Skip to main content

South Africa’s Quest for Leadership in Africa: Achievements, Constraints and Dilemmas

  • Chapter
Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter looks at South Africa from a regional perspective. It contends that although South Africa is willing to act as a leader in Africa, and has the political, diplomatic and economic means to do so, the country’s dominance in Africa is not only contested, especially by rival regional powers, such as Nigeria and by African elites who perceive the country to be un-African and pro-West; but is also incomplete. The chapter argues that acceptance of South Africa’s status as a leader on the African continent is by no means uncontested, especially outside of the immediate Southern African sub-region. There are clear regional dimensions to how South Africa is able to project its leadership ambitions and credentials in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Originally conceived by the Senegalese scholar Cheikh Anta Diop, the idea of the African Renaissance was popularised by Mbeki.

  2. 2.

    This point was made during a discussion with a senior South African diplomat.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Mbeki was the intellectual architect of NEPAD and its first chairman, and, from the outset was determined to ensure that NEPAD (and later the AU Parliament) would be headquartered in South Africa.

  5. 5.

    The Inclusive Government was disbanded following ZANU-PF’s overwhelming victory in the 2013 general election.

  6. 6.

    In contrast, the presence of South African troops in other war-torn regions such as the DRC and Darfur in western Sudan is backed by UN resolutions.

  7. 7.

    Since coming into effect in 2000, the SADC Protocol on Trade has served as the principal mechanism driving economic integration and tariff liberalisation in the region. The tariff reforms enshrined in the Protocol have been implemented through a schedule of annual tariff phase downs which, in the case of most signatories (but not South Africa), have been heavily back-loaded with the majority of the tariff reduction occurring in the latter stages of the implementation period.

  8. 8.

    The new SACU treaty, which replaced the previous SACU agreement of 1969, has facilitated a democratisation of SACU policies and decision-making processes. The revised agreement also paved the way for a revision of the SACU revenue sharing formula used to determine revenue allocations from the common revenue pool to the SACU Member States.

  9. 9.

    An influential affiliate of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, which is, in turn, a member of the ruling ANC alliance.

References

  • Adebajo, A. (2007). South Africa and Nigeria in Africa: An axis of virtue? In A. Adebajo, A. Adedeji, & C. Landsberg (Eds.), South Africa in Africa: The post-apartheid era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebajo, A. (2014, May 5). A humbler SA would be a good thing for Africa. Business Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebajo, A., & Landsberg, C. (2004, February 13–19). Obasanjo, Mbeki as thick as thieves. Mail & Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • African Economic Outlook. (2013). Traditional partners remain key and keep growing. Accessed from http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/in-depth/emerging-partners/africa-pushes-aside-post-colonialism/traditional-partners-remain-key-and-keep-growing/

  • Alden, C., & le Pere, G. (2003). South Africa’s post-apartheid foreign policy: From reconciliation to revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, G. (2013, April 3). South Africa’s military adventurism: A dangerous shift in foreign policy. The South African Civil Society Information Service. Accessed from: http://www.sacsis.org.za/site/article/1622

  • Besharati, N. (2013, August). South African development aid agency: Strategic aid or development packages for Africa? Research Report 12, Economic Diplomacy Programme, South African Institute of International Affairs. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, T. A., & Mills, K. (2011). Explaining post-apartheid South African human rights foreign policy: Unsettled identity and unclear interests. Journal of Human Rights, 10, 76–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. (2007). South Africa: ‘Exporting peace’ to the Great Lakes region? In A. Adebajo, A. Adedeji, & C. Landsberg (Eds.), South Africa in Africa: The post-apartheid era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemes, D. (2009). Regional power South Africa: Co-operative hegemony constrained by historical legacy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 27(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopaldas, R. (2013, May 24). Why Nigeria and India would make excellent bedfellows. Business Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar, N. (2004). Every continent needs an America: The experience of South African firms doing business in Mozambique. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, A. (2009). South Africa’s foreign policy: Hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs, 16(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansard. (1996). Debates of the National Assembly. Cape Town: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengari, A. T. (2013, April 22). South Africa after the Central African Republic: Saving the African agenda. South African Institute of International Affairs. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J., & Mills, G. (2003). The future of Africa: A new order in sight? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, C. (2007). South Africa and the making of the African Union and NEPAD: Mbeki’s ‘progressive African agenda’. In A. Adebajo, A. Adedeji, & C. Landsberg (Eds.), South Africa in Africa: The post-apartheid era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1993). South Africa’s future foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 72(5), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar, D., & Paterson, M. (2012, June 9–10). The eagle and the springbok: Strengthening the Nigeria/South Africa relationship. Centre for Conflict Resolution Policy Advisory Group Seminar Report. Cape Town: Centre for Conflict Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Planning Commission. (2011). National development plan: Vision for 2030. Pretoria: National Planning Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2010). Angola-Zimbabwe relations: A study in the search for regional alliances. The Round Table, 99(411), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepad Secretariat. (2001). New partnerships for Africa’s development. Midrand: Nepad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbobine, J. (2014, April 24). Nigeria’s GDP rebasing… bigger but not better. Business Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M. (2013, May 24). Anniversary prompts African reflection. Business Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qobo, M. (2012, May). South Africa’s foreign policy: An assessment of the draft white paper and the ANC’s policy document on international relations. South African Foreign Policy Initiative Brief No. 2. Cape Town: Open Society Foundation for South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman, M. (2003). South Africa as an emerging middle power: 1994–2003. In J. Daniel, A. Habib, & R. Southall (Eds.), State of the Nation: South Africa (pp. 2003–2004). Pretoria: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman, M. (2007). South Africa in Africa: Behemoth, hegemon, partner or ‘just another kid on the block’? In A. Adebajo, A. Adedeji, & C. Landsberg (Eds.), South Africa in Africa: The post-apartheid era. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidiropoulos, E. (2008). South African foreign policy in the post-Mbeki period. South African Journal of International Affairs, 15(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soko, M. (2010). Building regional integration in Southern Africa: Southern African Customs Union as a driving force? South African Journal of International Affairs, 15(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soko, M., & Balchin, N. (2009). South Africa’s policy towards Zimbabwe: A nexus between foreign policy and commercial interests? South African Journal of International Affairs, 16(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soko, M., & Qobo, M. (2011, March 25). Regional wrangling mustn’t hamper SA growth. Mail & Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. (2011). Between a rock and a hard place: Small states in the EU-SADC EPA negotiations. The Round Table, 100(413), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mills Soko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soko, M., Balchin, N. (2016). South Africa’s Quest for Leadership in Africa: Achievements, Constraints and Dilemmas. In: Kingah, S., Quiliconi, C. (eds) Global and Regional Leadership of BRICS Countries. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22972-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics