Advertisement

Intelligent and Accessible Data Flow Architectures for Manufacturing System Optimization

  • Roby Lynn
  • Aoyu Chen
  • Stephanie Locks
  • Chandra Nath
  • Thomas KurfessEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 459)

Abstract

Many traditional data acquisition (DAQ) systems are expensive and inadaptable – most rely on traditional closed-source platforms – thus limiting their usefulness for machine tool diagnostics, process control and optimization. In this study, three different intelligent data flow architectures are designed and demonstrated based on consumer grade off-the-shelf hardware and software. These architectures allow data flow between both open- and closed-source platforms through multiple wired and wireless communication protocols. The proposed architectures are also evaluated for machine tool diagnostics and monitoring of multiple machine tools in manufacturing systems. To realize cloud-based manufacturing, real time sensor data are collected and displayed on remote interfaces, smart devices and a cloud/global data platform via the Internet. Findings reveal that such cyber physical system (CPS)-based manufacturing systems can effectively be used for real time process control and optimization.

Keywords

Intelligent manufacturing Machine communications Data flow Machine diagnostics Productivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Rajkumar, R., et al.: Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. In: 2010 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, L., et al.: Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 36 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karnouskos, S., et al.: A SOA-based architecture for empowering future collaborative cloud-based industrial automation. In: IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tao, F., et al.: Cloud manufacturing: a computing and service-oriented manufacturing model. J. Eng. Manuf. 225(10), 8 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, X., Xu, X.: ICMS: a cloud-based manufacturing system. In: Li, W., Mehnen, J.(eds.) Cloud Manufacturing, pp. 1–22. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milfelner, M., et al.: An overview of data acquisition system for cutting force measuring and optimization in milling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164–165, 8 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shen, W., et al.: iShopFloor: an internet-enabled agent-based intelligent shop floor. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 35(3), 11 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, L.: Machine availability monitoring and machining process planning towards cloud manufacturing. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 6(4), 11 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, N., et al.: A wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, p. 12 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, Y., et al.: Adaptive prognostics for rolling element bearing condition. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 13(1), 103–113 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Billington, S.: Sensor and machine condition effects in roller bearing diagnostics (Masters Thesis) (1997). http://hdl.handle.net/1853/17796

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roby Lynn
    • 1
  • Aoyu Chen
    • 1
  • Stephanie Locks
    • 1
  • Chandra Nath
    • 1
  • Thomas Kurfess
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations