Skip to main content

Sensitive Business Process Modeling for Knowledge Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9262))

Abstract

Currently, modern organizations are characterized by collaborative, highly dynamic, complex and highly intensive knowledge processes. They are all the more aware of the need to effectively identify, preserve, share and use the knowledge mobilized by their business processes. Thus, in order to improve their performance, business process modeling has become a primary concern for any organization in order to improve the management of its individual and collective knowledge assets. This paper proposes a new meta-model of sensitive business processes modeling for knowledge management, called BPM4KI (Business Process Meta-Model for Knowledge Identification) based on COOP, a core ontology of organization’s processes. The aim of this meta-model is to help identify and localize the crucial knowledge that is mobilized and created by these processes. Moreover, it has been illustrated through applying it to a medical process in the context of the organization of protection of the motor disabled people of Sfax-Tunisia (ASHMS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to [8] “A sensitive process is a process, which represents the important issues which are collectively acknowledged: weakness of the process which risks not attaining its objectives, obstacles to overcome; difficult challenge to take in charge; produced goods or services which are strategic in regard to the organization’s orientations”

  2. 2.

    With respect to our notation, the informal labels on BPM4KI concepts appear in the text in the Courrier new font with First Capital Letters for the concepts and a javaLikeNotation for relations. The same conventions apply for the COOP ontology [11] presented in the paper.

References

  1. Gronau, N., Korf, R., Müller, C.: KMDL-capturing, analyzing and improving knowledge- intensive business processes. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 11, 452–472 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Heisig, P.: The GPO-WM® method for the integration of knowledge management into business processes. In: International Conference on Knowledge Management, Graz, Austria, pp. 331–337 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhaoli, Z., Zongkai, Y.: Modeling knowledge flow using Petri net. In: IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling Workshop, China, pp. 142–146 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Papavassiliou, G., Mentzas, G.: Knowledge modelling in weakly-structured business processes. J. Knowl. Manag. 7(2), 18–33 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Supulniece, I., Businska, L., Kirikova, M.: Towards extending BPMN with the knowledge dimension. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 69–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Businska, L., Supulniece, I., Kirikova, M.: On data, information, and knowledge representation in business process models. In: The 20th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2011), pp. 24–26. Springer, Edinburgh, Scotland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Netto, J.M., Franca, J.B.S., Baião, F.A., Santoro, F.M.: A notation for knowledge-intensive processes. In: IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD 2013), vol. 1, pp. 1–6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grundstein, M.: From capitalizing on company knowledge to knowledge management. In: Morey, D., Maybury, M. (eds.) Knowledge Management, Classic and Contemporary Works, Chapter 12, pp. 261–287. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saad, I., Grundstein, M., SABROUX, C.: Une méthode d’aide à l’identification des connaissances cruciales pour l’entreprise. Revue SIM, vol 14, N° 3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turki, M., Saad, I., Gargouri, F., Kassel, G.: A business process evaluation methodology for knowledge management based on multi-criteria decision making approach. In: Saad, I., Sabroux, C.R., Gargouri, F. (eds.) Information systems for knowledge management. Wiley-ISTE, Chichester (2014a). ISBN 978-1-84821-664-8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turki, M., Kassel, G., Saad, I., Gargouri, F.: COOP: a core ontology of organization’s processes for group decision making. J. Decis. Syst. 23(1), 55–68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Turki, M., Saad, I., Gargouri, F., Kassel, G.: Towards identifying sensitive processes for knowledge localization. In: International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS 2011), pp. 224–232 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. List, B., Korherr, B.: An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2006). ACM Press, France (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. OMG: unified modeling language (UML), version 2.0 (2011a). http://www.uml.org/

  16. Schlenoff, C., Gruninger, M., Tissot, F., Valois, J.: The process specification language (PSL) overview and version 1.0 specification (2000). http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/

  17. OMG: business process modeling and notation (BPMN), version 2.0 (2011b). http://www.bpmn.org/

  18. Nurcan, S.: A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifact. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEE, Hawaii, USA, p. 378, 7–10 Jan 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kassel, G., Turki, M., Saad, I., Gargouri, F.: From collective actions to actions of organizations: an ontological analysis. In: Symposium Understanding and Modelling Collective Phenomena (UMoCop), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The IDS-Scheer website (2013). http://www.ids-scheer.com/

  21. Ghrab, S., Saad, I., Kassel, G., Gargouri, F.: An ontological framework for improving the model of contribution degree of knowledge. In: International Conference on Knowledge Management, Information and Knowledge Systems (KMIKS 2015), Tunisia, pp. 45–58 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam Ben Hassen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ben Hassen, M., Turki, M., Gargouri, F. (2015). Sensitive Business Process Modeling for Knowledge Management. In: Chen, Q., Hameurlain, A., Toumani, F., Wagner, R., Decker, H. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. Globe DEXA 2015 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics