Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter starts by providing evidence of the growing importance of services in our society which was reinforced by recent technological and economic developments. Thereafter, a service definition is presented and discussed in detail to explain the basic principles of services. Concepts from operations management are used to describe services as transformation processes involving resources from both customer and provider. The last section contrasts services with goods and investigates the differences in marketing and management of these distinct economic commodities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Services cover government activities, communications, transportation, finance, and all other private economic activities that do not produce material goods.

  2. 2.

    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  3. 3.

    Photos used under the public domain dedication license (http://all-free-download.com/).

References

  1. Manyika J et al (2010) How to compete and grow: a sector guide to policy. Technical report, McKinsey Global Institute

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vargo S, Maglio P, Akaka M (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J 26(3):145–152. ISSN:0263-2373

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gagliordi N (2015) Enterprise software spend to reach $620 billion in 2015: Forrester. http://www.zdnet.com/article/enterprise-software-spend-to-reach-620-billion-in-2015-forrester/. Accessed 7 Jan 2015

  4. EU directive 2006/123/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market. Technical report, European Union (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Economic Assessment of the Barriers for the Internal Market for Services. Technical report, Copenhagen Economic (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Innovation for Better Public Services. Technical report. 48th session of the Public Governance Committee, OECD Conference Centre Paris, France: OECD (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Durkheim E (1947) The division of labor in society (trans: Simpson G). The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill P (1977) On goods and services. Rev Income Wealth 23(4):315–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gadrey J (2002) The misuse of productivity concepts in services: lessons from a comparison between France and the United States. In: Productivity, innovation, and knowledge in services: new economic and socio-economic approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 26–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Riordan J (1962) Stochastic service systems. SIAM series in applied mathematics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skyttner L, Rose D (1996) General systems theory: an introduction. Information systems series. Macmillan Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Backlund A (2000) The definition of system. Kybernetes 29(4):444–451

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Vargo S, Lusch R (2004) The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. J Serv Res 6(4):324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kieliszewski C, Maglio P, Cefkin M (2012) On modeling value constellations to understand complex service system interactions. Eur Manag J. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.05.003

  15. Cardoso J (2013) Modeling service relationships for service networks. In: 4th International conference on exploring service science (IESS 1.3). Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 114–128

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott N, Laws E (2010) Advances in service networks research. Serv Ind J 30(10):1581–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wieland H et al (2012) Toward a service (Eco)systems perspective on value creation. Int J Serv Sci Manag Eng Technol 3(3):12–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Allee V (2000) Reconfiguring the value network. J Bus Strateg 21(4):36–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rouse W, Basole R (2010) Understanding complex product and service delivery systems. In: Handbook of service science. Springer, New York, pp 461–480

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Blau B et al (2009) Service value networks. In: IEEE conference on commerce and enterprise computing, CEC ‘09, pp 194–201

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baltacioglu T et al (2007) A new framework for service supply chains. Serv Ind J 27(2):105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gnedenko B, König D (1983) Handbuch der Bedienungstheorie I und II. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hall R (1991) Queueing methods: for services and manufacturing. Prentice-Hall international series in industrial and systems engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R (2010) Operations management. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  25. Greasley A (2009) Operations management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sampson S (2010) The unified service theory. English. In: Maglio P, Kieliszewski C, Spohrer J (eds) Handbook of service science. Service science: research and innovations in the service economy. Springer, New York, pp 107–131

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmenner R (1986) How can service business survive and prosper? Sloan Manage Rev 27(3):21–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10300742

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cedefop (2010) Briefing note—jobs in Europe to become more knowledge—and skills-intensive. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/9021_en.pdf. Visited on 30 Sept 2010

  29. Lahiri A, Seidmann A (2010) The hang-over effect in information-intensive service systems. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lovelock C, Yip G (1996) Developing global strategies for service business. Calif Manag Rev 38(2):64–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Edvardsson B, Gustafsson A, Roos I (2005) Service portraits in service research: a critical review. Int J Serv Ind Manag 16(1):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hill D, Gandhi N (1992) Service advertising: a framework to its effectiveness. J Serv Mark 6(4):63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mittal B (1999) The advertising of services: meeting the challenge of intangibility. J Serv Res 2(1):98–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Donabedian A (2005) Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q 83(4):691–729. ISSN:1468-0009

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shostack L (1982) How to design a service. Eur J Mark 16(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krafzig D, Banke K, Slama D (2005) Enterprise SOA: service-oriented architecture best practices. The Coad series. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  37. Erl T (2005) Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall PTR. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. ISBN:0131858580

    Google Scholar 

  38. Papazoglou M (2008) Web services: principles and technology. Pearson Education/Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilde E, Pautasso C (eds) (2011) REST: from research to practice. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  40. Judd R (1964) The case for redefining services. J Mark 28(1):58–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rathmell J (1966) What is meant by services? J Mark 30(4):32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lovelock C, Gummesson E (2004) Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. J Ser Res 7(1):20–41. http://jsr.sagepub.com/content/7/1/20.abstract

  43. Fitzsimmons J, Fitzsimmons M (2013) Service management: operations, strategy, and information technology. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lovelock C, Wirtz J (2011) Services marketing: people, technology, strategy. Pearson Publishing, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wittkowski K, Moeller S, Wirtz J (2013) Firms intentions to use nonownership services. J Serv Res 16(2):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bruce M (2011) Netflix my life: a culture of non-ownership. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/angst/201105/netflix-my-life-culture-non-ownership. Visited on 19 Apr 2014

  47. Trendwatching (2006) Transumers: consumers driven by experiences. http://trendwatching.com/trends/transumers.htm. Visited on 19 Apr 2014

  48. Botsman R (2010) Sharing is replacing owning. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/11/02/botsman.collaborative.consumption/. Visited on 19 Apr 2014

  49. Shankar V, Berry L, Dotzel T (2007) Creating and managing hybrid innovations. Presented at the American marketing association winter educators’ conference

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ulaga W, Reinartz W (2011) Hybrid offerings: how manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. J Mark 75(6):5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Steunebrink G (2012) The servitization of product-oriented companies. http://essay.utwente.nl/62039/

  52. Vandermerwe S, Rada J (1988) Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. Eur Manag J 6(4):314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Baines T et al (2007) State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221(10):1543–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Johansson J, Krishnamurthy C, Schlissberg H (2003) Solving the solutions problem. McKinsey Q 3:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kaner M, Karni R (2007) Design of service systems using a knowledge-based approach. Knowl Process Manag 14(4):260–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Cardoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1.1 Review Section

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Beside the recent developments identified in this chapter, which enabled the dissemination of services in modern society, enumerate other developments which were relevant.

  2. 2.

    Describe the types of digital services the UK government is providing to its citizens.

  3. 3.

    Execute a web search to identify which service industries have a higher market share. Contrast the values found for US, EU, and Asia.

  4. 4.

    Explain how the division of work and labor, and the ownership of resources, are prerequisites for the edification of a service-based society.

  5. 5.

    Compile a list of five distinct definitions for the term service and highlight possible limitations when compared to the definition from Hill [8] adopted in Sect. 1.2.1.

  6. 6.

    Provide four examples of services for each of the interaction types shown in Fig. 1.6.

  7. 7.

    Can the model of interaction types shown in Fig. 1.6 be extended with additional scenarios? Give examples of services for the new scenarios you have identified.

  8. 8.

    Due to the inseparability of production and consumption, services cannot be “stored”. What techniques, methods, or tools can be used to manage the supply and demand of services more effectively?

  9. 9.

    How can crowdsourcing be used to match service supply and demand more efficiently? Describe two or three services, which could benefit from this sourcing model.

  10. 10.

    Identify and discuss how five well-known companies from various service industries could provide new services using servitization as a differentiating model?

Project

Service systems can consist of hundreds or even thousands of components which are the combination of technology, processes, people skills, and material resources. To ease the comprehension of what constitutes a service, their decomposition and the identification of their main parts is important. Decomposition refers to the process by which a complex system is broken down into parts that are easier to understand, systematize, use, and maintain.

Table 1.3 The capstone model [55] proposed by Kaner and Karni to conceptualize service systems

The capstone model (also known as CAIOPHYKE) was proposed by Kaner and Karni to conceptualize service systems using a five-level hierarchy of components: major classes, main classes, attribute description, requirement/specification, and possible values. The model enables one to define a service system at several levels. Each level provides another layer of details. The major classes, which are nine, are the most relevant to understand the main components of a service system and are:

  1. 1.

    Customers. The people that benefit or are affected by the service. Customers can be seen as initiators and receivers of a service.

  2. 2.

    Aims. The goals, purposes, and meaning of the system.

  3. 3.

    Inputs. The inputs to the system. They include physical, human, and informational entities to be handled through the service system.

  4. 4.

    Outputs. The outputs from and effects of the system. They can also include physical, human, and informational entities after being handled in the system.

  5. 5.

    Processes. Processes that are performed by the system. They are the transformations for obtaining outputs from inputs.

  6. 6.

    Human enablers. Human enablers are the human resources that own and/or operate the system.

  7. 7.

    Physical enablers. Physical enablers are physical and technological resources which aid or support the operation of the system.

  8. 8.

    Information enablers. Information enablers are information and knowledge resources that support the system.

  9. 9.

    Environment. The system’s environment which include all the factors that can influence the system. For example, physical, technological, social, and legal factors.

The term CAIOPHYKE was derived from the letters of the nine major classes of the taxonomy constructed: Customers, Aims, Inputs, Outputs, Processes, Human enablers, Physical enablers, Information enablers (Knowledge), and Environment.

These nine major classes are extended to a second level of 75 main classes. At a third level, they are decomposed into 351 minor classes. The fourth and fifth levels include the actual attributes of a service and their possible values. A complete description of the various levels can be found in [55, p. 264].

Example (CAIOPHYKE)

The major class Customer has the main class Customer Feature, which in turn has the minor class Age, the attribute Age of Customers, and the possible values are: Children, Teenagers, Adults.

The major, main, and minor classes identify aspects of service systems, which can be analyzed to understand how a service is build and structured to, e.g., increase its transparency as well as discover and highlight the aspects that can be improved.

Key Terms

Service-Dominant Logic :

A theory which views service as the focus of economic and social exchange.

Service :

A service is a change in the condition of a person, or a good belonging to some economic unit, which is brought about as the result of the activity of some other economic unit, with the prior agreement of the former person or economic unit.

I-T-O Model :

A basic concept from operations management that represents a service as a transformation (T) process that takes inputs (I), transforms and adds value to them, and provides outputs (O) for customers.

Self-service :

A service which is provided without or with little human involvement on the provider’s side. The provider often sets up facilities or equipment that the customer can use to perform a certain task.

Knowledge-Intensive Services :

Services that heavily rely on professional knowledge.

IHIP :

An acronym for four concepts often used to characterize services: intangibility (I), heterogeneity (H), inseparability (I), and perishability (P).

Demand Aggregation :

An approach from the field of demand management which aggregates loads with different demand patterns to take advantage of the statistical effects that reduce variability in the aggregate demand.

Demand Conditioning :

An approach from the field of demand management which creates artificial incentives for customers to use services in off-peak periods.

Outsourcing :

A strategy that many companies follow to turn fixed costs into variable costs by paying for services only on demand to avoids risks if the company’s business goes up or down.

Servitization :

A strategy that a company may follow which consists in adding services to existing core products. The result is an hybrid offering in which products and services are integrated as one bundle.

Further Reading

James Fitzsimmons and Mona Fitzsimmons. Service Management: Operations, Strategy, Information Technology. McGraw-Hill, 2013.

Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz. Services Marketing. Prentice Hall, 2011.

Mairi Macintyre, Glenn Parry, and Jannis Angelis. Service Design and Delivery. Springer, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fromm, H., Cardoso, J. (2015). Foundations. In: Cardoso, J., Fromm, H., Nickel, S., Satzger, G., Studer, R., Weinhardt, C. (eds) Fundamentals of Service Systems. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23195-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23195-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23194-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23195-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics