Skip to main content

Two-Dimensional Knowledge Model for Learning Control and Competence Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (LTEC 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 533))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper presents two-dimensional model for knowledge representation with volume as one variable and ability as another one. This makes possible describing current state of learner’s abilities and integration for higher level parameters e.g. grading related to course or other entities. Both values are related to atomized knowledge elements (competences) with volume interpreted as credit units and ability levels are formed during learning with application of forgetting. This model makes possible characterization (grading) of knowledge based on real abilities independently of predeclared courses and for ‘drop-outs’. So, on that bases one can obtain grade for some course if proper knowledge has been obtained in different courses and schools even when courses had not passed. Also this model helps to build connections between courses as using courses in the role of prerequisites becomes less usable. Not wasting knowledge obtained in MOOCs is another example with high drop-out levels where classical passed-failed model does not work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R.H., Chang, V., Morales, M.: Attrition in MOOC: lessons learned from drop-out students. In: Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, Y.-H., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2014. CCIS, vol. 446, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan, K.: Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15(1), 133–160 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ILM. https://www.i-l-m.com/Learning-and-Development/Our-approach/Units-credit-values. Accessed 27 February 2015

  4. Rozeboom, H.: Competence based learning. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca 63(1), 365–367 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sánchez, A.V., Ruiz, M.P.: Competence Based Learning - A Proposal for the Assessment of Generic Competences, p. 29. University of Deusto, Bilbao (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jaanus, M.: The Interactive Learning Environment for Mobile Laboratories, p. 59. Tallinn University of Technology Press, Tallinn (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.ehow.com/info_8053775_competencies.html. Accessed 8 April 2015

  8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competence_(human_resources). Accessed 8 April 2015

  9. Kukk, V.: Student’s behavior in free learning environment and formal education System. In: Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, Y.-H., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2014. CCIS, vol. 446, pp. 187–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, F.B.: The Basics of item Response Theory: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. University of Maryland, College Park (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muzzylane. http://muzzylane.com/files/Feedback_Loops_and_Learning.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2015

  12. Al-A’Ali, M.: IRT-Item response theory assessment for an adaptive teaching assessment system. In: 10th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics, pp. 518–522, Dallas, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Umbleja, K.: Students’ grading control and visualisation in competence-based learning approach. In: IEEE Educon 2015, pp. 294–303 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wozniak, P.A.: Two components of long-term memory. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 55, 301–305 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. IRT. http://www.creative-wisdom.com/computer/sas/IRT.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2015

  16. Wixted, J.T., Carpenter, S.K.: The Wickelgren power law and the Ebbinghaus savings function. Psychol. Sci. 18(2), 133–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kukk, V., Umbleja, K.: Analysis of forgetting in a learning environment. In: 13th Biennial Baltic Electronics Conference, pp. 335–338, Tallinn, Estonia, 3–5 October 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vello Kukk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kukk, V., Umbleja, K., Jaanus, M. (2015). Two-Dimensional Knowledge Model for Learning Control and Competence Mapping. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Welzer, T. (eds) Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. LTEC 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 533. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22629-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22629-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22628-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22629-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics