Abstract
If citizen science is to be used in the context of environmental research, there needs to be a rigorous evaluation of humans’ cognitive ability to interpret and classify environmental features. This research, with a focus on land cover, explores the extent to which citizen science can be used to sense and measure the environment and contribute to the creation and validation of environmental data. We examine methodological differences and humans’ ability to classify land cover given different information sources: a ground-based photo of a landscape versus a ground and aerial based photo of the same location. Participants are solicited from the online crowdsourcing platform Amazon Mechanical Turk. Results suggest that across methods and in both ground-based, and ground and aerial based experiments, there are similar patterns of agreement and disagreement among participants across land cover classes. Understanding these patterns is critical to form a solid basis for using humans as sensors in earth observation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sparks, K., Klippel, A., Wallgrün, J.O., Mark, D.: Crowdsourcing landscape perceptions to validate land cover classifications. In: Ahlqvist, O., Janowicz, K., Varanka, D., Fritz, S. (eds.) Land Use and Land Cover Semantics - Principals, Best Practices and Prospects. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2015)
Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M.: Geo-Wiki.Org: the use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 1(3), 345–354 (2009)
Ahlqvist, O.: In search of classification that supports the dynamics of science: the FAO land cover classification system and proposed modifications. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 35(1), 169–186 (2008)
Comber, A., Fisher, P., Wadsworth, R.: What is land cover? Environ. Plan. B 32, 199–209 (2005)
Jepsen, M.R., Levin, G.: Semantically based reclassification of Danish land-use and land-cover information. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 27(12), 2375–2390 (2013)
Robbins, P.: Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Hum. Ecol. 31(2), 233–253 (2003)
Ahlqvist, O.: Semantic issues in land use and land cover studies – foundations, application and future directions. In: Giri, C. (ed.) Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover: Principles and Applications, pp. 25–36. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2012)
Coeterier, J.F.: Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 34(1), 27–44 (1996)
Habron, D.: Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 42(1), 45–56 (1998)
Comber, A., Fisher, P., Wadsworth, R.: Integrating land-cover data with different ontologies: identifying change from inconsistency. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 18(7), 691–708 (2004)
Foody, G.M.: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 80, 185–201 (2002)
Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., Popović, Z., Jaskolski, M., Baker, D.: Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18(10), 1175–1177 (2011)
Clery, D.: Galaxy zoo volunteers share pain and glory of research. Science 333, 173–175 (2011)
LUCAS: Land use/cover area frame statistical survey. http://www.lucas-europa.info/
COBWEB: Citizen observatory web. https://cobwebproject.eu
Perger, C., Fritz, S., See, L., Schill, C., van der Velde, M., McCallum, I., Obersteiner, M.: A campaign to collect volunteered geographic information on land cover and human impact. In: GI_Forum 2012: Geovizualisation, Society and Learning (2012)
See, L., Comber, A., Salk, C., Fritz, S., van der Velde, M., Perger, C., Schill, C., McCallum, I., Kraxner, F., Obersteiner, M., Preis, T.: Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and non-experts. PLoS ONE 8(7), e69958 (2013)
Foody, G.M., See, L., Fritz, S., Van der Velde, M., Perger, C., Schill, C., Boyd, D.S.: Assessing the accuracy of volunteered geographic information arising from multiple contributors to an internet based collaborative project. Trans. GIS 17(6), 847–860 (2013)
Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., See, L., Fritz, S., McCallum, I.: Comparing expert and non-expert conceptualisations of the land: an analysis of crowdsourced land cover data. In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds.) COSIT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8116, pp. 243–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Comber, A., See, L., Fritz, S.: The impact of contributor confidence, expertise and distance on the crowdsourced land cover data quality. In: GI_Forum 2014 - Geospatial Innovation for Society (2014)
Iwao, K., Nishida, K., Kinoshita, T., Yamagata, Y.: Validating land cover maps with degree confluence project information. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L23404 (2006)
Foody, G.M., Boyd, D.S.: Using volunteered data in land cover map validation: mapping West African forests. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 6(3), 1305–1312 (2013)
OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org
Arsanjani, J.J., Helbich, M., Bakillah, M., Hagenauer, J., Zipf, A.: Toward mapping land-use patterns from volunteered geographic information. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 27(12), 2264–2278 (2013)
Klippel, A.: Spatial information theory meets spatial thinking - is topology the Rosetta Stone of spatio-temporal cognition? Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 102(6), 1310–1328 (2012)
Qualtrics: online survey software & insight platform. http://www.qualtrics.com/
Fry, J., Xian, G., Jin, S., Dewitz, J., Homer, C., Yang, L., Barnes, C., Herold, N., Wickham, J.: Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 77(9), 858–864 (2011)
Wickham, J.D., Stehman, S.V., Gass, L., Dewitz, J., Fry, J.A., Wade, T.G.: Accuracy assessment of NLCD 2006 land cover and impervious surface. Remote Sens. Environ. 130, 294–304 (2013)
Klippel, A., Mark, D., Wallgrün, J.O., Stea, D.: Conceptualizing landscapes: a comparative study of landscape categories with Navajo and English-speaking participants. In: Fabrikant, S.I., Raubal, M., Bertolotto, M., Davies, C., Freundschuh, S.M., Bell, S. (eds.) Proceedings, Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2015), Santa Fe, NM, USA. Springer, Berlin, 12–16 Oct 2015
Acknowledgments
This research is funded by the National Science Foundation (#0924534). We would like to thank the Degree Confluence Project for permission to use photos from the confluence.org website for our research. We would like to thank the members of the Human Factors in GIScience laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sparks, K., Klippel, A., Wallgrün, J.O., Mark, D. (2015). Citizen Science Land Cover Classification Based on Ground and Aerial Imagery. In: Fabrikant, S., Raubal, M., Bertolotto, M., Davies, C., Freundschuh, S., Bell, S. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9368. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23373-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23374-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)