Advertisement

Reliable and Scalable Architecture for Internet of Things for Sensors Using Soft-Core Processor

  • U. V. Rane
  • V. R. Gad
  • R. S. GadEmail author
  • G. M. Naik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9247)

Abstract

With significant technological developments as well as advances in sensors, wireless communications and Internet – a lot of research areas have emerged, such as wearable computing, context-aware homes, mobile phone sensing and smart vehicle systems. From those emerging areas, there is a clear trend to augment the physical devices/objects with sensing, computing & communication capabilities, connect them together to form a network and make use of the collective effect of networked smart things − the Internet of Things(IoT). This paper proposes the IoT architecture “Kaivalyam” for sensors/actuator. The configurable interface generates the identity of the ‘Thing’ and stores in 32-bit datagram. The various configuration of the 32-bit datagram from 4,8,12 and 16-bit device data and respective 14, 12, 10 and 8-bits duplicate identifier can scale the number of devices connected to design platform. These datagram’s read into FIFO of the Triple Speed Ethernet (TSE) for transmission using Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) encoder. Simulation studies for the system were performed for block length 512 bits, which is the minimum Ethernet frame length of 64 bytes. AWGN(Additive White Gaussian Noise) is introduced in the channel and BER(Bit Error Rate) is computed for different (1dB to 6dB) SNR(Signal to Noise Ratio) showing BER of 10-4 -4 to 10-5 can be achieved for SNR of 2.5 dB indicating the secured and reliable data transmission.

Keywords

Internet of Things Architecture Scheduling Ethernet and LDPC 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carrithers, M.: The Buddha: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krackhardt, D., Carley, K: A PCANS model of structure in organizations. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, California, June 1998Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kranz, M., Holleis, P., Schmidt, A.: Embedded Interaction Interacting with the Internet of Things, Internet of Things Track. IEEE Internet Computing (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartner’s hype cycle special report for 2011, Gartner Inc. (2012). http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/hype-cycles/
  5. 5.
    Giusto, D., Iera, A., Morabito, G., Atzori, L. (eds.) The Internet of Things. Springer (2010). ISBN: 978-1-4419-1673-0Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Shelby, Z.: ETSI M2M Standardization, March 16, 2009. http://zachshelby.org
  8. 8.
    Hui, J., Culler, D., Chakrabarti, S.: 6LoWPAN: Incorporating IEEE 802.15.4 Into the IP Architecture – Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, White Paper #3, January 2009. http://www.ipso-alliance.org
  9. 9.
    Fernandes, F.F., Gad, R.S., Gad, V.R., Lobo, S., Naik, G.M., Parab, J.S.: Embedded System Communication: A Control Platform for Ethernet –Enabled Systems. Circuit Cellar (255), October 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill, Jason, Szewczyk, Robert, Woo, Alec, Hollar, Seth, Culler, David, Pister, Kristofer: System architecture directions for networked sensors. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 35(11), 93–104 (2000). doi: 10.1145/356989.356998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Internet 3.0: The Internet of Things. © Analysys Mason Limited (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunkels, A., Vasseur, J.P.: IP for Smart Objects, Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, White Paper #1, September 2008. http://www.ipso-alliance.org
  13. 13.
    Darianian, M., Michael, M.P.: Smart home mobile RFID-based internet-of-things systems and services. In: 2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aberer, K., Hauswirth, M., Salehi, A.: Global Sensor Networks, Technical report LSIR-REPORT- 2006-001 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shim, Y., Kwon, T., Choi, Y.: SARIF: A novel framework for integrating wireless sensors and RFID networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 14, 50–56 (2007). doi: 10.1109/MWC.2007.4407227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sung, J., Sánchez López, T., Kim, D.: The EPC sensor network for RFID and WSN integration infrastructure. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    van Kranenburg, R., et al.: The Internet of Things. In: 1st Berlin Symposium on Internet and Society (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Internet of Things in 2020 ROADMAP FOR THE FUTURE, European Commission Information Society and media & European Technology Platform on Small Systems Integration, May 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundmaeker, H., et al.: Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things European Commission Information Society and media, March 2010Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tinoosh Mohsenin, Rice University: Design and Evaluation of FPGA-Based Gigabit-Ethernet/PCI Network Interface Card Thesis (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gad, V.R., Gad, R.S., Naik, G.M.: Performance analysis of gigabit ethernet standard for various physical media using triple speed ethernet IP core on FPGA. In: International Conference on Network Communications held in Delhi, India on May 25–27, 2012, AIRCC, ICCSEA & Springer and published in International Journal of Advances in Intelligent ComputingGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Triple Speed Ethernet Data Path Reference Design AN-483-June 2009 ver. 1.1 Altera Corporation (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Triple-Speed Ethernet MegaCore Function User Guide © December 2010 Altera Corporation Application Note 483 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan, W.E.: An introduction to LDPC codes, August 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sterling, B.: Shaping Things – Mediawork Pamphlets. The MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kushalnagar, N., Montenegro, G., Schumacher, C.: IPv6 Over Low- Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement, and Goals, IETF RFC 4919, August 2007Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review 3(3), 3–11 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    IEEE Sensors Journal 2(2), April 2002Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Biglarbegian, B., et al.: Optimized Microstrip AntennaArrays for Emerging Millimeter-Wave Wireless Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation 59(5), 1742–1747 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Reilly, T., Pahlka, J.: The ‘Web Squared’ Era, Forbes, September 2009Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Computer Law & Security Review 24(26), 23–30 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. V. Rane
    • 1
  • V. R. Gad
    • 1
  • R. S. Gad
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. M. Naik
    • 1
  1. 1.ALTERA SoC laboratory, Department of ElectronicsGoa UniversityGoaIndia

Personalised recommendations