Advertisement

State of the Art and Research Challenges for Public Flying Ubiquitous Sensor Networks

  • Andrey Koucheryavy
  • Andrey Vladyko
  • Ruslan KirichekEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9247)

Abstract

The article deals with theoretical and practical directions of Public Flying Ubiquitous Sensor Networks (FUSN-P) research. Considered the distinctive features of this type of networks from the existing ones. A wide range of issues is covered: from the methods of calculation FUSN to the new types of testing and model network structure for such networks. Presented a model network for full-scale experiment and solutions for the Internet of Things.

Keywords

Public flying ubiquitous sensor networks Public unmanned aerial vehicles Delay-Tolerant networks New type of testing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O.K., Temel, S.: Flying Ad-Hoc Networks: A Survey. Ad Hoc Networks 11(3), May 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sahingoz, O.K.: Networking Model in Flying Ad Hoc Networks (FANETs): Concepts and Challenges. Journal of Intelligent &Robotics Systems 74(1-2) (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh, S.K.: A Comprehensive Survey on Fanet: Challenges and Advancements. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 6(3) (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosati, S., Kruzelecki, K.; Heitz, G.; Floreano, D: Dynamic Routing for Flying Ad Hoc Networks. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=25 arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.4399
  5. 5.
    de Freitas, E.P., Heimfarth, T., Netto, I.F., Lino, C.E., Pereira, C.E., Ferreira, A.M., Wagner, F.R., Larsson, T.: UAV relay network to support WSN connectivity. Proceedings of the ICUMT 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orfanus, D., Eliassen, F., de Freitas, E.P.: Self-organizing relay network supporting remotely deployed sensor nodes in military operations. In: Proceedings of the 6 th ICUMT, St. Petersburg, Russia, 6-8 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosário, D., Zhao, Z., Braun, T., Cerqueira, E., Santos, A.: A comparative analysis of beaconless opportunistic routing protocols for video dissemination over flying ad-hoc networks. In: Balandin, S., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART 2014. LNCS, vol. 8638, pp. 253–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeLima, P., York, G., Pack, D.: Localization of ground targets using a flying sensor network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, 2006, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 1, pp. 5–7, June 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vasiliev, D.S., Meitis, D.S., Abilov, A.: Simulation-based comparison of AODV, OLSR and HWMP protocols for flying Ad Hoc networks. In: Balandin, S., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART 2014. LNCS, vol. 8638, pp. 245–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phuong, H., Yamamoto, H., Yamazaki, K.: Data synchronization method in DTN sensor network using autonomous air vehicle. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2014, Phoenix Park, Korea (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Akan, O.B., Chen, C., Fang, J., Su, W.: InterPlaNetary Internet: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Computer Networks 43 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Wailea Maui, Hawaii, USA, January 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koucheryavy, A., Salim, A.: Cluster head selection for homogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2009, Phoenix Park, Korea (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, D., Chung, Y.: Self-organization routing protocol supporting mobile nodes for wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the First International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences, vol. 2 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koucheryavy, A., Salim, A.: Prediction-based clustering algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2010, Phoenix Park, Korea (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Qadami, N., Laila, I., Koucheryavy, A., Saker Ahmad, A.: Mobility adaptive clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks with mobile nodes. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2015, Phoenix Park, Korea (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Attarzadeh, N., Mehrani, M.: A New Three Dimensional Clustering Method for Wireless Sensor Networks. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology 11(6), version 1.0, April 2011Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abakumov, P., Koucheryavy, A.: The cluster head selection algorithm in the 3D USN. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2014, Phoenix Park, Korea (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abakumov, P., Koucheryavy, A.: Clustering algorithm for 3D wireless mobile sensor network. In: The 15th International Conference on Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems, NEW2AN 2015. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2015 accepted)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirichek, R., Paramonov, A., Vareldzhyan, K.: Optimization of the UAV’s motion trajectory in flying ubiquitous sensor networks (FUSN). In: The 15th International Conference on Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems, NEW2AN 2015. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2015 accepted)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Futahi, A., Koucheryavy, A., Paramonov, A., Prokopiev, A.: Ubiquitous sensor networks in the heterogeneous LTE network. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2015, Phoenix Park, Korea (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Recommendation Q.3900. Methods of testing and model network architecture for NGN technical means testing as applied to public telecommunication networks. ITU-T, Geneva, July (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koucheryavy, A., Bogdanov, I., Paramonov, A.: The mobile sensor network life-time under different spurious flows intrusion. In: Balandin, S., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN 2013 and ruSMART 2013. LNCS, vol. 8121, pp. 312–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirichek, R., Paramonov, A., Koucheryavy, A.: Flying ubiquitous sensor networks as a quening system. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2015, Phoenix Park, Korea (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Touloupis, E., Meliones, A., Apostolacos, S.: Speech codes for high-quality voice over ZigBee applications: Evaluation and implementation challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 50(4), April 2012Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moltchanov, D., Koucheryavy, Y., Harju, J.: Cross-layer modeling of wireless channels for data-link and IP layer performance evaluation. Computer Communications 29(7), April 24, 2006Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dunaytsev, R., Moltchanov, D., Koucheryavy, Y., Harju, J.: Modeling TCP SACK performance over wireless channels with completely reliable ARQ/FEC. International Journal of Communication Systems 24(12), December 2011Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunaytsev, R., Koucheryavy, Y., Harju, J.: TCP NewReno throughput in the presence of correlated losses: the slow-but-steady variant. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrey Koucheryavy
    • 1
  • Andrey Vladyko
    • 1
  • Ruslan Kirichek
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of TelecommunicationsSaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations