Divergences in Perturbation Theory

  • Antal Jakovác
  • András Patkós
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 912)


Loop corrections to the tree level results turn out to be divergent, or very large in certain cases. The physical reason for these divergences is that the system interacts with an infinite (or very large) number of fluctuating degrees of freedom. The problematic divergences emerge in the calculation of per se finite quantities. This kind of divergence signals that the perturbation theory is organized in an inappropriate way. This chapter explains the large flexibility of the perturbative renormalization and the concept of the line of constant physics, which represent the guiding “compass” for extracting unique physical predictions from different models in the theory space. The principles are explained through the detailed example of the self-interacting one-component scalar field theory.


Renormalized Perturbation Theory Counterterms Bare Parameters Unperturbed Lagrangian Perturbative Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    I. Montvay, G. Münster, Quantum Fields on a Lattice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.C. Collins, Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.G. Callan, Phys. Rev. D 12, 1541 (1970)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Symanzik, Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 27 (1970)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Gies, C. Gneiting, R. Sondenheimer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 045012 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.P. Kadanoff, Physics (N.Y.) 2, 263 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 583 (1983)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 352, 90 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.R. Morris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 2411 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Nagy, Ann. Phys. 350, 310 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rep. 363, 223 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B 231, 269 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antal Jakovác
    • 1
  • András Patkós
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsRoland Eötvös UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations