Skip to main content

Metadata

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geographic Information

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

This chapter presents an introduction to information representation of geospatial data and cartographic resources. Metadata serves as the scaffolding that allows users to find, identify, select, and obtain geographic information (GI). These organizational concepts facilitate both GI access and use by representing information objects with specific approaches. Metadata as a topic unto itself, without domain specific syntax and technical jargon, gives readers a broad view of issues that cross disciplines, sectors, and communities. This chapter includes a section of the terminology and tools of knowledge organization, as well as covering other key concepts. A review of the ever-changing schemas, profiles, and standards of GI metadata provides current best practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Library Association (1908). Catalog rules: Author and title entries. Comp. by committees of the American Library Association and the (British) Library Association. Chicago: American Library Association Publishing Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, P. G. (2003). Cataloging sheet maps: The basics. New York: Haworth Information Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, P. G., & Larsgaard, M. L. (1999). Maps and related cartographic materials: Cataloging, classification and bibliographic control. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, P. G., Moore, S. M., & Larsgaard, M. L. (2015). Resource description and access and cartographic resources. Chicago: American Library Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., Lavoie, B. F., & O’Neill, E. T. (2003). The concept of a work in WorldCat: An application of FRBR. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 27(1), 45–59. doi:10.1080/14649055.2003.10765895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B. W., & Torrence, M. (2007). Virtual reference services: Consortium vs. stand-alone. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 13(4), 117–127. doi:10.1300/J106v13n04_08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B. W., Moulaison, H. L., & Burwell, C. L. (2015). Geographic knowledge organization: Critical cartographic cataloging and place-names in the geoweb. Knowledge Organization, 42(4), 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P., Parker, T., Stone, M., (Writers), & Parker, T., (Director). (1999). Starvin’ marvin [Television series episode]. In T. Parker (Producer), South Park. New York: Comedy Central.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchel, O., & Hill, L. L. (2011). Treatment of georeferencing in knowledge organization systems: North American contributions to integrated georeferencing. NASKO, 2(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, G., & Goddard, L. (2010). The strongest link: Libraries and linked data. D-Lib magazine, 16(11), 5. doi:10.1045/november2010-byrne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1893). Sylvie and Bruno concluded. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, C. A., Ford, W. C., Phillips, P. L., & Conneck, O. G. T. (1904). Rules for a dictionary catalog. Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danko, D. M. (2012). Geospatial metadata. In W. Kresse & D. M. Danko (Eds.), Springer handbook of geographic information (pp. 191–244). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazniowsky, R. (1966). Bibliographies as tools for map acquisition and map compilation. Cartographer, 3, 138–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2015). Retrieved from http://dublincore.org.

  • Durante, K., & Hardy, D. (2015). Discovery, management, and preservation of geospatial data using hydra. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 11(2), 123–154. doi:10.1080/15420353.2015.1041630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fary, M., & Owen, K. (2013). Developing an institutional research data management plan service. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/developing-institutional-research-data-management-plan-service.

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee (2000). Content standard for digital geospatial metadata workbook. Reston, VA: USGS Retrieved fromhttps://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/documents/workbook_0501_bmk.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee (2004). NSDI future directions initiative: Towards a national geospatial strategy and implementation plan. .http://www.fgdc.gov/policyandplanning/future-directions/reports/FD_Final_Report.pdf

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2015a). Retrieved from http://www.fgdc.gov.

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2015b). Geospatial metadata tools. Retrieved from http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/geospatial-metadata-tools.

  • Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). International Federation of Library Associations. Munich, Germany: K.G. Saur Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, A. J. (2008). Setting the stage. In M. Baca & Getty Research Institute (Eds.), Introduction to metadata (pp. 1–19). Getty Research Institute: Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. (2013). Personal communication, April 4, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2001). A quantitative categorical analysis of metadata elements in image-applicable metadata schemas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11), 917–924. doi:10.1002/asi.1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, D., & Durante, K. (2014). A metadata schema for geospatial resource discovery use cases. Code4lib Journal, 25. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/9710.

  • Hitt, J. (1996, March 10). The theory of supermarkets. New York Times Magazine, pp. 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervin, K. E., Michener, W. K., & Cook, R. B. (2013). Common errors in ecological data sharing. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 2(2), 3–16. doi:10.7191/jeslib.2013.1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, C., Janowicz, K., & Bishr, M. (2009). An agenda for the next generation gazetteer: Geographic information contribution and retrieval. 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiszko, K. M., Martinez, O. D., Abrams, C., & Elbel, B. (2014). The influence of calorie labeling on food orders and consumption: A review of the literature. Journal of Community Health, 39(6), 1248–1269. doi:10.1007/s10900-014-9876-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemp, R. P. (1982). On the access to cartographic collections in GDR libraries. INSPEl, 16, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozimor, J., Habermann, T., Gordon, S. Powers, L., & Farley, J. (2016). Big Earth Data Initiative (BEDI) metadata improvement: Case studies. Earth Science Information Partners Winter Meeting 2016, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsgaard, M. L. (1998). Map Librarianship: An introduction. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae (10th ed.). Biodiversity Heritage Library OAI Repository: Citebank Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/cbarchive_53979_linnaeus1758systemanaturae1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makri, S. (2014). Serendipity is not bullshit. EuroHCIR 2014, The 4th European symposium on human-computer interaction and information retrieval, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1982). Strategic data planning method. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinolich, K. (2015). Introduction to geospatial metadata. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.ncddc.noaa.gov/pub/Metadata/Online_ISO_Training/Intro_to_Geospatial_Metadata/presentations/1-IntroductionToMetadata.pptx.

  • Medeiros, N., Bills, L., Blatchley, J., Pascale, C., & Weir, B. (2011). Managing administrative metadata. Library Resources & Technical Services, 47(1), 28–35. doi:10.5860/lrts.47n1.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, W. K., Brunt, J. W., Helly, J. J., Kirchner, T. B., & Stafford, S. G. (1997). Nongeospatial metadata for the ecological sciences. Ecological Applications, 7(1), 330–342. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0330:NMFTES]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (2008). Web cartography and the dissemination of cartographic information about coastal inundation and sea level rise. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), International perspectives on maps and the Internet (pp. 48–72). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Information Standards Organization (2004). Understanding metadata. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Computer Library Center. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/dewey.en.html.

  • Rothman, R. L., Housam, R., Weiss, H., Davis, D., Gregory, R., Gebretsadik, T., et al. (2006). Patient understanding of food labels: The role of literacy and numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(5), 391–398. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.C. (2013). Spatial wildfire occurrence data for the United States, 1992–2011. [FPA_FOD_20130422]. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. doi:10.2737/RDS-2013-0009.

  • Sinclair, S. E., Cooper, M., & Mansfield, E. D. (2014). The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(9), 1375–1388. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. L. (2005). Forest fire causes and extent on United States Forest Service lands. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 14(3), 213–222. doi:10.1071/WF04006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szostak, R. (2014). The importance of knowledge organization. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(4), 37–42. doi:10.1002/bult.2014.1720400414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2009). The organization of information. Westport, CA: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United State Geological Survey. (2015). South Florida Information Access. Retrieved from http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/.

  • Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bishop, W., Grubesic, T.H. (2016). Metadata. In: Geographic Information. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22789-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics