Production Planning in Intra-organizational Network – A Study Under the Point of View of Annotative Paraconsistent Logic

  • Fabio PapalardoEmail author
  • Fabio Romeu de Carvalho
  • Jose B. Sacomano
  • Jayme Aranha Machado
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 459)


Competitiveness among enterprises, acting within global sustainability, has resorted to several types of administration in order to keep companies in the vanguard of the market. One of the most efficient types of administration is effective Planning, in such a way as to perform a task at the minimum time required and the lowest possible cost. Planning has become ever so complex, due to the innumerable demands from technology and market. A relevant aspect of Planning is that the sectors that influence it, whether productive or not, compound a chain of influences that will determine either success or failure of such Planning. One manner to tackle a network matrix analysis is by Para-consistent Logic, a mathematical model that does not follow Classic Logic. It was then possible to verify the efficacy of this model of Planning analysis, as a method to be used and studied and subsequently adopted and used.


Planning Networks of Companies Paraconsistent logic 


  1. 1.
    Ernst, N.A., Borgida, A., Juretac, I.J., Mylopoulos, J.: Agile requirements engineering via paraconsist reasoning. Journal homepage: (2014)
  2. 2.
    Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, I., Matsushima, K.: Multiscale analysis of interfirm networks in regional clusters. Technovation 30, 168–180 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vollmann, T.E., Berry, W.L., Whybark, D.C., Jacobs, F.R.: Sistemas de planejamento e controle da produção. Bookman, Porto Alegre (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asla, M.B., Khalilzadeh, A., Youshanloue, H.R., Mood, M.M.: Identifying and ranking the effective factors on selecting enterprise resource planning (ERP) system using the combined Delphi and Shannon Entropy approach. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 41, 513–520 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mizruchi, M.S.: Análise de redes sociais: avanços recentes e controvérsias atuais. Revista de Administração de Empresas 46(3), 10–15 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rózewski, P., Jankowski, J., Bródka, P., Michalski, R.: Knowledge workers’ collaborative learning behavior modeling in an organizational social network. Journal homepage: (2015)
  7. 7.
    Dong, J.Q., Yang, C.-H.: Information technology and organizational learning in knowledge alliances and networks: evidence from U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Journal home page: (2015)
  8. 8.
    de Carvalho, F.R.: Tomadas de Decisão com Ferramentas da Lógica Paraconsistente Anotada. Editora Blucher, São Paulo (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Papalardo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fabio Romeu de Carvalho
    • 1
  • Jose B. Sacomano
    • 1
  • Jayme Aranha Machado
    • 1
  1. 1.Post-Graduate Program in Production EngineeringPaulista University-UNIPSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations