Advertisement

Standardization, Commonality, Modularity: A Global Economic Perspective

  • Clément Chatras
  • Vincent GiardEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 459)

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of simultaneous standardization of a set of modules and of multiple sets of components that may be combined in these modules. The aim is to minimize future costs. The components and modules, whether already existing or yet to be created are not related to predetermined BOMs. The problem takes into account coupling constraints between components because not all components included in a module may be coupled (coupling restriction), although some of the restrictions can be lifted through “junction components”. Our approach is readily implemented and significantly improves decisional consistency when compared to the standardization approaches that deal with the problem in isolation as opposed to globally. It also matches the level of detail used in large organizations for forecasting purposes. This approach is illustrated with a real case study of great dimension.

Keywords

Standardization Management of diversity Optimization Product design BOM definition 

References

  1. Agard, B., Bassetto, S.: Modular design of product families for quality and cost. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(6), 1648–1667 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agard, B., Penz, B.: A simulated annealing method based on a clustering approach to determine bills of materials for a large product family. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 117(2), 389–401 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agard, B., Tollenaere, M.: Conception D’assemblages Pour La Customisation de Masse. Mécanique Ind. 3(2), 113–119 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B.: Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75, 84–93 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Baud-Lavigne, B., Agard, B., Penz, B.: Mutual impacts of product standardization and supply chain design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135(1), 50–60 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatras, C., Giard, V.: Economic variety control and modularity. In: ILS’5 Conference in Breda, Netherlands (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Dahmus, J.B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J.P., Otto, K.N.: Modular product architecture. Des. Stud. 22(5), 409–424 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dupont, L., Cormier, G.: Standardisation d’une famille ordonnée de composants dont le coût d’obtention est concave. In: MOSIM 2001, pp. 509–513 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, M., Ramdas, K., Ulrich, K.: Component sharing in the management of product variety: a study of automotive braking systems. Manage. Sci. 45(3), 297–315 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fonte,W.G.: A de-proliferation methodology for the automotive industry. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1994). http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/12064
  11. Giard, V.: Analyse Économique de La Standardisation Des Produits” Cahier GREGOR (1999)Google Scholar
  12. Giard, V.: Economical analysis of product standardization (Binder edn.). In: IFAC/IFIP/IEEE 2000. Elsevier (2001)Google Scholar
  13. Lamothe, J., Hadj-Hamou, K., Aldanondo, M.: An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(3), 1030–1047 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, M.V., Ishii, K.: Design for management and control of production and logistic variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Res. Eng. Des. 13(4), 213–235 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. Perera, H.S.C., Nagarur, N., Tabucanon, M.T.: Component part standardization: a way to reduce the life-cycle costs of products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 60–61, 109–116 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renard, C.: The standards ISO 3-1973, ISO 17-1973, SO 497-1973 and ANSI Z17.1-1973Google Scholar
  17. Rai, R., Allada, V.: Modular product family design: agent-based pareto-optimization and quality loss function-based post-optimal analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(17), 4075–4098 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rutenberg, D.P.: Design commonality to reduce multi-item inventory: optimal depth of a product line. Oper. Res. 19(2), 491–509 (1971)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T.: Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(S2), 63–76 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sered, Y., Reich, Y.: Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort. Comput. Aided Des. 38(5), 405–416 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swaminathan, J.M., Tayur, S.R.: Managing broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes. Manage. Sci. 44(12-part-2), S161–S172 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ulrich, K.T.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3), 419–440 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renault S.A.S.TechnocentreGuyancourtFrance
  2. 2.PSLParis-Dauphine UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations