. The authors recommend that effective evaluations require cooperation between the school administration and teachers with open communication and active participation. This will not be possible without financial support and adequate training. It is the authors belief that if school principals put these recommendations into practice, it will be possible to develop a culture of evaluation within each educational community.

Keywords

Assessment and accountability Core curriculum standards Culture of evaluation Formal evaluations Ethical issues Formative evaluation Summative evaluations Integration of planning Decision-making Methodological capability Participative dialogue Principal’s role Programme evaluation Resistance to evaluation 

References

  1. Álvarez García, I. (1997). Theory of evaluation: Some practical examples (Teoría de evaluación: Algunos ejemplos prácticos). In Cuadernos de Filosofía y Letras (10). UNAM, 1985. Re-edited by UNESCO/CREFAL.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez García, I. (Ed.). (2008). Planning and development of educational and social Projects. (Planificación y desarrollo de proyectos sociales y educativos) (9th ed.). México: Limusa.Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez García, I., & Romay, M. L. (2013). Challenges for a culture of evaluation in educational institutions (Desafíos para una cultura de evaluación en las Instituciones Educativas). Mexico: Limusa-Noriega (Eds.).Google Scholar
  4. Berk, R. A. (1999). Thinking about program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bohte, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridges, E. M., & Groves, R. (2000). The micro and macro politics of personnel evaluation: A framework. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 321–337.Google Scholar
  7. Calonghi, L., Gianola, L. P., Groppo, M., Perucci, G., & Reguzzoni, M. (1991). The evaluation issue (El problema de la evaluación). Madrid: ITER Editors.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English Language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.orestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
  10. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
  11. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Decoo, W. (2002). Crisis on Campus: Confronting Academic Misconduct. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Erwin, D. T. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A Guide to the principles, goals and methods of determining college outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Flagg, B. N. (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (2008a). The six secrets to change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Fullan, M. (2008b). What’s worth fighting for in the principalship? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Glatthorn, A., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2012). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Guerra-Lopez, I. (2008). Performance evaluation: Approaches for improving program and organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Heilig, J. V., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, H. C. (2009). Evaluating value-added models: A measurement perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemmis, S. (1989). Seven principles for programs evaluation in curriculum development and innovation. (pp. 117-140). In E. R. House (Ed.), New directions in educational evaluation. Lewes, VA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Ladson Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. Schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leithwood, K., Lewis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center of Applied Research and Educational Improvement.Google Scholar
  26. Lincoln, I. S., & Guba, E. G. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Madaus, G., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. (1990). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  28. Martínez Slanova, E. (1980). Principles of evaluation (Los principios de la evaluación). Madrid: ICE/UPM. Retrieved from http://www.uhu.es/cine.educacion/didactica/0092principiosevaluacion.htm
  29. Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development & Aurora: Mid-continent Research for Education Learning.Google Scholar
  30. Mathison, S. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. McNeil, L. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. McNeil, L. (2000a). Contradictions of school reform: The educational cost of standardized testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. McNeil, L. (2000b). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(10), 729–734.Google Scholar
  34. McNeil, L. M., Coppola, E., Radigan, J., & Heilig, J. V. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(3), 1–45.Google Scholar
  35. Munro, J. H. (2008). Educational leadership. Boston: McGraw Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  36. National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) & Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
  37. Nelson, S., & McGhee, M. (2004). Time-off task: How test preparation is siphoning instructional time for students of colour and students of poverty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, S., McGhee, M., Meno, L., & Slater, C. L. (2007). Fulfilling the promise of educational accountability: A unique perspective. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(9), 702–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelson, S., McGhee, M., Reardon, R., Gonzales, K., & Kent, C. (2007). Supplanting teaching with testing: Does it raise test scores? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  40. Nevo, D. (1986). The conceptualization of educational evaluation. (pp. 15-30). In E. R. House (Ed.), New Directions in educational evaluation. Lewes, DE: Falmer.Google Scholar
  41. Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D. C. (2012). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(20). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1048
  42. Owen, J. M. (2006). Program evaluation: Formative approach (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford.Google Scholar
  43. PARCC. (2013). Partnership for assessment of readiness for College and careers. Retrieved from http://www.parcconline.org/
  44. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Peterson, K. D. (2009). Teacher evaluation: Comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quick, P. M., & Normore, A. H. (2004). Moral leadership in the 21st century: Everyone is watching: Especially the students. The Educational Forum, 68(4), 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Radcliffe, J. (2010, March 4). Cheating allegations tighten TAKS test security: State switches exam essay topic, sends monitors to two HISD schools. Houston Chronicle. Google Scholar
  49. Reeves, D. (2009). Leading change in your school. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  50. Romay, M. L., & Crispin, B. M. L. (2000). Self-evaluation and faculty development. In Faculty evaluation (Evaluacion de la Docencia) (Chapter 14, pp. 341–364). México: Paidós.Google Scholar
  51. Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, M. (1992). Evaluation: A systematic approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Rueda, R. (2011). The three dimensions of improving students’ performance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schemo, D. J., & Fessenden, F. (2003, December 03). A miracle revisited: Measuring success; gains in Houston Schools: How real are they? New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/us/a-miracle-revisited-measuring-success-gains-in-houston-schools-how-real-are-they.html.
  54. Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  55. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  56. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Shawn, I., & Greene, J. (2006). Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Slater, C. L., McGhee, M., Nelson, S., & Meno, L. (2011). Lessons learned: The promise and possibility of educational accountability in the United States. In C. F. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 41–58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (2013) retrieve from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/
  61. Spaulding, D. T. (2008). Program Evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  62. Stake, R. E. (1990). Responsive evaluation. In H. G. Walberg & G. D. Haertel (Eds.), The International encyclopaedia of educational evaluation (pp. 75–77). Oxford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stufflebeam, D. L., et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.Google Scholar
  64. U.S. Department of Education. (2009a). Title I — Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg1.htm
  65. U.S. Department of Education. (2009b). President Obama, U.S. Secretary of Education Duncan announces national competition to advance school reform. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/07/07242009.html
  66. Weiss, C. H. (1992). Evaluation research: Methods to determine efficiency of programs (Investigación Evaluativa: Métodos para determinar la eficiencia de los programas). México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  67. Whitaker, T. (2003). What great principals do differently? Larchmont, VA: Eye on Education.Google Scholar
  68. Wholey, J., & Newcomer, K. (1994). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Wildy, H., & Clarke, S. (2008). Charting an arid landscape: The preparation of novice primary principals in Western Australia. School Leadership and Management, 28(5), 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Winerip, M. (2011, July 18). Cracking a system in which test scores were for changing. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/18/education/18oneducation.html?_r=0
  71. Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Luz Romay
    • 1
  • Constance Magee
    • 2
  • Charles L. Slater
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Physical TherapyUniversity of the Incarnate WordSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Lindbergh Middle SchoolLong BeachUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationCalifornia State UniversityLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations