Advertisement

Numeric Methodology for Determining the Volumetric Consumption of Hydrated Ethanol in Flex-Fuel Vehicles

  • Marcelo K. ShibuyaEmail author
  • Irenilza A. de Näas
  • Mario Mollo Neto
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 459)

Abstract

The beginning of the manufacturing of the flex fuel vehicles in 2003, gave a new dynamic to fuel demand in Brazil. As the flex-fuel vehicles can be supplied with gasoline, hydrated ethanol or the mixture of the both in any proportion, the decision on which fuel to use occurs at the moment of supply, according to the most advantageous price and the consumer’s preference. Considering this scenario, the objective of the present study was to obtain a calculation method to determine the fuel volume used by the flex-fuel vehicle fleet. For this purpose, the fuel conversion in energy units of oil barrels was used. The fuel demand by type of vehicle was obtained through the proportion of the number of vehicles and the distance traveled in the period. The results indicate that there was a behavioral change on fuel consumption by the users of the flex fuel fleet.

Keywords

Ethanol Flex-fuel vehicles Fuel demand 

References

  1. 1.
    ANFAVEA – Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores, Anuário da Indústria Automobilística Brasileira (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bake, J.D.V.D.W., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Poot, T., Walter, A.: Explaining the experience curve: cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane. Biomass Bioenergy 33, 644–658 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nogueira, L.A.H., Capaz, R.S.: Biofuels in Brazil: evolution, achievements and perspectives on food security. Glob. Food Secur. 2, 117–125 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ANP - Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Anuário Estatístico 2014. http://www.anp.gov.br/. Accessed Nov 2014
  5. 5.
    Martinez, S.H., Eijck, J.V., Cunha, M.P., Guilhoto, J.J.M., Walter, A., Faaij, A.: Analysis of socio-economic impacts of sustainable sugarcane ethanol production by means of inter-organizational input-output analysis demonstrate of North-East of Brazil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 28, 290–316 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du, X., Carriquiry, M.A.: Flex-fuel vehicle adoption and dynamics of ethanol prices: lessons from Brazil. Energy Policy (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.008i Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EPE – Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Avaliação do Comportamento dos Usuários de Veículos Flex-Fuel no Consumo de Combustíveis no Brasil – Brasília (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente), Inventário Nacional de Emissões Atmosféricas por Veículos Automotores Rodoviários, Brasília/Brasil (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Losekann, L., Vilela, T., Castro, G.R., Difusão de Automóveis Flexíveis no Brasil: Sensibilidade ao Preço e Impactos na Emissão de CO2. Instituto Brasileiro do Petróleo (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freitas, L.C., Kaneko, S.: Ethanol demand under flex-fuel technology regime in Brasil. Energy Econ. 33, 1146–1154 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    BNDES. Bioetanol de cana-de-açúcar: energia para o desenvolvimento sustentável - Rio de Janeiro (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hira, A.: Sugar rush: prospects for a global ethanol market. Energy Police 39, 6925–6935 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crago, C.L., Khanna, M., Barton, J., Giuliani, E., Amaral, W.: Competitiveness of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol compared to US corn ethanol. Energy Policy 38, 7404–7415 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santos, G.F.: Fuel demand in Brazil in a dynamic panel data approach. Energy Econ. 36, 229–240 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stattman, S.L., Hospes, O., Mol, A.P.J.: Governing biofuels in Brazil: a comparison of ethanol and biodiesel policy. Energy Policy 61, 22–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mollo Neto, M., Vendrametto, O., Walker, R.A.: Is the development of Brazilian biofuel network sustainable? In: International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS 2010). Springer, Vienna (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldemberg, J., Coelho, S.T., Lucon, O., Guardabassi, P.: Brazilian sugarcane ethanol: lessons learned. Energy Police 39, 6925–6935 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    EPE – Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Conversor de Unidades. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/. Accessed Nov 2014
  19. 19.
    Milanez, A.Y., Nyko D., Garcia, J.L.F., Reis, B.L.S.F.S.: O déficit de produção de etanol no Brasil entre 2012 e 2015: determinantes, consequências e sugestões de política. BNDES. Rio de Janeiro (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    UNICA – União da Indústria da Cana de Açúcar; Relatório Final da Safra 2013-2014. http://www.unicadata.com.br/listagem.php?idMn=88. Accessed 12 Feb 2015

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo K. Shibuya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Irenilza A. de Näas
    • 1
  • Mario Mollo Neto
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Production EngineeringPaulista University-UNIPSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.UNESP - Campus TupãTupãBrazil

Personalised recommendations