Advertisement

Co-operative Production Planning: Dynamic Documents in Manufacturing

  • Steinar KristoffersenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 459)

Abstract

This case study describes the manufacturing of advanced, high-value maritime vessel equipment as an opportunistic, dynamic, knowledge-needy and collaborative process, in which planning and construction is closely integrated, rather than as a repeatable physical assembly that takes place in phases, for each of which planning is pre-hoc and pre-emptive. We assert that this is one reason that the anachronistic perspective of “documents as documentation”, contributes to actors’ conflicting views of their project. This paper examines these difficulties, offers a theoretical examination and design implications for next generation industries to consider.

Keywords

Design and manufacturing in a collaborative setting Engineer-to-order (ETO) Lean documentation Quality IT support for industry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support of VRI Møre & Norway is appreciatively acknowledged, as well as the willingness of ACC to explore this set of ideas within a project that first and foremost aimed at reducing the cost of building cranes. We would especially like to thank managers, engineers and administrators in ACC who spent extra time in meetings and dialog with the author and other researches.

References

  1. 1.
    Ekstedt, E.: A new division of labour: the “projectification” of working and industrial life. In: Moreau, M.-A., Negrelli, S., Pochet, P. (eds.) Building Anticipation of Restructuring in Europe, pp. 31–54. Peter Lang, Bruxelles (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    King, J.P., Jewett, W.S.: Robustness Development and Reliability Growth: Value Adding Strategies for New Products and Processes. Pearson Education, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rocha, H.M., de Souza, C.N.A., dos Santos Filho, D.F.: Mass customization enablement through lean design & set-based concurrent engineering application. J. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 7(2), 124–139Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen, W., et al.: Applications of agent-based systems in intelligent manufacturing: an updated review. Adv. Eng. Inform. 20(4), 415–431 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choy, K.L., Lee, W., Lo, V.: Design of an intelligent supplier relationship management system: a hybrid case based neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 24(2), 225–237 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Froud, J., et al.: Financialization across the Pacific: manufacturing cost ratios, supply chains and power. Crit. Perspect. Acc. 25(1), 46–57 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: value creation in a knowledge society. Knowl. Enterp. IFIP 207, 26–40 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabenstetter, D.H., Usher, J.M.: Developing due dates in an engineer-to-order engineering environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(21), 6349–6361 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hummels, D.: Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. J. Econ. Perspect. 131–154 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venkata, S., et al.: What future distribution engineers need to learn. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(1), 17–23 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brettel, M., et al.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Sci. Eng. 8(1), 37–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dwivedi, Y.K., et al.: IS/IT project failures: a review of the extant literature for deriving a taxonomy of failure factors. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., Henriksen, H.Z., Wastell, D., De’, R. (eds.) Grand Successes and Failures in IT. Public and Private Sectors, pp. 73–88. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christensen, L.R., Bjorn, P.: Documentscape: intertextuality, sequentiality, & autonomy at work. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Massey, C., Lennig, T., Whittaker, S.: Cloudy forecast: an exploration of the factors underlying shared repository use. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, D., et al.: Creative conflict resolution in realtime collaborative editing systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iivari, J.: Object-orientation as structural, functional and behavioural modelling: a comparison of six methods for object-oriented analysis. Inf. Softw. Technol. 37(3), 155–163 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Twidale, M.B., et al.: Quick and dirty: lightweight methods for heavyweight research. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crabtree, A., et al.: Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(7), 666–682 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Toward high-performance organizations: a strategic role for groupware. In: Proceedings of the GroupWare (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Møreforsking Molde AS and Molde University CollegeMoldeNorway

Personalised recommendations