Skip to main content

Visually Monitoring Multiple Perspectives of Business Process Compliance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management (BPM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9253))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A challenge for any enterprise is to ensure conformance of its business processes with imposed compliance rules. The latter may constrain multiple perspectives of a business process, including control flow, data, time, resources, and interactions with business partners. However, business process compliance cannot completely be decided at design time, but needs to be monitored during run time as well. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for visually monitoring business process compliance. As opposed to existing approaches, the framework supports the visual monitoring of all relevant process perspectives based on the extended Compliance Rule Graph (eCRG) language. Furthermore, it not only allows detecting compliance violations, but visually highlights their causes as well. Finally, the framework assists users in monitoring business process compliance and ensuring a compliant continuation of their running business processes.

This work was done within the research project C\(^3\)Pro funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under project number RE 1402/2-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Governatori, G., Sadiq, S.: The journey to business process compliance. In: Handbook of Research on BPM. IGI Global, pp. 426–454 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Ensuring business process compliance along the process life cycle. Technical Report 2011–06, Ulm University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ly, L.T., et al.: Integration and verification of semantic constraints in adaptive process management systems. Data & Knowl. Eng. 64(1), 3–23 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ly, L.T., et al.: A framework for the systematic comparison and evaluation of compliance monitoring approaches. In: EDOC 2013, pp. 7–16. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Kumar, A.: Towards visually monitoring multiple perspectives of business process compliance. In: CAiSE 2015 Forum, pp. 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Hints on how to face business process compliance. JISBD 2010, 26–32 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Mangler, J., Rinderle-Ma, S., Fdhila, W.: Towards compliance of cross-organizational processes and their changes. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 649–661. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Ly, L.T., Kumar, A., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Visual modeling of business process compliance rules with the support of multiple perspectives. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Semmelrodt, F., Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Modeling the resource perspective of business process compliance rules with the extended compliance rule graph. In: Bider, I., Gaaloul, K., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, H.A., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPMDS 2014 and EMMSAD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 175, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Knuplesch, D., Dadam, P.: Monitoring business process compliance using compliance rule graphs. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P., Kumar, A., Reichert, M., Qing, L., Ooi, B.-C., Damiani, E., Schmidt, D.C., White, J., Hauswirth, M., Hitzler, P., Mohania, M. (eds.) OTM 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 82–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Knuplesch, D., et al.: An operational semantics for the extended compliance rule graph language. Technical Report 2014–6, Ulm University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knuplesch, D., et al.: On the formal semantics of the extended compliance rule graph. Technical Report 2013–05, Ulm University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Where did i misbehave? Diagnostic information in compliance checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 262–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Beck, H.: Automatisierte Ãœberwachung von Business Process Compliance Regeln mit Daten-, Zeit-, Ressourcen- und Interaktions-Aspekten. Master Thesis, Ulm University, Germany (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Becker, J., et al.: Generalizability and applicability of model-based business process compliance-checking approaches. BuR - Business Research 5(2), 221–247 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fdhila, W., Rinderle-Ma, S., Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Change and compliance in collaborative processes. In: SCC 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alles, M., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M.: Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Inf. Sys. 22(2), 195–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Namiri, K., Stojanovic, N.: Pattern-based design and validation of business process compliance. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 59–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Conceptual model for online auditing. Decision Support Systems 50(3), 636–647 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Accorsi, R.: An approach to data-driven detective internal controls for processaware information systems. DUMW 2012, 29–33 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weidlich, M., Ziekow, H., Mendling, J., Günther, O., Weske, M., Desai, N.: Event-based monitoring of process execution violations. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 182–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos, E.A.P., Francisco, R., Vieira, A.D., de F.R. Loures, E., Busetti, M.A.: Modeling business rules for supervisory control of process-aware information systems. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 447–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: An operational decision support framework for monitoring business constraints. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 146–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Westergaard, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring business constraints with linear temporal logic: an approach based on colored automata. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Baumgrass, A., Baier, T., Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Conformance checking of RBAC policies in process-aware information systems. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 435–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Outmazgin, N., Soffer, P.: A process mining-based analysis of business process work-arounds. Soft. & Sys. Mod., 1–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Awad, A., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Specification, verification and explanation of violation for data aware compliance rules. In: Baresi, L., Chi, C.-H., Suzuki, J. (eds.) ICSOC-ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 5900, pp. 500–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Knuplesch, D., Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Pfeifer, H., Dadam, P.: On enabling data-aware compliance checking of business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 332–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Fdhila, W., Rinderle-Ma, S.: On enabling compliance of cross-organizational business processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 146–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Knuplesch, D., et al.: Ensuring compliance of distributed and collaborative workflows. In: CollaborateCom 2013, pp. 133–142. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Turetken, O., Elgammal, A., van den Heuvel, W.J., Papazoglou, M.: Capturing compliance requirements: A pattern-based approach. IEEE Software, 29–36 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sunkle, S., Kholkar, D., Kulkarni, V.: Toward better mapping between regulations and operational details of enterprises using vocabularies and semantic similarity. In: CAiSE 2015 Forum, pp. 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: DECLARE: full support for loosely-structured processes. EDOC 2007, 287–300 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hildebrandt, T., Mukkamala, R.R., Slaats, T.: Nested dynamic condition response graphs. In: Arbab, F., Sirjani, M. (eds.) FSEN 2011. LNCS, vol. 7141, pp. 343–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, R., Vaculín, R., Shan, Z., Nigam, A., Wu, F.: Business artifact-centric modeling for real-time performance monitoring. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 265–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Montali, M., et al.: Monitoring business constraints with the event calculus. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5(1), 17:1–17:30 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bragaglia, S., et al.: Fuzzy conformance checking of observed behaviour with expectations. In: AI*IA 2011, pp. 80–91 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Knuplesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Kumar, A. (2015). Visually Monitoring Multiple Perspectives of Business Process Compliance. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23062-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23063-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics