Advertisement

An Open Data Approach for Clinical Appropriateness

  • Mario A. Bochicchio
  • Lucia VairaEmail author
  • Marco Zappatore
  • Giambattista Lobreglio
  • Marilena Greco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9267)

Abstract

In recent years there have been partially unexpected qualitative and quantitative increase in clinical exams demand. Although on the one hand this is the positive result of better health awareness, mostly in terms of prevention, on the other hand it is the direct and logical consequence of the defensive behaviour, which arises from the potential occurrence of legal controversies and of the clinician’s unawareness about the cost of examinations. To reduce the occurrence of unnecessary clinical tests we propose an approach based on Open Data and Open Software that can be adapted to existing medical information systems to enforce a suitable set of “appropriateness rules”. The idea is to directly intervene at the moment of the request emission, in order to avoid unnecessary demands, which have no urgent and valid motivations and/or no value for patients.

Keywords

Open data Clinical appropriateness Open software Rule engine 

References

  1. 1.
    Fryer, A.A., Smellie, W.S.: Managing demand for laboratory tests: a laboratory toolkit. J. Clin. Pathol. 66, 62–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terry, M.: Lab Industry Strategic Outlook Market Trends and Analysis 2007. Washington G-2 Reports (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniels, M., Schroeder, S.A.: Variation among physicians in the use of laboratory tests: relation to clinical productivity and outcomes. Med. Care 15, 482–487 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valenstein, P., Leiken, A., et al.: Tests ordering by multiple physicians increases unnecessary laboratory examinations. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 112, 238–241 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bareford, D., Hayling, A.: Innappropriate use of laboratory services: long term combined approach to modify request patterns. BMJ 301, 1305–1307 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Walraven, C., Naylor, C.D.: Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. JAMA 280, 550–558 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Batalden, P.B., Davidoff, F.: What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare? Qual. Saf. Health Care 16(1), 2–3 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodriguez-Espinosa, J.: Clinical laboratory: use and misuse, management models and health expenditure. Med. Clin. (Barc) 125, 622–625 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larsson, A., Palmer, M., Hulte`n, G., Tryding, N.: Large differences in laboratory utilisation between hospitals in Sweden. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 38, 383–389 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pleban, M., Mussap, M.: ICT, automazione e appropriatezza: le logiche organizzative e le logiche diagnostiche. Riv Med Lab-JLM 5(2), 92–101 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonaldi, A., Vernero, S.: Italy’s Slow Medicine: a new paradigm in medicine. Recenti Prog. Med. 106(2), 85–91 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prinsloo, E.A.M., Dimpe, M.W., et al.: Doctors’ use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. S. Afr. J. Epidemiol. Infect. 25(3), 16–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fryer, A.A., Hanna, F.W.: Managing demand for pathology tests: financial imperative of duty of care? Ann. Clin. Biochem. 46, 435–437 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catrou, P.G.: Is that lab test necessary? Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 126, 335–336 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahn, C.E.: An Internet-based ontology editor for medical appropriateness criteria. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 56, 31–36 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verhulst, S., Noveck, B.S. et al.: The Open Data Era in health and social care: a blueprint for the National Health Service (NHS England) to develop a research and learning programme for the open data in health and social care, May 2014Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta, A., Forgy, C., et al.: High-speed implementations of rule-based systems. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 7(2), 119–146 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario A. Bochicchio
    • 1
  • Lucia Vaira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marco Zappatore
    • 1
  • Giambattista Lobreglio
    • 2
  • Marilena Greco
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering for InnovationUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PathologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations