Skip to main content

Favorable Subsets Among Cancers of Unknown Primary

  • Chapter

Abstract

Although cancers of unknown primary origin (CUP) are a heterogeneous group of cancers characterized by absence of an identifiable primary site, there are several distinctive favorable clinicopathological CUP subsets that warrant a tailored management. The favorable designation was based on a presentation that overwhelmingly suggested a specific treatable primary. When originally defined, the designation was based on anatomic and morphological considerations on pathology. In the modern era, these favorable subsets still exist although the anatomic diagnosis is now supported by immunohistochemistry or molecular profiling confirmation. The “favorable subsets” and their putative primary include patients with solitary metastatic disease, osteoblastic metastases with elevated prostate-specific antigen in men (prostate), adenocarcinoma with isolated axillary lymph node involvement in women (breast cancer), serous papillary carcinoma of the peritoneal cavity in women (ovarian cancer), poorly differentiated carcinoma with midline distribution, neuroendocrine carcinomas, squamous cell carcinoma involving cervical lymph nodes, and adenocarcinoma with immunohistochemical profile consistent with a gastrointestinal primary (colon, small bowel, appendix cancers). While not all patients with these subsets have favorable prognosis, recognizing these subsets is vital for making therapeutic decisions. Survival of these CUP patients is favorable compared to survival of disseminated CUP patients that do not fit into these specific subsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Varadhachary GR, Raber MN. Cancer of unknown primary site. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(8):757–65. PubMed PMID: 25140961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G. Cancer of unknown primary site. Lancet. 2012;379(9824):1428–35. PubMed PMID: 22414598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fizazi K, Greco FA, Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2011;22(Suppl 6):vi64–8. PubMed PMID: 21908507.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Culine S, Lortholary A, Voigt JJ, Bugat R, Theodore C, Priou F, et al. Cisplatin in combination with either gemcitabine or irinotecan in carcinomas of unknown primary site: results of a randomized phase II study--trial for the French Study Group on Carcinomas of Unknown Primary (GEFCAPI 01). J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;21(18):3479–82. PubMed PMID: 12972523.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Golfinopoulos V, Pentheroudakis G, Salanti G, Nearchou AD, Ioannidis JP, Pavlidis N. Comparative survival with diverse chemotherapy regimens for cancer of unknown primary site: multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35(7):570–3. PubMed PMID: 19539430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hainsworth JD, Daugaard G, Lesimple T, Hubner G, Greco FA, Stahl MJ, et al. Paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without belinostat as empiric first-line treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a randomized, phase 2 trial. Cancer. 2015;121(10):1654–61. PubMed PMID: 25611313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Thompson DS, Murphy PB, Lane CM, Waterhouse DM, et al. Paclitaxel/carboplatin plus bevacizumab/erlotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Oncologist. 2009;14(12):1189–97. PubMed PMID: 19965914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlidis N, Briasoulis E, Hainsworth J, Greco FA. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(14):1990–2005. PubMed PMID: 12957453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NCCN. National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) 2015. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.

  10. Briasoulis E, Tolis C, Bergh J, Pavlidis N, Force EGT. ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of cancers of unknown primary site (CUP). Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2005;16 Suppl 1:i75–6. PubMed PMID: 15888766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Culine S. Prognostic factors in unknown primary cancer. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(1):60–4. PubMed PMID: 19179189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH, Greco FA. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in the treatment of poorly differentiated carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site: results of a 12-year experience. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1992;10(6):912–22. PubMed PMID: 1375284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy A, Massard C, Gross-Goupil M, Fizazi K. Carcinomas of an unknown primary site: a curable disease? Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2008;19(9):1657–8. PubMed PMID: 18647966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rades D, Kuhnel G, Wildfang I, Borner AR, Schmoll HJ, Knapp W. Localised disease in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): the value of positron emission tomography (PET) for individual therapeutic management. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2001;12(11):1605–9. PubMed PMID: 11822762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollowell KL, Agle SC, Zervos EE, Fitzgerald TL. Cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinoma: defining epidemiology, outcomes, and optimal therapy for a rare neoplasm. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105(4):415–9. PubMed PMID: 21913192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mentrikoski MJ, Wick MR. Immunohistochemical distinction of primary sweat gland carcinoma and metastatic breast carcinoma: can it always be accomplished reliably? Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143(3):430–6. PubMed PMID: 25696802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rollins-Raval M, Chivukula M, Tseng GC, Jukic D, Dabbs DJ. An immunohistochemical panel to differentiate metastatic breast carcinoma to skin from primary sweat gland carcinomas with a review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(8):975–83. PubMed PMID: 21809988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Lee CH, Kim BH, Kim WB, Yeom SK, Kim KA, et al. Typical and atypical imaging findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(6):704–9. PubMed PMID: 23192208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chybowski FM, Keller JJ, Bergstralh EJ, Oesterling JE. Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters. J Urol. 1991;145(2):313–8. PubMed PMID: 1703240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Inagaki J, Sugiura H, Ito S, Iwata H. Determining the site of the primary cancer in patients with skeletal metastasis of unknown origin: a retrospective study. Cancer. 1999;86(3):533–7. PubMed PMID: 10430264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Humphrey PA, Montironi R; Members of the ISUP Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group.. Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the prostate: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(8):e6–19. PubMed PMID: 25029122

    Google Scholar 

  22. Queisser A, Hagedorn SA, Braun M, Vogel W, Duensing S, Perner S. Comparison of different prostatic markers in lymph node and distant metastases of prostate cancer. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2015;28(1):138–45. PubMed PMID: 24925052.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horwich A, Hugosson J, de Reijke T, Wiegel T, Fizazi K, Kataja V, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Consensus Conference Guidelines 2012. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2013;24(5):1141–62. PubMed PMID: 23303340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwamura H, Hatakeyama S, Tanaka Y, Tanaka T, Tokui N, Yamamoto H, et al. A case of metastatic cancer with markedly elevated PSA level that was not detected by repeat prostate biopsy. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:64. PubMed PMID: 24476098. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3909476.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Foroudi F, Tiver KW. Occult breast carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(1):143–7. PubMed PMID: 10758316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh R, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Bentley R, DeLong DM. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(1):33–8. PubMed PMID: 8976915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker GV, Smith GL, Perkins GH, Oh JL, Woodward W, Yu TK, et al. Population-based analysis of occult primary breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis. Cancer. 2010;116(17):4000–6. PubMed PMID: 20564117. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4329781.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sangoi AR, Shrestha B, Yang G, Mego O, Beck AH. The Novel Marker GATA3 is Significantly More Sensitive Than Traditional Markers Mammaglobin and GCDFP15 for Identifying Breast Cancer in Surgical and Cytology Specimens of Metastatic and Matched Primary Tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol AIMM Off Publ Soc Appl Immunohistochem. 2015;21. PubMed PMID: 25906123.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Braxton DR, Cohen C, Siddiqui MT. Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43(4):271–7. PubMed PMID: 25088841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huo L, Gong Y, Guo M, Gilcrease MZ, Wu Y, Zhang H, et al. GATA-binding protein 3 enhances the utility of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin A in triple-negative breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. Histopathology. 2015;67(2):245–54. PubMed PMID: 25564996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Buchanan CL, Morris EA, Dorn PL, Borgen PI, Van Zee KJ. Utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with occult primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(12):1045–53. PubMed PMID: 16244803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olson Jr JA, Morris EA, Van Zee KJ, Linehan DC, Borgen PI. Magnetic resonance imaging facilitates breast conservation for occult breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(6):411–5. PubMed PMID: 10894136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rueth NM, Black DM, Limmer AR, Gabriel E, Huo L, Fornage BD, et al. Breast conservation in the setting of contemporary multimodality treatment provides excellent outcomes for patients with occult primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(1):90–5. PubMed PMID: 25249256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ellerbroek N, Holmes F, Singletary E, Evans H, Oswald M, McNeese M. Treatment of patients with isolated axillary nodal metastases from an occult primary carcinoma consistent with breast origin. Cancer. 1990;66(7):1461–7. PubMed PMID: 2207996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. He M, Tang LC, Yu KD, Cao AY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM, et al. Treatment outcomes and unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with occult breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol. 2012;38(11):1022–8. PubMed PMID: 22959166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Thompson A, Zackrisson S, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi7–23. PubMed PMID: 23970019.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Karlan BY, Baldwin RL, Lopez-Luevanos E, Raffel LJ, Barbuto D, Narod S, et al. Peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma, a phenotypic variant of familial ovarian cancer: implications for ovarian cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):917–28. PubMed PMID: 10203660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Moller P, Rosen B, et al. Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. JAMA. 2006;296(2):185–92. PubMed PMID: 16835424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Killackey MA, Davis AR. Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneal surface: matched-case comparison with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51(2):171–4. PubMed PMID: 8276289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Strnad CM, Grosh WW, Baxter J, Burnett LS, Jones 3rd HW, Greco FA, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site in women. A distinctive subset of adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111(3):213–7. PubMed PMID: 2502058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ben-Baruch G, Sivan E, Moran O, Rizel S, Menczer J, Seidman DS. Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a study of 25 cases and comparison with stage III-IV ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60(3):393–6. PubMed PMID: 8774644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Attanoos RL, Webb R, Dojcinov SD, Gibbs AR. Value of mesothelial and epithelial antibodies in distinguishing diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma in females from serous papillary carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Histopathology. 2002;40(3):237–44. PubMed PMID: 11895489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ozcan A, Shen SS, Hamilton C, Anjana K, Coffey D, Krishnan B, et al. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic tissues, primary tumors, and metastatic tumors: a comprehensive immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2011;24(6):751–64. PubMed PMID: 21317881.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Matsuo K, Sheridan TB, Mabuchi S, Yoshino K, Hasegawa K, Studeman KD, et al. Estrogen receptor expression and increased risk of lymphovascular space invasion in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(3):473–9. PubMed PMID: 24674832. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4170217.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Q, Lin JX, Shi QL, Wu B, Ma HH, Sun GQ. Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a clinical and pathological study. Pathol Oncol Res POR. 2011;17(3):713–9. PubMed PMID: 21647781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ordonez NG. The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas: a comparative study. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2006;19(1):34–48. PubMed PMID: 16056246.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Piver MS, Eltabbakh GH, Hempling RE, Recio FO, Blumenson LE. Two sequential studies for primary peritoneal carcinoma: induction with weekly cisplatin followed by either cisplatin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel-cisplatin. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67(2):141–6. PubMed PMID: 9367697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ledermann JA, Raja FA, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N, Sessa C, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi24–32. PubMed PMID: 24078660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pentheroudakis G, Stoyianni A, Pavlidis N. Cancer of unknown primary patients with midline nodal distribution: midway between poor and favourable prognosis? Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37(2):120–6. PubMed PMID: 20673701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Poorly differentiated carcinoma and germ cell tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1991;5(6):1223–31. PubMed PMID: 1663941.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cheng L. Establishing a germ cell origin for metastatic tumors using OCT4 immunohistochemistry. Cancer. 2004;101(9):2006–10. PubMed PMID: 15386301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Michels S, Swanson PE, Frizzera G, Wick MR. Immunostaining for leukocyte common antigen using an amplified avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method and paraffin sections. A study of 735 hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic human neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987;111(11):1035–9. PubMed PMID: 2444189.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Motzer RJ, Rodriguez E, Reuter VE, Bosl GJ, Mazumdar M, Chaganti RS. Molecular and cytogenetic studies in the diagnosis of patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas of unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1995;13(1):274–82. PubMed PMID: 7799031.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sakai N, Yamada T, Asao T, Murayama T. Sonographically-detected impalpable testicular cancer with retroperitoneal bulky metastases: a case report. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 1997;4(5):533–4. PubMed PMID: 9354963.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lu X, Hu C, Ji Q, Shen C, Feng Y. Squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site: the impact of radiotherapy. Tumori. 2009;95(2):185–90. PubMed PMID: 19579864.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Grau C, Johansen LV, Jakobsen J, Geertsen P, Andersen E, Jensen BB. Cervical lymph node metastases from unknown primary tumours. Results from a national survey by the Danish Society for Head and Neck Oncology. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2000;55(2):121–9. PubMed PMID: 10799723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Compton AM, Moore-Medlin T, Herman-Ferdinandez L, Clark C, Caldito GC, Wang XI, et al. Human papillomavirus in metastatic lymph nodes from unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(1):51–7. PubMed PMID: 21493313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Johansen J, Buus S, Loft A, Keiding S, Overgaard M, Hansen HS, et al. Prospective study of 18FDG-PET in the detection and management of patients with lymph node metastases to the neck from an unknown primary tumor. Results from the DAHANCA-13 study. Head Neck. 2008;30(4):471–8. PubMed PMID: 18023031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Keller F, Psychogios G, Linke R, Lell M, Kuwert T, Iro H, et al. Carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck: comparison between positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT. Head Neck. 2011;33(11):1569–75. PubMed PMID: 21990221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Waltonen JD, Ozer E, Schuller DE, Agrawal A. Tonsillectomy vs. deep tonsil biopsies in detecting occult tonsil tumors. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(1):102–6. PubMed PMID: 19117304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gregoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, Felip E, Group E-E-EGW. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v184–6. PubMed PMID: 20555077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Reddy SP, Marks JE. Metastatic carcinoma in the cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site: results of bilateral neck plus mucosal irradiation vs. ipsilateral neck irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37(4):797–802. PubMed PMID: 9128954.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Klop WM, Balm AJ, Keus RB, Hilgers FJ, Tan IB. [Diagnosis and treatment of 39 patients with cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin, referred to Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1979-98]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2000;144(28):1355–60. PubMed PMID: 10923158. Diagnostiek en behandeling van 39 patienten met halskliermetastasen van plaveiselcelcarcinoom van onbekende primaire origine, verwezen naar het Nederlands Kanker Instituut/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, 1979/’98.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dennis JL, Hvidsten TR, Wit EC, Komorowski J, Bell AK, Downie I, et al. Markers of adenocarcinoma characteristic of the site of origin: development of a diagnostic algorithm. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2005;11(10):3766–72. PubMed PMID: 15897574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown RW, Campagna LB, Dunn JK, Cagle PT. Immunohistochemical identification of tumor markers in metastatic adenocarcinoma. A diagnostic adjunct in the determination of primary site. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107(1):12–9. PubMed PMID: 8980361.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Varadhachary GR, Raber MN, Matamoros A, Abbruzzese JL. Carcinoma of unknown primary with a colon-cancer profile-changing paradigm and emerging definitions. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(6):596–9. PubMed PMID: 18510991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2000;13(9):962–72. PubMed PMID: 11007036.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Blumenfeld W, Turi GK, Harrison G, Latuszynski D, Zhang C. Utility of cytokeratin 7 and 20 subset analysis as an aid in the identification of primary site of origin of malignancy in cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20(2):63–6. PubMed PMID: 9951598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Bayrak R, Haltas H, Yenidunya S. The value of CDX2 and cytokeratins 7 and 20 expression in differentiating colorectal adenocarcinomas from extraintestinal gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: cytokeratin 7-/20+ phenotype is more specific than CDX2 antibody. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:9. PubMed PMID: 22268990. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3331835.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Barbareschi M, Murer B, Colby TV, Chilosi M, Macri E, Loda M, et al. CDX-2 homeobox gene expression is a reliable marker of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases to the lungs. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(2):141–9. PubMed PMID: 12548159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Varadhachary GR, Karanth S, Qiao W, Carlson HR, Raber MN, Hainsworth JD, et al. Carcinoma of unknown primary with gastrointestinal profile: immunohistochemistry and survival data for this favorable subset. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(3):479–84. PubMed PMID: 23813044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hainsworth JD, Schnabel CA, Erlander MG, Haines 3rd DW, Greco FA. A retrospective study of treatment outcomes in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site and a colorectal cancer molecular profile. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2012;11(2):112–8. PubMed PMID: 22000811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kim JH, Rhee YY, Bae JM, Cho NY, Kang GH. Loss of CDX2/CK20 expression is associated with poorly differentiated carcinoma, the CpG island methylator phenotype, and adverse prognosis in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(10):1532–41. PubMed PMID: 24025523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Spigel DR, Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary site. Semin Oncol. 2009;36(1):52–9. PubMed PMID: 19179188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Anlauf M, Gerlach P, Schott M, Raffel A, Krausch M, Knoefel WT, et al. Pathology of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Chirurg Z Alle Geb Oper Med. 2011;82(7):567–73. PubMed PMID: 21487814. Pathologie neuroendokriner Neoplasien.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Mlika M, Zendah I, Braham E, El Mezni F. CD56 antibody: old-fashioned or still trendy in endocrine lung tumors. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2015;36(4):414–9. PubMed PMID: 25140506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Johnson H, Cohen C, Fatima N, Duncan D, Siddiqui MT. Thyroid transcription factor 1 and Napsin A double stain: utilizing different vendor antibodies for diagnosing lung adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(6):596–602. PubMed PMID: 23207437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Surrey LF, Frank R, Zhang PJ, Furth EE. TTF-1 and Napsin-A are expressed in a subset of cholangiocarcinomas arising from the gallbladder and hepatic ducts: continued caveats for utilization of immunohistochemistry panels. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(2):224–7. PubMed PMID: 24418856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gauri R. Varadhachary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raghav, K., Varadhachary, G.R. (2016). Favorable Subsets Among Cancers of Unknown Primary. In: Krämer, A., Löffler, H. (eds) Cancer of Unknown Primary. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22581-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22581-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22580-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22581-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics