Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Public Perception of Quality Improvement in Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Quality Improvement

Part of the book series: Success in Academic Surgery ((SIAS))

  • 682 Accesses

Abstract

Variation in the quality of health care patients receive is endemic, and medical errors (at both the provider and system levels) now rank as the third leading cause of death in the U.S. An analysis of surgeons performing colectomy procedures over a two-year period in Maryland showed that risk-adjusted complication rates varied between zero and ten times the average complication rate. Given these hazards, the public is eager to receive information to help them navigate the system to find reliable, state-of-the art surgical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen M, Pierce O. MAKING THE CUT. Why choosing the right surgeon matters even more than you know 2015 [cited 2016 February 21st]. Available from: https://www.propublica.org/article/surgery-risks-patient-safety-surgeon-matters.

  • Auffenberg GB, Ghani KR, Ye Z, Dhir A, Gao Y, Stork B, et al. Comparing publicly reported surgical outcomes with quality measures from a statewide improvement collaborative. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(7):680–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin JM, Jha AK, Romano PS, Singer SJ, Vogus TJ, Wachter RM, et al. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(3):423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon N. Will doctor rating sites improve standards of care? Yes. BMJ. 2009;338:b1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Marciniak TA, Krumholz HM. Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction? N Engl J Med. 1999;340(4):286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P. Patients rarely use online ratings to pick physicians 2008 [cited 2016 February 22nd]. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/06/23/bil10623.htm.

  • Freidberg MW, Pronovost PJ, Shahian DM, Safran DG, Bilimoria KY, Elliott MN, et al. A methodological critique of the ProPublica surgeon scorecard: RAND; 2014 [cited 2016 March 22nd]. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE170.html.

  • Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1), e38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Glover M, Khalilzadeh O, Choy G, Prabhakar AM, Pandharipande PV, Gazelle GS. Hospital evaluations by social media: a comparative analysis of facebook ratings among performance outliers. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(10):1440–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halasyamani LK, Davis MM. Conflicting measures of hospital quality: ratings from "Hospital Compare" versus "Best Hospitals". J Hosp Med. 2007;2(3):128–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YY, Peyre SE, Arriaga AF, Osteen RT, Corso KA, Weiser TG, et al. Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):115–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe TA, Hasday SJ, Dimick JB. Power outage-inadequate surgeon performance measures leave patients in the dark. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(7):599–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo S, Xu T, Makary MA. Video transparency: a powerful tool for patient safety and quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016: 2016 Jan 28. pii: bmjqs-2015-005058. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005058. [Epub ahead of print].

  • Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):942–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu H, Wick EC, Housman M, Freischlag JA, Makary MA. Patient satisfaction as a possible indicator of quality surgical care. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(4):362–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makary MA. Unaccountable. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makary MA. The power of video recording: taking quality to the next level. JAMA. 2013;309(15):1591–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makary MA. Why our health care system is broken 2015 [cited 2016 March 22nd]. Available from: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/22/opinions/makary-health-care-system/.

  • Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error: the third leading cause of death in the U.S. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medicare. Medicare.gov Physician Compare 2016 [cited 2016 February 20th]. Available from: https://www.medicare.gov/PhysicianCompare/search.html.

  • Mulvey GK, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wang OJ, Chen J, Keenan PS, et al. Mortality and readmission for patients with heart failure among U.S. News & World Report's top heart hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):558–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ghaferi AA, Upchurch Jr GR, Dimick JB. Do popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings identify hospitals with better cardiovascular surgery outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Nicholas LH, Dimick JB, Mph M. Evaluating popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):600–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overdyk FJ, Dowling O, Newman S, Glatt D, Chester M, Armellino D, et al. Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope DG. Reacting to rankings: evidence from "America's Best Hospitals". J Health Econ. 2009;28(6):1154–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ProPublica. What Experts Are Saying About Surgeon Scorecard 2015 [cited 2016 February 21st]. Available from: https://www.propublica.org/article/surgeon-level-risk-quotes.

  • Rajaram R, Chung JW, Kinnier CV, Barnard C, Mohanty S, Pavey ES, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with penalties in the centers for Medicare & Medicaid services hospital-acquired condition reduction program. JAMA. 2015;314(4):375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg MB, Morsi E, Benjamin EM, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK. Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1680–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, Thurston I, Brooks K, Puccia R. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2), e50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman KL, Gordon EJ, Mahvi DM, Chung J, Bentrem DJ, Holl JL, et al. Surgeons' perceptions of public reporting of hospital and individual surgeon quality. Med Care. 2013;51(12):1069–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinaiko AD, Eastman D, Rosenthal MB. How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(3):602–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S. Doc's RateMDs battle turns ugly. National Review of Medicine. 2007 [cited 2016 February 22nd]. Available from: http://www.nationalreviewofmedicine.com/issue/2007/05_15/4_patients_practice09_9.html.

  • Wei S, Pierce O, Allen M. Surgeon Scorecard 2015 [cited 2016 February 20th]. Available from: https://projects.propublica.org/surgeons/.

  • Xu T, Makary MA, Kazzi EA, Zhou M, Pawlik TM, Hutfless SM. Surgeon-level variation in postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(7):1393–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Resident, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    James Taylor MBBChir, MPH

  2. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Tim Xu MPP

  3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Martin A. Makary MD, MPH

Authors
  1. James Taylor MBBChir, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim Xu MPP
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin A. Makary MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Makary MD, MPH .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Rachel R. Kelz

  2. The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA

    Sandra L. Wong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J., Xu, T., Makary, M.A. (2017). The Public Perception of Quality Improvement in Surgery. In: Kelz, R., Wong, S. (eds) Surgical Quality Improvement. Success in Academic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23356-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23356-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23355-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23356-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation