Defining a Geogame Genre Using Core Concepts of Games, Play, and Geographic Information and Thinking

Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)


In 2008, the National Science Foundation (NSF) released the report “Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge”. NSF argued in this report that the heavy investment and focus on Cyberinfrastructures must be complemented by a parallel investment in Cyberlearning, “…learning that is mediated by networked computing and communications technologies.” (Borgman et al. 2008). The rationale was that information and communication technologies had reached a critical tipping point where high-end computing, cyberinfrastructures and mobile technologies were readily available for billions of users, but it was still unclear what affordances they could bring to learning in structured classroom settings and more informal learning environments.


  1. Ahlqvist O, Loffing T, Ramanathan J, Kocher A (2012) Geospatial human-environment simulation through integration of massive multiplayer online games and geographic information systems. Trans GIS 16(3):331–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlqvist, O. (2017). Location-Based Games. In International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology (pp. 1–4). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  3. Barab S, Squire K (2004) Introduction: design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barreteau O, Le Page C, Perez P (2007) Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: an introduction. Simul Gaming 38(2):185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgman CL, Abelson H, Dirks L, Johnson R, Koedinger KR, Linn MC, Lynch CA, Oblinger DG, Pea RD, Salen K, Smith MS, Szalay A (2008) Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. National Science Foundation, Virginia, p 12. Google Scholar
  6. Chan E, Vorderer P (2006) Massively multiplayer online games. In: Vorderer P, Bryant J (eds) Playing video games: motives, responses, and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, pp 77–88Google Scholar
  7. Churchill D (2007) Towards a useful classification of learning objects. Educ Technol Res Dev 55(5):479–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark D, Nelson B, Sengupta P, D’Angelo C (2009) Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: genres, examples, and evidence. In: Learning science: computer games, simulations, and education workshop sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
  9. Culatta R (2011) Taxonomies of learning technologies. Retrieved 29 Jan 2017
  10. Davidsson O, Peitz J, Björk S (2004) Game design patterns for mobile games. Project Report to Nokia Research Center, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Esri (2017a) What is a geoprocessing service?—Documentation. ArcGIS Enterprise [Software documentation]. Retrieved 20 Feb 2017
  12. Esri (2017b) World imagery. Retrieved 23 Feb 2017
  13. Fisher, P. F., & Unwin, D. J. (Eds.). (2005). Re-presenting GIS. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  14. Flint C, Shelley F (1996) Structure, agency, and context: the contributions of geography to world-systems analysis. Sociol Inq 66(4):496–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham C (2005) Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. Wiley, New York, p 624Google Scholar
  16. Holopainen J (2011) Foundations of gameplay. Doctoral dissertation Series No 2011:02. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.
  17. Järvinen A (2008) Games without frontiers: theories and methods for game studies and design. Tampere University Press, Tampere, Finland. Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, W. (2012). Core concepts of spatial information for transdisciplinary research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(12), 2267–2276.
  19. McLaughlin P, Dietz T (2008) Structure, agency and environment: toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 18(1):99–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montello DR (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, vol 716. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montello DR, Raubal M (2013) Functions and applications of spatial cognition. In: Waller D, Nadel L (eds) Handbook of spatial cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 249–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Research Council (2011) In: Honey M, Hilton M (eds) Learning science through computer games and simulations. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  23. Robinson VB, Frank AU (1987) Expert systems for geographic information systems. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 53(10):1435–1441Google Scholar
  24. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Salge F (1995) Semantic accuracy. In: Guptill SC, Morisson JL (eds) Elements of spatial data quality, vol 1. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheppard E, McMaster RB (eds) (2004) Scale and geographic inquiry. Wiley, New York. Scholar
  27. Walford, R. (1981). Geography games and simulations: learning through experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 5(2), 113–119.
  28. Wang S (2010) A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(3):535–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright DJ, Wang S (2011) The emergence of spatial cyberinfrastructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(14):5488–5491. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations