Skip to main content

Fairer Assessment for Indigenous Students: An Australian Perspective

  • Chapter
Book cover Leadership of Assessment, Inclusion, and Learning

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 3))

Abstract

Drawing on the largest collection and analysis of empirical data on multiple facets of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education in state schools to date, this chapter critically analyses the systemic push for standardised testing and improved scores in Australia, and argues for a greater balance of assessment types. Alternative, inclusive, participatory approaches to student assessment are recommended. Research evidence from a major evaluation of the Stronger Smarter Learning Communities (SSLC) project conducted by a Core Evaluation Team based at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Education underpins this argument for fairer assessment and ethical leadership. This evaluation presents the first large-scale picture of what is occurring in classroom assessment and pedagogy for Indigenous students; however the focus in this chapter remains on leadership and student assessment. Additional evidence is drawn from an Australian Research Council Linkage project that sought to explore ways to improve learning outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students through fairer assessment practices. At a time of unrelenting high-stakes, standardised testing in Australia with a dominance of secondary as opposed to primary uses of student achievement data by systems, schools and leaders, formative as well as summative purposes of assessment are called for with more alternative student assessment incorporated in teachers’ pedagogic practices to cater for increased student diversity and to recognise the cultural needs of Indigenous students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout this chapter I will use a capital for the word Indigenous as a mark of respect and as is protocol.

  2. 2.

    Indigenous Teacher Assistant (ITA) is used throughout this chapter; however, other terms frequently used are Indigenous Education Worker (IEW) and Indigenous Education Aide (IEA).

  3. 3.

    ‘Personal Learning Plans’ should not be confused with terms such as ‘Individualised Education Programme’ as used in the United States, or the Canadian term ‘Individual Education Plan’ which refer to support programmes or plans for ‘exceptional pupils’ or students with special needs.

References

  • Ainscow, M. (2010). Achieving excellence and equity: Reflections on the development of practices in one local district over 10 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus, L. (2006). Educational leadership and the imperative of including student voices, student interest, and students’ lives in the mainstream. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., O’Sullivan, D., & Berryman, M. (2010). Scaling up education reform: Addressing the politics of disparity. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, S. B. (1999). Inclusion needs a different school culture. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (2012). A framework for social justice in education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 178–198. doi:10.4471/ijep.2012.11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2009). Sustaining the next generation of teacher-researchers to work for social justice. In B. Somekh & S. Noffke (Eds.), Handbook of educational action research (pp. 177–185). London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2008). National report to parliament on Indigenous education and training, 2006. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEEWR. (2012). Indigenous overview. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/indigenous/Pages/Overview.aspx

  • Duignan, P. (2012). Educational leadership: Together creating ethical learning environments (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A., Howes, A., & Roberts, B. (2002). A systematic review of the effectiveness of school-level actions for promoting participation by all students (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1). Research Evidence in Education Library. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, L., Klenowski, V., Harris, J., Smeed, J., Carrington, S., & Ainscow, M. (2013, September 3–5). Ethical leadership in a time of increasing accountability. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association annual conference. Brighton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New left review, 3(May–June), 107–119. Retrieved from http://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). What’s worth fighting for in your school? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2009). Fairness in assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 105–118). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Commission. (2013). A public policy statement, The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from www.gordoncommission.org

  • Hipwell, P., & Klenowski, V. (2011). A case for addressing the literacy demands of student assessment. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(2), 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Cazden, C., Coopes, R., Klenowski, V., Ladwig, J., Lester, J., … Woods, A. (2013, March). A summative evaluation of the stronger smarter learning communities project, Report (Vol. 1). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahuika, R., Berryman, M., & Bishop, R. (2011). Issues of culture and assessment in New Zealand education pertaining to Māori students. Assessment Matters, 3, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Hall, K., McCormick, R., & Drury, R. (2008). Curriculum, learning and society: Investigating practice (Study guide, masters in education). Maidenhall, UK: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: The BBC Reith Lectures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment, pointers for policy development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/synergies-for-better-learning.htm

  • Strathern, M. (1997). Improving ratings: Audit in the British university system. European Review, 5, 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the joint funding arrangement between the Australian Research Council, Queensland University of Technology, the Independent Schools of Queensland and the Catholic Education Diocese of Townsville.

Acknowledgement is also made for the funding received from the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations for the evaluation and research completed by the members of the Core Research Team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Val Klenowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

This chapter reflects the views of the author and in no way represents the views of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, the Queensland University of Technology or the Stronger Smarter Institute and Stronger Smarter Learning Communities Project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klenowski, V. (2016). Fairer Assessment for Indigenous Students: An Australian Perspective. In: Scott, S., Scott, D., Webber, C. (eds) Leadership of Assessment, Inclusion, and Learning. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23347-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23347-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23346-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23347-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics