Skip to main content

Theoretical Background

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing Pilot Projects as Boundary Objects

Abstract

This Chapter discusses arguments on collaboration and innovation through design, the importance of inter-organizational collaboration and collaborative networks as a means to build skills and improve MSE conditions, which are central to this research. The role of Design Pilot Projects for innovation as well as the issues of Design Management and strategies to achieve better managerial and organizational levels are also addressed. Moreover, two important subjects are discussed: (a) the role of Boundary Objects as elements that enable a common language in order to build a new knowledge among participants in collaborative processes; and (b) the ‘system-ability’ issues that help in local changes as well as in processes to scale up the transition towards more sustainable scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These include environmental protection, social development, survival of future generations, diversity, community engagement in policy issues, balance between production and consumption patterns to reduce unsustainable impacts, and cooperation, to improve scientific and technological skills and increase the diffusion of innovative technologies (United Nations, 1993).

References

  • T. Allen, Communications, technology transfer, and the role of technical gatekeeper. R&D Manag. 1, 14–21 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Atherton, P. Hannon, in Innovation Process in the Small Business: An Analysis of its Structure, Dynamics and Constituent Parts. (1999). http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1999/TOC.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2010

  • M. Bergman, A. Coxon, The quality in qualitative methods. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 6(2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Best, Design Management: Managing design strategy, Process and Implementation. (AVA Publishing, Switzerland, SA, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Brna, Models of Collaboration. (1998). http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/pbrna/papers/bcs98paper/bcs98.html. Accessed 17 Dec 2012

  • T. Brown, Design thinking. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Brown, in Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovations, 1st edn. (HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bruce, R. Cooper, D. Vazquez, Effective design management for small businesses. Des. Stud. 20, 297–315 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Burt, Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 92(6), 1287–1335 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Campos, S. Cario, J. Nicolau, G. Vargas, Aprendizagem por interação: pequenas empresas em sistemas produtivos e inovativos locais. In: H. Lastres, J. Cassiolato & M. Maciel (orgs) Pequena Empresa. Cooperação e desenvolvimento local. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumarà, pp. 51–65. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Carlile, A pragmatic view of knowledge and Boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4), 442–455 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Carlile, in Transferring, Translating and Transforming: An Integrative Relational Approach to Sharing and Assessing Knowledge Across Boundaries. 3rd Annual MIT/UCI Knowledge and Organizations Conference, Laguna Beach, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Cooper, M. Press, The Design Agenda. John Willey & Sons. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Das, B. Teng, A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J. Manag. 26(1), 31–61 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Di Pace, La rete di imprese. Istruzione per l’uso. Università Telematica Universitas Mercatorum, Roma. IV Edizione, Marzo (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elkington, Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win Business Strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manag. Rev. 36(2)(Winter), 90–100 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gilman, Sustainability: The State of the Movement. The essential threads of who we are and where we’re going. (1990). http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC25/Gilman.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2010

  • M. Goedkoop, C. Van Halen, H. Te Riele, P. Rommes, Product Service Systems, Ecological and Economic Basics, s.l.: report 1999/36, VROM. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gopalakrishnan, F. Damanpour, A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 25(1), 15–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Gorb, Design Management: Papers from the London Business School (Architecture, Design and Technology Press, London, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hall, in Sustainable Partnerships. Context n. 41, Summer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hocevar, E. Jansen, G. Thomas, Inter-organizational collaboration: addressing the challenge. Homel Secur Aff. 7—The 9/11 Essays (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Jansen, S. Hocevar, R. Rendon, G. Thomas, Interorganizational Collaborative Capacity: Development of a Database to Refine Instrumentation and Explore Pattern, Monterey, CA: Technical Report NPS-AM-08-148 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kloth, B. Applegate, in Inter-organizational collaboration & partnerships: a critical analysis. Network Annual Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Kogut, U. Zander, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 383–397 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Latour, in PROTEE Principles: Theoretical background, ed. by M. DURET, et al. Final Report of the PROTEE Project. Paris: Project Funded By The European Commission, 4th Framework Programme, pp. 14–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Lopes, M. Baldi, Redes como perspectiva de análise e como estrutura de governança: uma análise das diferentes contribuições. Revista de Administração Pública 43(5), 1007–1035 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Manzini, Design for Sustainability: How to Design Sustainable Solutions. (2006). http://www.sustainable-everyday.net. Accessed 15 May 2010

  • E. Manzini, C. Vezzoli, G. Clark, Product service systems: using an existing concept as a new approach to sustainability. J. Des. Res. 1(2) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Marchica, Reti Aziendali e problemi di finanziamento: teorie e ipotesi interpretative. In: F. Cafaggi, ed. Reti di impresa tra regolazione e norme sociali. Nuove sfide per diritto ed economia. Bologna:Il Mulino. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. McCormack, B2B Collaboration: What is it? (2001). http://www.drkresearch.org. Accessed 2 Dec 2012

  • A. Meroni, Strategic design: where are we now? reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strateg. Des. Res. J. 1(1), Jul-Dec, 31–38 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Mont, in Functional thinking. The role of functional sales and product service systems for a functional based society, Lund, Sweden: research report for the Swedish EPA, IIIEE Lund University, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Morelli, Social Innovation and New Industrial Contexts: Can Designers “Industrialize” Socially Responsible Solutions?. Des. Issues 23(4), Autumm, 3–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Mozota, Design Management using design to build brand value and corporate innovation (Allworth Press, New York, NY, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-creating Organization (Oxford Press, Oxford, UK, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Nonaka, A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.G.A. Nunes, Design Pilot Project as a Boundary Object: a strategy to foster sustainable design policies for Brazilian MSEs. Milan(Italy): PhD Thesis in Design. INDACO Department, Polytechnic of Milan (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Owen, Design Thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Des. Res. Q. 2(1) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Parker, E. Ford, in Principles for networked innovation. Learning lessons from the RSA Networks project. UK, RSA Networks project—NESTA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Perrow, in Small-firm Networks, in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, ed. by N. Nohria, R.G. Eccles (Boston: Harvard Business School) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Pound, S. Snapp, C. McDougall, A. Braun, in Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable livelihoods. UK, USA and Canada: Eathscan Publications Ltd., London Sterling, V.A International Development (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Redclift, Sustainable development (1987–2005)—and oxymoron comes of age. Horizontes Antropologicos, Porto Alegre 12(25), 65–84 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Ricciardi, Strategie di cooperazione tra aziende e mitigazione del rischio operativo: i vantaggi competitivi delle reti di imprese in Airoldi, G.; Corbetta, G; Invernizzi, G. Economia Aziendale & Management. Scritti in onore di Vittorio Coda. Egea: Milano. CD: ISBN 978-88-238-1104-1. Printed: ISBN 978-88-238-4183-3. 368 p. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ricciardi, Le reti di imprese: aspetti gestionali, normative, fiscali. Rivista Amministrazione & Finanza. n.8/2013. Inserto. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Rosenfeld, Does cooperation enhance competitiveness: assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration. Res. Policy 25(2), 247–263 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • A. Rossi Filho, A. Meroni, C. Monti, R. Galisai, São Paulo Design Visions: Strategic design as an agent of dialog and transformation. Strategi. Des. Res. J., Jul-Oct 2(2), 56–63 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Sabatier, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 21, 129–168 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Star, J.R. Griesemer, Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. August, 19(3), 387–420 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Swan, S. Newell, H. Scarbrough, D. Hislop, Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking. J. Knowl. Manag. 3(4), 262–275 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Szulanski, Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice with the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 27–43 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Tellioǧlu, Modeling coordinated work: Definition and application of the Model ‘Coordinated Work Environment’. J. Supercomput. Int. J. High-Perform. Comput. Des. Anal. Use 24, 161–171 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Tellioǧlu, in CoMex—A Mechanism for Coordination of Task Execution in Group Work. Porto, Portugal, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computer Supported Activity Coordination, CSAC, in conjunction with ICEIS, pp. 13–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Tellioǧlu, Collaboration Life Cycle (Institute of Design and Assessment of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Tischner, in Design for Sustainability: where are we and where do we need to go? ed. by F. Ceschin, C. Vezzoli, J. Zhang. Sustainability in Design: Now!. Bangalore, India: Proceedings of the LeNS Conference, pp. 79–84 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Todeva, D. Knoke, Strategic alliances & models of collaboration. Manag. Decis. 43(1), 1–22 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tomael, A. Alcara, I. Di Chiara, Das redes socias à inovação. Ci. Inf., Brasília, 34(2), 93–104 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Topalian, Promoting design leadership through training. Design Leadership Forum (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Tsai, Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Res. Policy 38, 765–778 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Van de Ven, Central problems in the Management of Innovation. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 590–607 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Van den Bosch, J. Rotmans, in Deepening, Broadening and Scaling up. A framework for Steering Transition Experiments. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System, Innovations and Transitions (KCT) (2008

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Von Krogh, K. Ichijo, I. Nonaka, Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and the release the Power of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • H. Vreugdenhil, P. Ker Rault, Pilot Projects for evidence-based policy-making: three pilot projects in the Rhine Basin. Ger. Policy Stud. 6(2), 115–151 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Vreugdenhil, J. Slinger, P. Ker Rault, Pilot projects in water management. Ecol. Soc. 15(3)(13) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Zurlo, Un modello di lettura per il Design Strategico: La relazione tra design e strategia dell’impresa contemporanea. Milano: PhD Thesis. Dipartimento INDACO. Politecnico di Milano. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Zurlo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zurlo, F., Nunes, V.d.G.A. (2016). Theoretical Background. In: Designing Pilot Projects as Boundary Objects. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23141-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23141-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23140-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23141-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics