Abstract
Triple Helix (TH) is a concept well known, understood, and applied by many Asian Multinationals (AMNC), and it plays an important role for economic growth and regional development. It seems to be influenced by networks and partnerships and their complexity as well. Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) has been widely acknowledged in international literature and practiced as a vital element of business performance. CE mainly relates to a corporate management style that integrates risk-taking and innovative approaches, as well as reward and motivational techniques that are more traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship. By encouraging innovation and enriching business performance, CE offers great fundamentals for cooperative development between the government, educational institutes, and businesses. In a constantly demanding environment, the dual forces of technological change and globalisation-heightened competition do have an impact on the way how businesses operate. To cope with this, organizations should fully understand the different meanings of CE, at any level, and try to apply it properly to all decisions made in the framework of TH’s cooperation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Clarifying intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7–24.
Asia Triple Helix Society. (2014). Vitalising research on university-industry-government relations and WSI in Asian countries. Retrieved June 18, 2014, from http://www.asia-triplehelix.org.
Belousova, O., & Gailly, B. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship in a dispersed setting: Actors, behaviors, and process. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 361–377.
Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon – On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2), 253–273.
Brainport Monitor. (2012). Summary, Power the smartest. Retrieved April 12, 2014, from http://www.brainport.nl.
Bressers, N. (2012). The triple helix organisation in practice: Assessment of the triple helix in a Dutch sustainable mobility program. Science & Public Policy, 39(5), 669–679.
Corbett, A., Covin, J. G., O’Connor, G. C., & Tucci, C. L. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship: State-of-the-art research and a future research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 812–820.
Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47–65.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 7–25.
Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Springer.
Dess, G., Lumpkin, G. T., & McGee, J. E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 85–102.
Ernst & Young. (2012). Beyond Asia: Strategies to support the quest for growth. South Korea Highlights. Facts on Asia’, originally published by UNCTAD, IMF, Oxford Economics. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.ey.com.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42, 293–337.
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243–255.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Dzisah, J., & Zhou, C. (2007). University-industry-government interaction: the Triple Helix Model of innovation. Asia Pacific Tech Monitor, 24(1), 14–23.
Fogelberg, H., & Thorpenberg, S. (2012). Regional innovation policy and public-private partnership: The case of Triple Helix Arenas in Western Sweden. Science and Public Policy, 39, 347–356.
Frederick, H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, practice. South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning Australia.
Government of the Netherlands. (2014). Investing in top sectors. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.government.nl.
Hanze Research Portal. (2014). Professorships. Retrieved May 23, 2014, from www.hanze.nl.
Hayton, J., Hornsby, J., & Bloodgood, J. (2013). Part II: The contribution of HRM to corporate entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for future research. Management, 16(4), 381–409.
Holland Trade. (2014). The triple helix in Dutch Life Sciences Health. Retrieved February 18, 2014, from http://www.hollandtrade.com.
Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Holt, D. T., & Wales, W. Y. (2013). Assessing a measurement of organizational. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 937–955.
Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253–273.
Ireland, R., Covin, J., & Kuratko, D. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1), 19–46.
Kuratko, D. F., Montagno, R. V., & Hornsby, J. S. (1990). Developing an entrepreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue), 49–58.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.leydesdorff.net.
Leydesdorff, L., & Heimeriks, G. (2001). The self-organisation of the European Information Society: The case of ‘biotechnology”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(14), 1262–1274.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.
Noorderlink. (2014). About Noorderlink. Retrieved May 10, 2014, from http://www.noorderlink.nl.
Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and The Netherlands. Using Triple Helix Indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3–27.
Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. ‘Why you don’t have to leave corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
Pinchot, G., & Pellman, R. (1999). Intrapreneuring in action. A handbook for business innovation. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Köhler Publishers, Inc.
Pirich, A. (2001). An interface between entrepreneurship and innovation: New Zealand SMEs perspective. Paper prepared for the 2001 DRUID Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 48 p.
Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 23(3), 11–27.
The Economist. (2014a). A world to conquer, May 31st, 2014.
The Economist. (2014b). How to keep roaring? May 31st, 2014.
TMC. (2014). Brainport Eindhoven Region. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://www.tmcporch.com.
Transumo. (2009). Transumo 2004–9. Retrieved December 31, 2014, from http://www.transumo.nl.
Utrecht University. (2014). Research Asia. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://www.uu.nl.
Volkskrant. (2011). Negen kandidaten voor 1,5 mld subsidie, February 5th, 2011.
Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(5), 895–923.
Zahra, S. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.
Zahra, S., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix
Asia Highlights
-
Rapid-growth markets from Asia represent the fastest-growing economic region in the world, with an annual growth forecast at more than 6 % a year.
-
The IMF expects advanced economies to grow by just 1.4 % in 2012 and 2 % in 2013. The corresponding figure for East and Southeast Asia in 2013 is 7.9 %.
-
Since 2000, Asia has been the fastest-growing source of foreign direct investment (FDI). Its businesses currently produce a quarter of the world’s exports (US$3.77 trillion in 2010) and form 87 of the Fortune Global 500 largest firms.
-
FDI outflows from East and Southeast Asia recorded a compound annual growth rate of 22.9 % in 2005–2011, jumping from US$70 billion to US$242 billion.
-
Investors from East and Southeast Asia are major drivers of growth in global foreign direct investment (FDI) outflows, making up 16 % of the world’s total FDI (up from just 7 % in 2005) and driven by increased outflows from mainland China, Hong Kong (SAR), Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.
-
Intra-regional trade is expanding rapidly, reflecting the shift towards higher consumption in Asia. China leads the way in terms of outflows and destination, with growth for Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam close behind.
-
Trade flows from Asia to the US and Canada, the Middle East, Latin America and Africa are expected to increase by over 10 % a year up to 2020.
-
Cross-border M&A purchases are consuming an ever-larger slice of FDI flows, with purchases from Asia reaching a record US$94 billion in 2010.
-
The China-US trade route is forecast to see the biggest increase in the world, predicted to rise by almost US$700 billion by 2020.
(Ernst and Young 2012)
Notes
Case studies, presented as best practices of the Triple Helix System in the Netherlands, have been limited only to a brief description. For more details, please contact the engaged institutions directly.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soltanifar, M. (2016). Corporate Enterpreneurship and Triple Helix. In: Segers, R. (eds) Multinational Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23012-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23012-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23011-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23012-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)