Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of research on principals’ roles, work, and leadership conducted in a Norwegian context and how these studies may offer insight into the work of school principals more broadly.
Research on school leadership is recent in Norway, with the first studies on educational leadership taking place in the 1990s. However, the research interest intensified after the new millennium when new governance structures affected the roles and responsibilities of school principals.
Among the unique contributions of the many studies included in this review is a greater sensitivity to variations in organizational context and a greater focus on the identity and role of leadership. Most studies have qualitative designs that add to the knowledge base, but the studies are often guided by perspectives that are not revisited in subsequent studies, and as such, to some degree the research tends to be less cumulative. The international literature is, however, used to inform the research on school leadership in Norway, to create the warrant for the study in question, and to identify the contribution that the study will make.
So far, the empirical evidence of different forms of leadership remains limited, and a few studies have explored the effects of leadership on school and student outcomes and applied a quantitative approach. In addition, relatively few case studies are part of a bigger international research design or include mixed methods approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The 430 municipalities in Norway are responsible for the 10 years of compulsory education at the primary and lower secondary school levels. The municipalities vary in size as well as in the level of welfare.
- 2.
Currently, there are 15 ongoing Ph.D. projects that will be finalized within the next couple of years, all written in English. They are all within the format of an article-based dissertation, a format that has become more common during the last 5 years. It is argued that Ph.D. students should be encouraged to publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals as a strategy for increased internationalization of research conducted in the Norwegian context. An extended abstract will summarize and create unity based on the articles in the thesis. Five published papers that are rooted in these projects are included in this review.
- 3.
There are commissioned reports that are of importance to understanding how Norwegian principals perceive and frame their roles. The Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation (NIFU) has, for example, been commissioned by the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training during the last 4 years to map school leaders’ opinions of specific themes where evidence can support the formulation and monitoring of policy (Vibe and Hovdhaugen 2012). However, even though these reports indicate some trends in principals’ understanding of responsibilities and challenges, they are mainly descriptive statistics and do not include more theoretical analysis of the findings.
- 4.
The Norwegian team could not select schools based on their academic performance and had to use a different set of criteria for selecting the cases because there were no public test results or inspection reports to base choices of successful principals when this project started in 2003.
- 5.
The data was collected for two periods, from 2007 to 2008 and 2010–2011.
- 6.
A project funded by the Research Council of Norway, focusing on legal standards and the professional judgment of school leaders (2012–2016), will add to this knowledge base in the future.
References
Aas, M. (2009). Diskusjonens kraft. En longitudinell studie av et skoleutviklingsprosjekt der leseeksperter/forskere støtter rektorer og lærere ved sju skoler i utvikling av skolens leseundervisning [The power of dialogue. A longitudinal study of a school improvement project where researchers supported principals and teachers at seven schools in developing their capacity for reading instruction]. Avhandling til PhD-graden. PhD-thesis, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.
Andersen, F. C., & Ottesen, E. (2011). School leadership and ethnic diversity: Approaching the challenge. Intercultural Education, 22(4), 285–299.
Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change. An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 173–189.
Elstad, E., Christophersen, K. A., & Turmo, A. (2011). Social exchange theory as an explanation of organizational citizenship behaviour among teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(4), 405–421.
Emstad, A. B. (2012). Rektors engasjement i arbeidet med oppfølging av skolevurdering. En kvalitativ kasusstudie av hvordan seks norsk barneskoler har brukt skolevurdering i sitt arbeid med forbedring av skolen som læringsarena [The principal’s involvement in school-based evaluation. A qualitative case-study of how six primary schools use school-based evaluation to improve the school as an arena for learning]. Trondheim: Avhandling for Ph.D. graden ved NTNU.
Emstad, A. B., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). The role of leadership in evaluation utilization. Cases from Norwegian primary schools. Nordic Studies in Education, 31(4), 245–256.
Engeland, Ø., Langfeldt, G., & Roald, K. (2008). Kommunalt handlingsrom: Hvordan forholder norske kommuner seg til ansvarsstyring i skolen? [Municipal autonomy: How do Norwegian municipalities cope with managerial accountability?]. In I. G. Langfeldt, E. Elstad, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Ansvarlighet i skolen. Politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar [Accountability in schools. Political issues and educational responses] (pp. 178–203). Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk forlag.
Gunter, H. (2005). Conceptualizing research in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 33(2), 165–180.
Gunter, H., & Ribbins, P. (2002). Leadership studies in education: Towards a map of the field. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 30(4), 387–416.
Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2007). Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study on teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 232–249.
Helstad, K. (2013). Kunnskapsutvikling blant lærere i videregående skole. En studie av et skoleutviklingsprosjekt om skriving i og på tvers av fag [Knowledge development among teachers in upper secondary schools. A study of a school development project on writing in and across disciplines]. Avhandling for PhD-graden. PhD-thesis, Det utdanningsvitenskapelige fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo.
Helstad, K., & Møller, J. (2013). Leadership as relational work. Risks and opportunities. Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(3), 245–262.
Homme, A. D. (2008). Den kommunale skolen. Betingelser for utforming av det lokale skolefeltet i et historisk perspektiv [The municipal school. Conditions for local school development in a historical perspective]. Avhandling for Dr.polit. grad. PhD-thesis, Institutt for administrasjon og organisasjonsvitenskap. Universitetet i Bergen.
Imsen, G. (2004). Skolens ledelse, skolens kultur og praksis i klasserommet: Er det noen sammenheng? [School leadership, school culture and classroom practices: What is the connection?]. In G. Imsen (Ed.), Det ustyrlige klasserommet. Om styring, samarbeid og læringsmiljø i grunnskolen [The unruly classroom. About governing, cooperation and learning environment in compulsory schools] (pp. 144–164). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Irgens, E. J. (2010). Rom for arbeid: Lederen som konstruktør av den gode skole [Leeway for work: Constructing the good school]. In R. A. Andreassen, E. J. Irgens, & E. M. Skaalvik (red.), Kompetent skoleledelse [Competent school leadership] (s. 125–146). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
Jensen, R. (2014). Leadership development as boundary work. Inspired moments and longitudinal efforts. PhD- thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.
Jensen, R., & Møller, J. (2013). School data as mediators in professional develop. Journal of Educational Change, 14(1), 95–112.
Langfeldt, G., Elstad, E., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.). (2008). Ansvarlighet i skolen. Politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar [Accountability in schools. Political issues and educational responses]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk forlag.
Larsen, T. (2005). Evaluating principals and teachers implementation of second step. A case study of four Norwegian primary schools. Bergen: University of Bergen, HEMIL.
Lund, T., Rotvold, L. A., Skrøvset, S., & Stjernstrøm, E. (2010). Dialogkonferanser som læringsarena og pedagogisk utviklingsverktøy [Dialogue conferences as tools for learning and development]. FoU i praksis, 4(1), 47–64.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. Abingdon/London: Routledge.
Mausethagen, S. (2013). (Re)shaping teacher professionalism. An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increased accountability. PhD- thesis, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway.
Mausethagen, S., & Granlund, L. (2012). Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ unions. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 815–833.
Møller, J. (2004). Lederidentiteter i skolen. Posisjonering, forhandlinger og tilhørighet [Leadership identities in schools. Positioning, negotiation and belonging]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Møller, J. (2006). Democratic schooling in Norway: Implications for leadership in practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(1), 53–69.
Møller, J. (2007). Educational leadership and the new language of learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(1), 31–49.
Møller, J. (2008). Living with accountability and mandated change – Leadership for learning in a Norwegian context. In J. MacBeath & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for learning. International perspectives (pp. 241–258). Rotterdam: SENSE Publishers.
Møller, J. (2009). Learning to share: A vision of leadership practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(3), 253–268.
Møller, J. (2012). The construction of a public face as a school principal. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(5), 452–460.
Møller, J., & Ottesen, E. (2011). Building leadership capacity: The Norwegian approach. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 619–635). Dordrecht: Springer.
Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernizing education: NPM reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(4), 336–354.
Møller, J., Eggen, A., Fuglestad, O. L., Langfeldt, G., Presthus, A. M., Skrøvset, S., Stjernstrøm, E., & Vedøy, G. (2005). Successful school leadership – The Norwegian case. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 584–594.
Møller, J, Eggen, A. B., Fuglestad, O. L, Langfeldt, G., Presthus, A. -M., Skrøvset, S, Stjernstrøm, E., Vedøy, G. (2007). Successful leadership based on democratic values. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.). Successful principal leadership in times of change. An international perspective (pp. 71–86). Springer Publishing Company.
Møller, J., Sivesind, K., Skedsmo, G., & Aas, M. (2006). Skolelederundersøkelsen 2005. Om arbeidsforhold, evalueringspraksis og ledelse i skolen [Principal survey 2005. About working conditions, evaluation practices, and leadership in schools]. Acta Didactica, nr. 1. Universitetet i Oslo.
Møller, J., Vedøy, G., Presthus, A. M., & Skedsmo, G. (2009). Successful principalship – Sustainable ethos and incremental changes? Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 731–741.
Møller, J., Prøitz, T., Rye, E., & Aasen, P. (2013). Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform. [The knowledge promotion as a governing reform]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reforming and reforming. About change and continuity in compulsory education (pp. 23–42). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Myhre, H. (2010). Den sosiale konstruksjonen av rektorposisjonen i grunnskolen. En kasusstudie av relasjonen mellom rektorer og lærere i tre norske grunnskoler [The social construction of the principal’s position in compulsory schools. A case-study of the relationship between principals and teachers in three Norwegian schools]. PhD- thesis, Fakultetet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, NTNU, Norway.
Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.
Ottesen, E. (2011). Ledelse gjennom samtaler [Leadership as communication]. In J. Møller & E. Ottesen (Eds.), Rektor som sjef og leder. Om styring, ledelse og kunnskapsutvikling i skolen [The principal as a manager and leader. About governing, leadership and knowledge development in schools] (pp. 265–284). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Paulsen, J. M. (2008). Managing adaptive learning from the middle. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Series of Dissertations 4/2008. BI, Norwegian School of Management, Department of Leadership and Organizational Management, Norway.
Postholm, M. B. (2011). A completed research and development work project in school: The teachers’ learning and possibilities, premises and challenges for further development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 560–568.
Presthus, A. M. (2010). Dialog, interaksjon og verdier. En studie av tre rektorers arbeid i hverdagen [Dialogue, interaction and values. A study of the practices of three principals]. Avhandling til PhD- graden. PhD-thesis, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.
Roald, K. (2010). Kvalitetsvurdering som organisasjonslæring mellom skole og skoleeigar [Evaluation as organizational learning across different levels]. PhD- thesis, Universitetet i Bergen, Norway.
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
Sivesind, K., & Bachmann, K. (2011). Et felles nasjonalt tilsyn – om forholdet mellom statlig styring og faglig skjønn [National inspection – The relationship between state governing and professional discretion]. In J. Møller & E. Ottesen (Eds.), Rektor som sjef og leder. Om styring, ledelse og kunnskapsutvikling i skolen [The principal as a manager and leader. About governing, leadership and knowledge development in schools] (pp. 51–74). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition? Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy. Doctoral thesis. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sugrue, C. (Ed.). (2005). Passionate principalship: Learning from life histories of school leaders. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Vedøy, G. (2008). “En elev er en elev”, “barn er barn” og “folk er folk”. Ledelse i flerkulturelle skoler [“A student is a student, a child is a child and people are people”. Leadership in multicultural schools]. PhD- thesis, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo, Norway.
Vedøy, G., & Møller, J. (2007). Successful school leadership for diversity. Examining two contrasting examples of working for democracy in Norway. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 58–67.
Vennebo, K., & Ottesen, E. (2012). School leadership: Constitution and distribution. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 255–270.
Vibe, N., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2012). Spørsmål til Skole-Norge høsten 2012. Resultater og analyser fra Utdanningsdirektoratets spørreundersøkelse blant skoler og skoleeiere [Survey 2012. Findings and analyses based on a survey to schools and local educational authorities]. NIFU, Rapport 47/2012.
Welstad, T. (2011). Skoleledere som rettsanvendere [Legal standards and school leaders discretion]. In J. Møller & E. Ottesen (Eds.), Rektor som sjef og leder. Om styring, ledelse og kunnskapsutvikling i skolen [The principal as a manager and leader. About governing, leadership and knowledge development in schools] (pp. 119–147). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Møller, J. (2016). Norway: Researching Norwegian Principals. In: Ärlestig, H., Day, C., Johansson, O. (eds) A Decade of Research on School Principals. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23027-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23027-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23026-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23027-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)