Skip to main content

Mobile-Health Tool Use and Community Health Worker Performance in the Kenyan Context: A Comparison of Task-Technology Fit Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • 1297 Accesses

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 20))

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to contribute to closing an apparent gap in evidence of factors that contribute to the use of mHealth tools and performance of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the Kenyan context. This is achieved by (i) identifying a relevant set of dimensions along which to evaluate healthcare service task and technology characteristics (ii) identifying a relevant set of dimensions along which to evaluate mHealth tool use (iii) and using these dimensions to conceptualize Task-Technology Fit (TTF) perspectives i.e., covariation, mediation, matching and moderation as four distinct models through which mHealth tool use and CHW performance can be explained. This research is based on the premise that the effect of the fit between the healthcare service task and the mHealth tool can influence use and user performance in four different ways i.e., as the coalignment between them (covariation), a perceived intervening variable (mediation), their match as corresponding pairs (matching), or the interactions between these task and tool components (moderation). Findings of the study will provide robust evidence of the contribution of mHealth tool use to CHW performance, particularly in a developing world context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Earth Institute (2010) One million community health workers. Technical taskforce report. http://www.milleniumvillages.org/uploads/ReportPaper/1mCHW_TechnicalTaskForceReport.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2014

  2. Liu A, Sullivan S, Khan M, Sachs G, Singh P (2011) Community health workers in global health: scale and scalability. Mount Sinai J Med 78(1):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mechael PN (2009) The case for mHealth in developing countries. Innovations 4(1):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LeMaire (2011) Scaling up mobile health: elements for the successful scale up of mHealth in developing countries. http://www.k4health.org/sites/sites/default/files/ADA_mHealth%20White%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2014

  5. Dishaw MT, Strong DM (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inform Manage 36:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodhue DL (1997) The model underlying the measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end users. J Am Soc Inform Sci 48(5):449–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Junglas I, Abraham C, Ives B (2009) Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance. Decis Support Syst 46:534–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Teo SH, Men B (2008) Knowledge portals in Chinese consulting firms: a Task-Technology Fit perspective. Eur J Inform Syst 17(1):557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang ETG, Shih S, Jiang J, Klein G (2008) The consistency among facilitating factors and ERP implementation success: a holistic view of fit. J Syst Software 81(9):1609–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsiao J, Chen R (2012) An investigation on Task-Technology Fit of mobile nursing information systems for nursing performance. Comput Inform Nurs 30(5):265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergeron F, Raymond L, Rivard S (2001) Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega 29(2):125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manage Rev 14(3):423–444

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin T, Huang C (2008) Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: an integration of social cognitive theory and Task-Technology Fit. Inform Manage 45:410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan Y, Archer N, Connelly CE, Zheng W (2010) Identifying the ideal fit between mobile work and mobile work support. Inform Manage 47:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Ambra J, Wilson CS, Akter S (2013) Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of e-Books by academics. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 64(1):48–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-Technology Fit and individual performance. MIS Quart 19(2):213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Otieno AW (2012) Improving health communications in Kenya: a feasibility study on engaging frontline healthcare workers in using mobile technologies. http://innovation.internews.org/sites/default/files/research/2.28%20InternewsWP12Kenya.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2014

  18. Liang T, Wei C (2004) Introduction to the special issue: mobile commerce applications. Int J Electron Commer 8(3):7–17

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS (2000) The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J Strategic Inform Syst 9(2):129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform Syst Res 16(1):85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodhue DL, Klein BD, March ST (2000) User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Inform Manage 38(2):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K, Saunders CS (2005) Information processing view of organizations: An exploratory examination of fit in the context of inter-organizational relationships. J Manage Inform Syst 22(1):257–29

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hair JF, Babin B, Money AH, Samouel P (2003) Essentials of business research methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2012) Research methods for business students. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vanderstoep SW, Johnston DD (2009) Research methods for everyday life, blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leedy P, Ormrod J (2013) Practical research: planning and design. Pearson, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hou C (2012) Examining the effects of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: an empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry. Int J Inform Manage 32(1):560–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Torkzadeh G, Doll W (1999) The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. Int J Manage Sci 27(1):327–339

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gebauer J, Tang Y (2008) Applying the theory of Task-Technology Fit to mobile technology: the role of user mobility. Int J Mobile Commun 6(3):321–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balasubramanian S, Peterson RA, Jarvenpaa SL (2002) Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing. J Acad Market Sci 30(4):114–121

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ballard DI, Siebold DR (2004) Organizational members’ communication and temporal experience: Scale development and validation. Commun Res 31(2):135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gebauer J, Shaw MJ, Gribbins ML (2005) Towards a specific theory of Task-Technology Fit for mobile information systems. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business Working Paper 05-0119

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gebauer J, Shaw MJ, Gribbins ML (2010) Task-Technology Fit for mobile information systems. J Inform Technol 25:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Global Health Workforce Alliance (2010) Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related Millennium Development Goals. http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/chwreport/en/. Accessed 30 Aug 2014

  36. Gupta S (2003) Knowledge management and performance: a fit perspective. In: Ninth Americas conference on information systems, Tampa, August 2003

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dishaw MT, Strong, DM (1998) Supporting software maintenance with software engineering tools: a computed task-technology fit analysis. J Syst Software 44:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  39. Daniel J (2012) Sampling essentials. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maradona C. Gatara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatara, M.C. (2016). Mobile-Health Tool Use and Community Health Worker Performance in the Kenyan Context: A Comparison of Task-Technology Fit Perspectives. In: Lazakidou, A., Zimeras, S., Iliopoulou, D., Koutsouris, DD. (eds) mHealth Ecosystems and Social Networks in Healthcare. Annals of Information Systems, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23341-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics