The Carbon Dioxide Problem and Solution

  • Roger James Kuhns
  • George H. Shaw
Chapter

Abstract

The problem of global warming and global climate change cannot be ignored in any discussion regarding long-term energy policy. And the solution, as part of a comprehensive sustainable energy plan, is putting a fee or tax on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide is a pollutant, not when naturally exhaled by animals but rather through the release of naturally sequestered carbon by human practice of burning of fossil fuels. To put this in perspective, we first look at the carbon dioxide problem, and then we look at pricing carbon as part of the overall energy policy solution. The main problem is, of course, the ever-increasing emissions from the burning of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide levels have risen to above 408 ppm in 2017 from 316 ppm in 1958 according to the Mauna Loa Observatory, which is above the estimated 275 ppm preindustrial concentrations. This has translated into global warming, which is causing climate change. As the globe warms, we experience more extreme weather and climate events. Coastal communities are some of the hardest hit as sea level rises and storm tides roar in at record heights. Food resources are being impacted by new flood and drought cycles and the exacerbation of invasive plants and insects that impact crops. The solution is complex, but begins with carbon pricing. This requires federal action to level the economic playing field. As has been seen in states such as California and regions such as the Northeast states under RGGI, we find that reducing emissions does not negatively impact GDP, which in fact it improves. This “decoupling” is important in justifying a fee or tax on carbon dioxide. Cap-and-trade mechanisms have been used on the state level, but as yet have not been applied on a national basis.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide Climate change Greenhouse gas Sea level rise Cap and trade Carbon fee/carbon tax Global warming Emissions GDP CO2e RGGI GHG Carbon pricing 

References

  1. Brookings Institute (2017) Metropolitan policy program. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/program/metropolitan-policy-program/. Accessed 20 July 2017
  2. Carbon Tax Center (2016) Pricing carbon efficiency and equitability. Carbon Tax Center. https://www.carbontax.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2017
  3. CEPAARB (2017) California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. www.arb.ca.gov/. Accessed 20 July 2017
  4. CCL (2017) Citizens’ climate lobby. www.citizensclimatelobby.org. Accessed 20 July 2017
  5. EPA (2016a) Understanding global warming potentials. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials. Accessed 5 Feb 2017
  6. EPA (2016b) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks. Accessed 14 Feb 2017
  7. IPCC (2017) Assessment report: intergovernmental panel on climate change. http://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed 4 Aug 2017
  8. McKibben B (2016) Why we need a carbon tax, and why it won’t be enough. Yale Environment 360. http://e360.yale.edu/features/why_we_need_a_carbon_tax_and_why_it_won_be_enough. Accessed 20 July 2017
  9. NOAA (2017) Global climate report – July, 2017: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201707. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
  10. RGGI (2016) Emissions reduction and increases in GDP for the nine-state northeastern U.S. region: regional greenhouse gas initiative. https://www.rggi.org/. Accessed 12 Mar 2017
  11. RGGI (2017) The RGGI CO2 Cap: Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. https://www.rggi.org/design/overview/cap. Access 15 Nov 2017
  12. Rohde R, Muller RA, Jacobsen R, Muller E, Perlmutter S, Rosenfeld A, Wurtele J, Groom D, Wickman C (2013) A new estimate of the average earth surface land temperature spanning 1753 to 2011. Geoinformatics & geostatistics: an overview 1:1. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4581.1000101. Accessed 9 May 2015
  13. Saha D, Nuro M (2016) Growth, carbon, and trump: state progress and drift on economic growth and emissions ‘decoupling’. Brooking Institute, Dec 8. https://www.brookings.edu/research/growth-carbon-and-trump-state-progress-and-drift-on-economic-growth-and-emissions-decoupling/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
  14. Saha D (2017) Decreases since 2000 in U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions compared to rising U.S. GDP. The Brookings Institute; from Devashree Saha, Brookings Metro Program, March 11, 2017 presentation to Citizens’ Climate LobbyGoogle Scholar
  15. Scripps (2017) Atmospheric CO2 data – primary Mauna Loa CO2 record (1958 – present): Scripps Institute of Oceanography. http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric_co2/. Accessed 11 Aug 2017
  16. USGCRP (2017) Climate science special report: fourth national climate assessment, vol 1. In: Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK (eds). U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 470pp. doi:https://doi.org/10.7930/J0J964J6

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger James Kuhns
    • 1
  • George H. Shaw
    • 2
  1. 1.SustainAudit, LLCMysticUSA
  2. 2.Geology DepartmentUnion CollegeSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations