Abstract
A challenge for any enterprise is to ensure conformance of its business processes with imposed compliance rules. The latter may constrain multiple perspectives of a business process, including control flow, data, time, resources, and interactions with business partners. However, business process compliance cannot completely be decided at design time, but needs to be monitored during run time as well. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for visually monitoring business process compliance. As opposed to existing approaches, the framework supports the visual monitoring of all relevant process perspectives based on the extended Compliance Rule Graph (eCRG) language. Furthermore, it not only allows detecting compliance violations, but visually highlights their causes as well. Finally, the framework assists users in monitoring business process compliance and ensuring a compliant continuation of their running business processes.
This work was done within the research project C\(^3\)Pro funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under project number RE 1402/2-1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Governatori, G., Sadiq, S.: The journey to business process compliance. In: Handbook of Research on BPM. IGI Global, pp. 426–454 (2009)
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Ensuring business process compliance along the process life cycle. Technical Report 2011–06, Ulm University (2011)
Ly, L.T., et al.: Integration and verification of semantic constraints in adaptive process management systems. Data & Knowl. Eng. 64(1), 3–23 (2008)
Ly, L.T., et al.: A framework for the systematic comparison and evaluation of compliance monitoring approaches. In: EDOC 2013, pp. 7–16. IEEE (2013)
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Kumar, A.: Towards visually monitoring multiple perspectives of business process compliance. In: CAiSE 2015 Forum, pp. 41–48
Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Hints on how to face business process compliance. JISBD 2010, 26–32 (2010)
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Mangler, J., Rinderle-Ma, S., Fdhila, W.: Towards compliance of cross-organizational processes and their changes. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 649–661. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Ly, L.T., Kumar, A., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Visual modeling of business process compliance rules with the support of multiple perspectives. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Semmelrodt, F., Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Modeling the resource perspective of business process compliance rules with the extended compliance rule graph. In: Bider, I., Gaaloul, K., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, H.A., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPMDS 2014 and EMMSAD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 175, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Knuplesch, D., Dadam, P.: Monitoring business process compliance using compliance rule graphs. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P., Kumar, A., Reichert, M., Qing, L., Ooi, B.-C., Damiani, E., Schmidt, D.C., White, J., Hauswirth, M., Hitzler, P., Mohania, M. (eds.) OTM 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 82–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Knuplesch, D., et al.: An operational semantics for the extended compliance rule graph language. Technical Report 2014–6, Ulm University (2014)
Knuplesch, D., et al.: On the formal semantics of the extended compliance rule graph. Technical Report 2013–05, Ulm University (2013)
Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Where did i misbehave? Diagnostic information in compliance checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 262–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Beck, H.: Automatisierte Ãœberwachung von Business Process Compliance Regeln mit Daten-, Zeit-, Ressourcen- und Interaktions-Aspekten. Master Thesis, Ulm University, Germany (2014)
Becker, J., et al.: Generalizability and applicability of model-based business process compliance-checking approaches. BuR - Business Research 5(2), 221–247 (2012)
Fdhila, W., Rinderle-Ma, S., Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M.: Change and compliance in collaborative processes. In: SCC 2015 (2015)
Alles, M., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M.: Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Inf. Sys. 22(2), 195–214 (2008)
Namiri, K., Stojanovic, N.: Pattern-based design and validation of business process compliance. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 59–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Conceptual model for online auditing. Decision Support Systems 50(3), 636–647 (2011)
Accorsi, R.: An approach to data-driven detective internal controls for processaware information systems. DUMW 2012, 29–33 (2012)
Weidlich, M., Ziekow, H., Mendling, J., Günther, O., Weske, M., Desai, N.: Event-based monitoring of process execution violations. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 182–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Santos, E.A.P., Francisco, R., Vieira, A.D., de F.R. Loures, E., Busetti, M.A.: Modeling business rules for supervisory control of process-aware information systems. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 447–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: An operational decision support framework for monitoring business constraints. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 146–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Westergaard, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring business constraints with linear temporal logic: an approach based on colored automata. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Baumgrass, A., Baier, T., Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Conformance checking of RBAC policies in process-aware information systems. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 435–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Outmazgin, N., Soffer, P.: A process mining-based analysis of business process work-arounds. Soft. & Sys. Mod., 1–15 (2014)
Awad, A., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Specification, verification and explanation of violation for data aware compliance rules. In: Baresi, L., Chi, C.-H., Suzuki, J. (eds.) ICSOC-ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 5900, pp. 500–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Knuplesch, D., Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Pfeifer, H., Dadam, P.: On enabling data-aware compliance checking of business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 332–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Fdhila, W., Rinderle-Ma, S.: On enabling compliance of cross-organizational business processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 146–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Knuplesch, D., et al.: Ensuring compliance of distributed and collaborative workflows. In: CollaborateCom 2013, pp. 133–142. IEEE (2013)
Turetken, O., Elgammal, A., van den Heuvel, W.J., Papazoglou, M.: Capturing compliance requirements: A pattern-based approach. IEEE Software, 29–36 (2012)
Sunkle, S., Kholkar, D., Kulkarni, V.: Toward better mapping between regulations and operational details of enterprises using vocabularies and semantic similarity. In: CAiSE 2015 Forum, pp. 229–236
Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: DECLARE: full support for loosely-structured processes. EDOC 2007, 287–300 (2007)
Hildebrandt, T., Mukkamala, R.R., Slaats, T.: Nested dynamic condition response graphs. In: Arbab, F., Sirjani, M. (eds.) FSEN 2011. LNCS, vol. 7141, pp. 343–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Liu, R., VaculÃn, R., Shan, Z., Nigam, A., Wu, F.: Business artifact-centric modeling for real-time performance monitoring. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 265–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Montali, M., et al.: Monitoring business constraints with the event calculus. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5(1), 17:1–17:30 (2014)
Bragaglia, S., et al.: Fuzzy conformance checking of observed behaviour with expectations. In: AI*IA 2011, pp. 80–91 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Knuplesch, D., Reichert, M., Kumar, A. (2015). Visually Monitoring Multiple Perspectives of Business Process Compliance. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23062-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23063-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)