Skip to main content

Abstract

Self-home monitoring of blood pressure by patients at home has several advantages that are particularly important in clinical hypertension research. By obtaining multiple measurements in the usual environment of each individual, home blood pressure monitoring is superior to the conventional office measurements due to its higher reproducibility and the avoidance of the white coat phenomenon, masked hypertension phenomenon, the placebo effect, and observer bias. These features improve the sensitivity and precision of clinical trials of antihypertensive drug efficacy and increase the study power or decrease the sample size required. Moreover, home blood pressure monitoring allows the investigation of additional research aspects of the blood pressure profile and behavior such as the duration of antihypertensive drug effect, morning and nocturnal hypertension, blood pressure variability, treatment-induced changes in organ damage, and cardiovascular risk. Home blood pressure tele-monitoring provides a modern and reliable solution for the unbiased evaluation of treatment-induced blood pressure changes in long-term clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al.; ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Zeniodi M, Karpettas N, Ntineri A. Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stergiou GS, Baibas NM, Gantzarou AP, et al. Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15:101–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stergiou GS, Siontis KC, Ioannidis JP. Home blood pressure as a cardiovascular outcome predictor: it’s time to take this method seriously. Hypertension. 2010;55:1301–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hypertens. 2012;30:449–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bliziotis IA, Destounis A, Stergiou GS. Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1289–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Dafni MG, Stergiou GS. Patients’ preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, Marjoram J, Fitzgerald-Barron A, Mant D. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. Br Med J. 2002;325:358–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ogedegbe G, Schoenthaler A. A systematic review of the effects of home blood pressure monitoring on medication adherence. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006;8:174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Destounis A, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring alone vs. combined clinic and ambulatory measurements in following treatment-induced changes in blood pressure and organ damage. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:184–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, et al.; Hypertension Objective Treatment Based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure (HOMED-BP). Cardiovascular outcomes in the first trial of antihypertensive therapy guided by self-measured home blood pressure. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:1102–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, et al.; Treatment of Hypertension Based on Home or Office Blood Pressure (THOP) Trial Investigators. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician’s office: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:955–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boubouchairopoulou N, Karpettas N, Athanasakis K, et al. Cost estimation of hypertension management based on home blood pressure monitoring alone or combined office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:732–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nasothimiou EG, Tzamouranis D, Rarra V, Roussias LG, Stergiou GS. Diagnostic accuracy of home vs. ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in untreated and treated hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:750–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stergiou GS, Zourbaki AS, Skeva II, Mountokalakis TD. White coat effect detected using self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:820–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Argyraki CK, Roussias LG, Mountokalakis TD. White coat effect in treated versus untreated hypertensive individuals: a case-control study using ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effect of long-term antihypertensive treatment on white-coat hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;64:1388–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nasothimiou EG, Tzamouranis D, Roussias LG, Stergiou GS. Home versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of clinic resistant and true resistant hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26:696–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, et al.; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Investigators. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1393–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Altman DG. Statistics and ethics in medical research: how large a sample? Br Med J. 1980;281:1336–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mengden T, Binswanger B, Weisser B, Vetter W. An evaluation of self-measured blood pressure in a study with a calcium-channel antagonist versus a beta-blocker. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:154–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mengden T, Battig B, Vetter W. Self-measurement of blood pressure improves the accuracy and reduces the number of subjects in clinical trials. J Hypertens. 1991;9(suppl 6):S336–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Argyraki CK, Gantzarou AP, Roussias LG, Mountokalakis TD. Clinic, home and ambulatory pulse pressure: comparison and reproducibility. J Hypertens. 2002;20:1987–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva II, Baibas NM, Kalkana CB, Mountokalakis TD. Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure and pulse pressure using clinic, home and ambulatory measurements. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:729–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chatellier G, Day M, Bobrie G, Menard J. Feasibility study of N-of-1 trials with blood pressure self-monitoring in hypertension. Hypertension. 1995;25:294–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaur L, Dubroca II, Dutrey-Dupagne C, et al. Superiority of home blood pressure measurements over office measurements for testing antihypertensive drugs. Blood Press Monit. 1998;3:107–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meredith PA. How to evaluate the duration of blood pressure control: the trough:peak ratio and 24-hour monitoring. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31(suppl 2):S17–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Menard J, Chatellier G, Day M, Vaur L. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home to evaluate drug effects by the trough:peak ratio. J Hypertens Suppl. 1994;12:S21–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva II, Baibas NM, Roussias LG, Mountokalakis TD. Comparison of the smoothness index, the trough:peak ratio and the morning:evening ratio in assessing the features of the antihypertensive drug effect. J Hypertens. 2003;21:913–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zannad F, Vaur L, Dutrey-Dupagne C, et al. Assessment of drug efficacy using home self-blood pressure measurement: the SMART study. Self Measurement for the Assessment of the Response to Trandolapril. J Hum Hypertens. 1996;10:341–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nishimura T, Hashimoto J, Ohkubo T, et al. Efficacy and duration of action of the four selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockers, losartan, candesartan, valsartan and telmisartan, in patients with essential hypertension determined by home blood pressure measurements. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2005;27:477–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsui Y, Eguchi K, Shibasaki S, et al. Association between the morning-evening difference in home blood pressure and cardiac damage in untreated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2009;27:712–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen TW, Li Y, Boggia J, Thijs L, Richart T, Staessen JA. Predictive role of the night-time blood pressure. Hypertension. 2011;57:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosohata K, Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, et al. Reproducibility of nocturnal blood pressure assessed by self-measurement of blood pressure at home. Hypertens Res. 2007;30:707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stergiou GS, Nasothimiou EG, Destounis A, Poulidakis E, Evagelou I, Tzamouranis D. Assessment of the diurnal blood pressure profile and detection of non-dippers based on home or ambulatory monitoring. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:974–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoshide S, Kario K, Yano Y, et al. J-HOP Study Group. Association of morning and evening blood pressure at home with asymptomatic organ damage in the J-HOP Study. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:939–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Eguchi K, Ishikawa S, Shimada K, Kario K. Nighttime home blood pressure and the risk of hypertensive target organ damage. Hypertension. 2012;60:921–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stergiou GS, Ntineri A, Kollias A, Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Parati G. Blood pressure variability assessed by home measurements: a systematic review. Hypertens Res. 2014;37:565–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ishikura K, Obara T, Kato T, et al. J-HOME-Morning Study Group. Associations between day-by-day variability in blood pressure measured at home and antihypertensive drugs: the J-HOME-Morning study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matsui Y, O’Rourke MF, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K. Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: the Japan Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium-Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study. Hypertension. 2012;59:1132–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Asayama K, Kikuya M, Schutte R, et al. Home blood pressure variability as cardiovascular risk factor in the population of Ohasama. Hypertension. 2013;61:61–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Okada T, Matsumoto H, Nagaoka Y, Nakao T. Association of home blood pressure variability with progression of chronic kidney disease. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johansson JK, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Jula AM. Prognostic value of the variability in home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-Home Study. Hypertension. 2012;59:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoshide S, Yano Y, Shimizu M, Eguchi K, Ishikawa J, Kario K. Is home blood pressure variability itself an interventional target beyond lowering mean home blood pressure during anti-hypertensive treatment? Hypertens Res. 2012;35:862–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Karpettas N, Destounis A, Kollias A, Nasothimiou E, Moyssakis I, Stergiou GS. Prediction of treatment-induced changes in target-organ damage using changes in clinic, home and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertens Res. 2014;37:543–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95:1464–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, et al. Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients during antihypertensive therapy: primary results of HONEST, a large-scale prospective, real-world observational study. Hypertension. 2014;64:989–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Stergiou G, Parati G. Further insights into the 24-h blood pressure profile by home blood pressure monitoring: the issue of morning hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27:696–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. Prediction of stroke by home “morning” versus “evening” blood pressure values: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2006;48:737–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Stergiou GS, Nasothimiou EG, Roussias LG. Morning hypertension assessed by home or ambulatory monitoring: different aspects of the same phenomenon? J Hypertens. 2010;28:1846–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Redon J, Bilo G, Parati G. Surge Steering Committee. The effects of telmisartan alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide on morning home blood pressure control: the SURGE 2 practice-based study. Blood Press. 2013;22:377–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, et al. Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist olmesartan on morning home blood pressure in hypertension: HONEST study at 16 weeks. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27:721–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mori H, Yamamoto H, Ukai H, et al. COMPATIBLE Study Group. Comparison of effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker on morning home blood pressure and cardiorenal protection between morning administration and evening administration in hypertensive patients: the COMPATIBLE study. Hypertens Res. 2013;36:202–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hashimoto J, Chonan K, Aoki Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of evening administration of guanabenz and clonidine on morning hypertension: evaluation using home-based blood pressure measurements. J Hypertens. 2003;21:805–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mengden T, Binswanger B, Spühler T, Weisser B, Vetter W. The use of self-measured blood pressure determinations in assessing dynamics of drug compliance in a study with amlodipine once a day, morning versus evening. J Hypertens. 1993;11:1403–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Metoki H, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. J-HOME-AI Study group. The velocity of antihypertensive effect of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1478–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mashima K, Nakatsu T, Murakami T, et al. Exponential-exponential cosine fitting of blood pressure decay induced by a long-acting calcium blocker, amlodipine, using home blood pressure measurement. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2003;25:145–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Myers MG, Stergiou GS. Reporting bias: Achilles’ heel of home blood pressure monitoring. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stoddart A, Hanley J, Wild S, et al. Telemonitoring-based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension (HITS): cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002681.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nakamoto H, Nishida E, Ryuzaki M, et al. Effect of telmisartan and amlodipine on home blood pressure by monitoring newly developed telemedicine system: monitoring test by using telemedicine. Telmisartans effect on home blood pressure (TelTelbosu). Clin Exp Hypertens. 2008;30:57–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George S. Stergiou M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stergiou, G.S., Ntineri, A. (2016). Home (Self) Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Clinical Trials. In: White, W. (eds) Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics. Clinical Hypertension and Vascular Diseases. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22770-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22771-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics