Abstract
Each year, natural and anthropogenic crises disrupt the lives of millions of people. Local, national, and international crisis response systems struggle to cope with urgent needs during and immediately after a crisis. The challenges multiply as population grows, density of urban areas increases, and coastal areas become more vulnerable to rising sea levels. A typical crisis scenario requires coordinating many diverse players, including local, national and international military, other governmental, and non-governmental organizations. Often, no single entity is in charge of the response, making coordination even more difficult. There is an urgent need for better ways to allocate resources, maintain situation awareness, and reallocate resources as the situation changes. Information fusion is vital to effective resource allocation and situation awareness. Some of the greatest inefficiencies stem from the inability to exchange information between systems designed for different purposes and operating under different ownership. Information integration and fusion are too often entirely manual. Greater automation could support more timely, better coordinated responses in situations where time is of the essence. The greatest need is not for low-level fusion of sensor reports to classify and track individual objects, but for high-level fusion to characterize complex situations and support planning of effective responses. This paper describes challenges of high-level fusion for crisis management, proposes a technical framework for addressing high-level fusion, and discusses how effectively addressing HLF challenges can improve efficiency of crisis response. We illustrate our ideas with a case study involving a humanitarian relief operation in a flooding scenario.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bajoria J (2011) Improving UN responses to humanitarian crises. UN Chron XLVIII(4)
Carey S, Kleiner M, Hieb M, Brown R (2001) Standardizing battle management language—a vital move towards the army transformation. In: IEEE fall simulation interoperability workshop, Orlando
Carvalho R (2011) Probabilistic ontology: representation and modeling methodology. Ph.D. dissertation, Systems Engineering and Operations Research, George Mason University
da Costa PCG (2005) Bayesian semantics for the semantic web. Ph.D. dissertation, Information Technology, George Mason University
da Costa PCG, Ladeira M, Carvalho RN, Laskey KB, Santos LL, Matsumoto S (2008) A first-order Bayesian tool for probabilistic ontologies. In: FLAIRS conference, pp 631–636
Ding Z (2005) BayesOWL: a probabilistic framework for semantic web. Ph.D. dissertation, Science of Computation, University of Maryland
Edelkamp S, Hoffmann J (2004) PDDL2.2: The language for the classical. In: 4th International planning competition, 2004, proceedings…[S.l.:s.n], edn. Bibliography, p 118
Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 37:32–64(33). doi:10.1518/001872095779049543. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/hf/1995/00000037/00000001/art00004
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014) National preparedness cycle. https://www.fema.gov/national-preparedness-cycle. Accessed 30 Dec 2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014) Private section fact sheet. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/privatesector/saver_factsheet.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2014
Fox M, Long D (2003) PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. J Artif Intell Res 20(1):61–124
Franklin E, White J (1987) Data fusion lexicon. Technical report, Joint Directors of Laboratories, Technical Panel for C3, Data Fusion Sub-Panel, Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Gerevini A, Long D (2005) Plan constraints and preferences in PDDL3. In: 5th International planning competition, 2005, proceedings…[S.l.:s.n], edn.
Ghallab M, Nau D, Traverso P (2004) Automated planning theory and practice. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam
Goldman RP (2004) Ontologies and planners a statement of interest. In: AAAI spring symposium. Technical report, vol 4, pp 103–105
Horridge M, Patel-Schneider P (2012) OWL 2 web ontology language Manchester syntax, 2nd edn. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax. Accessed 05 Jan 2015
Hughes DJ (ed) (1993) Moltke on the art of war: selected writings. Presidio Press, New York
Humphries V (2013) Improving humanitarian coordination: common challenges and lessons learned from the cluster approach. J Humanit Assist. http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/1976
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2006) IASC guidance note on using the cluster approach to strengthen humanitarian response. Technical report. http://www.refworld.org/docid/460a8ccc2.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2014
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2013) Official site. http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/. Accessed 28 Dec 2014
Laskey KB (2008) MEBN: A language for first-order Bayesian knowledge bases. Artif Intell 172(2–3):140–178
Lewis G, Lander B (2011) Only as strong as our weakest link: can the humanitarian system be collectively accountable to affected populations? Humanit Exch Mag 52
Marques HC (2012) inference model with probabilistic ontologies to support automation in effects-based operations planning. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos
Marques HC, de Oliveira JMP, da Costa PCG (2011) Representing COA with probabilistic ontologies. In: Proceedings of the international command and control research and technology symposium
Martin SF, Weerasinghe S, Taylor A (eds) (2014) Humanitarian crises and migration: causes, consequences and responses. Routledge, New York
McDermott D, Ghallab M, Howe A, Knoblock C, Ram A, Veloso M, Weld D, Wilkins D (1998) PDDL—the planning domain definition language, version 1.2. Technical report, TR-98-003, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mfourman/tools/propplan/pddl.pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
Nau D, Ilghami O, Kuter U, Murdock JW, Wu D, Yaman F (2003) SHOP2: an HTN planning system. J Artif Intell Res 20:379–404
Newman W (1999) Steel bank common Lisp (SBCL). http://www.sbcl.org/. Accessed 2015-01-03
Pednault EPD (1989) ADL: exploring the middle ground between STRIPS and the situation calculus. In: Proceedings of the international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishing, San Francisco, pp 324–332
Predoiu L, Stuckenschmidt H (2008) Probabilistic extensions of semantic web languages: a survey. In: Ma Z, Wang H (eds) The semantic web for knowledge and data management: technologies and practices. Idea Group, Hershey
Rasmussen J (1993) Deciding and doing: decision-making in natural contexts. In: Klein G et al (ed) Decision-making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood
Saucedo AA (2013) OODA (observe, orient, decide, and act). In: Piehler GK (ed) Encyclopedia of military science, 0 edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1016–1019. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452276335. Accessed 04 Jan 2015
Schade U, Hieb MR (2006) Formalizing battle management language: a grammar for specifying orders. In: IEEE spring simulation interoperability workshop
Schade U, Hieb MR (2007) Improving planning and replanning: using a formal grammar to automate processing of command and control information for decision support. Int C2 J 1(2):69–90
Seybolt TB (2000) Systemic network analysis of refugee relief: a business-like approach. Text. http://reliefweb.int/report/world/systemic-network-analysis-refugee-relief-business-approach
Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (2012) Official site. http://www.sisostds.org/Home.aspx. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
Smith EA (2002) Effects based operations: applying network centric warfare in peace, crisis and war. CCRP, Alexandria
Stanford University (2009) Description logic query language: Dl query. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/DLQueryTab. Accessed 02 Jan 2015
Stanford University (2012) Protégé project. http://protege.stanford.edu. Accessed 02 Jan 2015
Steinberg AN, Bowman CL, White FE (1999) Revisions to the jdl data fusion model. doi:10.1117/12.341367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.341367
Street AM (2009) Humanitarian reform a progress report. Humanit Exch Mag 45
Ubuntu (2015) Ubuntu OS. Available at: http://www.ubuntu.com/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
Ushahidi (2008) Official site. www.ushahidi.com. Accessed 27 Dec 2014
VMWare (2014) Official site. http://www.vmware.com. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
VT MÄK (2012) VR-Forces. http://www.mak.com/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
W3C (2004) OWL web ontology language. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features. Accessed 01 Jan 2015
W3C (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language document overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/. Accessed 01 Jan 2015
Yang Q (1997) Intelligent planning: a decomposition and abstraction based approach. Springer, London
Yonetani M (2014) Global estimates 2014: people displaced by disasters. Technical report, Norwegian Refugee Council. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/201409-global-estimates.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2014
Younes H, Littman M (2004) PPDDL: the probabilistic planning domain definition language. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge VT MÄK for providing the VR-Forces simulation and visualization tools for research use, and thank Shou Matsumoto for UnBBayes support and software engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laskey, K.B., Marques, H.C., da Costa, P.C.G. (2016). High-Level Fusion for Crisis Response Planning. In: Rogova, G., Scott, P. (eds) Fusion Methodologies in Crisis Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22527-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22527-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22526-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22527-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)