Skip to main content

Abstract

Bile duct stones are concretions of bile components that originate in the gallbladder as gallstones (cholelithiasis) and that are present in the biliary tree at the time of discovery. Most gall stones, if small enough, will pass through the cystic duct and the common bile duct (CBD) into the duodenum. Choledocholithiasis refers to stones in the common bile duct. These stones may lodge in the CBD and become impacted, thereby causing a blockage of the duct. Making the diagnosis of bile duct stones begins with a basic understanding of the biliary anatomy. Diagnosis by imaging can be made with a variety of modalities, most often by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its cholangiographic adaptation (MRCP). Each modality has its relative advantages and shortcomings, and knowledge of the indirect and direct findings of choledocholithiasis, of the differential diagnosis of biliary dilatation and relative strengths of each imaging modality allows for accurate radiological diagnosis. However, one must be aware of the pitfalls of each modality to avoid misdiagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg. 1983;7:271–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortele KJ, Ros PR. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:389–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gazelle GS, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Cholangiographic segmental anatomy of the liver. RadioGraphics. 1994;14:1005–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mortelé KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL, et al. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. RadioGraphics. 2006;26(3):715–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner MA, Fulcher AS. The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. RadioGraphics. 2001;21:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bortoff GA, Chen MY, Ott DJ, Wolfman NT, Routh WD. Gallbladder stones: imaging and intervention. RadioGraphics. 2000;20:751–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeman RK. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I, editors. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1994. p. 1636–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Improved visualisation of choledocholithiasis by sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:949–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong B, Chen M. Improved sonographic visualisation of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rickes S, Treiber G, Mönkemüller K, et al. Impact of the operator’s experience on value of high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold standard. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:838–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortega D, Burns PN, Hope Simpson D, et al. Tissue harmonic imaging: is it a benefit for bile duct sonography? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(3):653–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kane RA. The biliary system. In: Goldberg BB, Kurtz AB, editors. Gastrointestinal ultrasonography. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p. 75–137.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dewbury KC, Smith CL. The misdiagnosis of common bile duct stones with ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 1983;56:625–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Moayyedi P. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA. Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neitlich JD, Topazian M, Smith RC, Gupta A, Burrell MI, Rosenfield AT. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1997;203:753–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson SW, Rho E, Soto JA. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT. Radiology. 2008;247:418–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan WC, Joe BN, Coakley FV, et al. Gallstone detection at CT in vitro: effect of peak voltage setting. Radiology. 2006;241:546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Munera F, Velez SM, Valencia J, Ramirez N. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography and MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1127–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Dusak A, et al. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature. J Dig Dis. 2008;9:162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:547–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology. 1998;207:21–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto JA, Corvera CA, Hussain HK. MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. RadioGraphics. 2009;29:1669–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karayiannakis AJ, Kakolyris S, Kouklakis G, et al. Synchronous carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and colon cancer. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011;5(2):301–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeman RK, Burrell MI. Gallbladder and bile duct imaging: a clinical radiologic approach. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1987. p. 575.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pandolfo I, Scribano E, Blandino A, et al. Tumors of the ampulla diagnosed by CT hypotonic duodenography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990;14:199–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mishra MC, Vashishtha S, Tandon R. Biliobiliary fistula: preoperative diagnosis and management implications. Surgery. 1990;108:835.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Biliobiliary fistula. A trap in the surgery of cholelithiasis. Arch Surg. 1975;110:377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Redaelli CA, Büchler MW, Schilling MK, et al. High coincidence of Mirizzi syndrome and gallbladder carcinoma. Surgery. 1997;121:58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beltran MA, Csendes A, Cruces KS. The relationship of Mirizzi syndrome and cholecystoenteric fistula: validation of a modified classification. World J Surg. 2008;32:2237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Menias CO, Surabhi VR, Prasad SR, Wang HL, Narra VR, Chintapalli KN. Mimics of cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of disease. RadioGraphics. 2008;28(4):1115–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahlawat SK, Singhania R, Al-Kawas FH. Mirizzi syndrome. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007;10(2):102–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Becker CD, Hassler H, Terrier F. Preoperative diagnosis of the Mirizzi syndrome: limitations of sonography and computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143(3):591–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi BW, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, Chung JB, Yoo HS, Lee JT. Radiologic findings of Mirizzi syndrome with emphasis on MRI. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41(1):144–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim PN, Outwater EK, Mitchell DG. Mirizzi syndrome: evaluation by MRI imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(9):2546–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunny Jaiswal M.D., M.B.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaiswal, S., Chamarthi, S. (2016). Bile Duct Stones: Making the Radiologic Diagnosis. In: Hazey, J., Conwell, D., Guy, G. (eds) Multidisciplinary Management of Common Bile Duct Stones. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22765-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22765-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22764-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22765-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics