Means of 2D and 3D Shapes and Their Application in Anatomical Atlas Building

  • Juan DomingoEmail author
  • Esther Dura
  • Guillermo Ayala
  • Silvia Ruiz-España
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9256)


This works deals with the concept of mean when applied to 2D or 3D shapes and with its applicability to the construction of digital atlases to be used in digital anatomy. Unlike numerical data, there are several possible definitions of the mean of a shape distribution and procedures for its estimation from a sample of shapes. Most popular definitions are based in the distance function or in the coverage function, each with its strengths and limitations. Closely related to the concept of mean shape is the concept of atlas, here understood as a probability or membership map that tells how likely is that a point belongs to a shape drawn from the shape distribution at hand. We devise a procedure to build probabilistic atlases from a sample of similar segmented shapes using information simultaneously from both functions: the distance and the coverage. Applications of the method in digital anatomy are provided as well as experiments to show the advantages of the proposed method regarding state of the art techniques based on the coverage function.


Probabilistic atlas Mean shapes Medical image segmentation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bauer, S., Seiler, C., Bardyn, T., Buechler, P., Reyes, M.: Atlas-based segmentation of brain tumor images using a markov random field-based tumor growth model and non-rigid registration. In: Annual Intl. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 4080–4083, September 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dura, E., Domingo, J.: Alternative method for binary shape alignment of non-symmetrical shapes based on minimal enclosing box. Electronics Letters 48(22), 1401–1402 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eddelbuettel, D., Francoisloader, R.: Rinside R package: C++ classes to embed R in C++ applications (2014).
  4. 4.
    Ibañez, M.V., Schroeder, W., Cates, L.: Insight Software Consortium The ITK Software Guide.
  5. 5.
    Jankowski, H., Stanberry, L.: Expectations of random sets and their boundaries using oriented distance functions. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 36, 291–303 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johan, H., Li, B., Wei, Y., Iskandarsyah, Y.W.: 3D model alignment based on minimum projection area. The Visual Computer 27(6–8), 565–574 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loader, C.: locfit R package: Local regression, likelihood and density estimation (2013).
  8. 8.
    Park, H., Bland, P.H., Meyer, C.R.: Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(4), 483–492 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pohl, K., Fisher, J., Bouix, S., Shenton, M., et al.: Using the logarithm of odds to define a vector space on probabilistic atlases. Medical Image Analysis 11(5), 465–477 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tateyama, T., Okegawa, M., Uetani, M., Tanaka, H., Kohara, S., Han, X., et al.: Efficient shape representation and statistical shape modeling of the liver using spherical harmonic functions (SPHARM). In: 13th Intl. Symp. on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS) Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS), pp. 428–431, November 2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiong, W., Ong, S.H., Tian, Q., Guozhen, X., Zhou, J., Liu, J., Venkatash, S.K.: Construction of a linear unbiased diffeomorphic probabilistic liver atlas from CT images. In: 16th IEEE Intl. Conference on Image Processing Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 1773–1776, November 2009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lötjönen, L., Wolz, R., Koikkalainen, J., Thurfiell, L., et al.: Improved generation of probabilistic atlases for the expectation maximization classification. In: IEEE Intl. Symp. on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 1839–1842 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, H., Hero, A., Bland, P., Kessler, M., Seo, J., Meyer, C.: Construction of Abdominal Probabilistic Atlases and Their Value in Segmentation of Normal Organs in Abdominal CT Scans. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E93.D(8), 2291–2301 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolz, R., Chu, C., Misawa, K., Fujiwara, M., Mori, K., Ruecket, D.: Automated Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation with Subject-specific Atlas Generation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 32(9), 1723–1730 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Domingo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Esther Dura
    • 1
  • Guillermo Ayala
    • 2
  • Silvia Ruiz-España
    • 3
  1. 1.Dpto. de Informática, Escuela de IngenieríasUniversity of ValenciaBurjasotSpain
  2. 2.Dpto. de Estadística e I.O., Facultad de MatemáticasUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Center of Biomaterials and Tissue EngineeringPolytechnic University of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations