Skip to main content

High-Level Fusion for Crisis Response Planning

  • Chapter
Fusion Methodologies in Crisis Management

Abstract

Each year, natural and anthropogenic crises disrupt the lives of millions of people. Local, national, and international crisis response systems struggle to cope with urgent needs during and immediately after a crisis. The challenges multiply as population grows, density of urban areas increases, and coastal areas become more vulnerable to rising sea levels. A typical crisis scenario requires coordinating many diverse players, including local, national and international military, other governmental, and non-governmental organizations. Often, no single entity is in charge of the response, making coordination even more difficult. There is an urgent need for better ways to allocate resources, maintain situation awareness, and reallocate resources as the situation changes. Information fusion is vital to effective resource allocation and situation awareness. Some of the greatest inefficiencies stem from the inability to exchange information between systems designed for different purposes and operating under different ownership. Information integration and fusion are too often entirely manual. Greater automation could support more timely, better coordinated responses in situations where time is of the essence. The greatest need is not for low-level fusion of sensor reports to classify and track individual objects, but for high-level fusion to characterize complex situations and support planning of effective responses. This paper describes challenges of high-level fusion for crisis management, proposes a technical framework for addressing high-level fusion, and discusses how effectively addressing HLF challenges can improve efficiency of crisis response. We illustrate our ideas with a case study involving a humanitarian relief operation in a flooding scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bajoria J (2011) Improving UN responses to humanitarian crises. UN Chron XLVIII(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey S, Kleiner M, Hieb M, Brown R (2001) Standardizing battle management language—a vital move towards the army transformation. In: IEEE fall simulation interoperability workshop, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho R (2011) Probabilistic ontology: representation and modeling methodology. Ph.D. dissertation, Systems Engineering and Operations Research, George Mason University

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa PCG (2005) Bayesian semantics for the semantic web. Ph.D. dissertation, Information Technology, George Mason University

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa PCG, Ladeira M, Carvalho RN, Laskey KB, Santos LL, Matsumoto S (2008) A first-order Bayesian tool for probabilistic ontologies. In: FLAIRS conference, pp 631–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z (2005) BayesOWL: a probabilistic framework for semantic web. Ph.D. dissertation, Science of Computation, University of Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelkamp S, Hoffmann J (2004) PDDL2.2: The language for the classical. In: 4th International planning competition, 2004, proceedings[S.l.:s.n], edn. Bibliography, p 118

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 37:32–64(33). doi:10.1518/001872095779049543. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hfes/hf/1995/00000037/00000001/art00004

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014) National preparedness cycle. https://www.fema.gov/national-preparedness-cycle. Accessed 30 Dec 2014

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (2014) Private section fact sheet. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/privatesector/saver_factsheet.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2014

  • Fox M, Long D (2003) PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. J Artif Intell Res 20(1):61–124

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin E, White J (1987) Data fusion lexicon. Technical report, Joint Directors of Laboratories, Technical Panel for C3, Data Fusion Sub-Panel, Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerevini A, Long D (2005) Plan constraints and preferences in PDDL3. In: 5th International planning competition, 2005, proceedings[S.l.:s.n], edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghallab M, Nau D, Traverso P (2004) Automated planning theory and practice. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman RP (2004) Ontologies and planners a statement of interest. In: AAAI spring symposium. Technical report, vol 4, pp 103–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge M, Patel-Schneider P (2012) OWL 2 web ontology language Manchester syntax, 2nd edn. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax. Accessed 05 Jan 2015

  • Hughes DJ (ed) (1993) Moltke on the art of war: selected writings. Presidio Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries V (2013) Improving humanitarian coordination: common challenges and lessons learned from the cluster approach. J Humanit Assist. http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/1976

  • Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2006) IASC guidance note on using the cluster approach to strengthen humanitarian response. Technical report. http://www.refworld.org/docid/460a8ccc2.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2014

  • Inter-Agency Standing Committee (2013) Official site. http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/. Accessed 28 Dec 2014

  • Laskey KB (2008) MEBN: A language for first-order Bayesian knowledge bases. Artif Intell 172(2–3):140–178

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G, Lander B (2011) Only as strong as our weakest link: can the humanitarian system be collectively accountable to affected populations? Humanit Exch Mag 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques HC (2012) inference model with probabilistic ontologies to support automation in effects-based operations planning. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques HC, de Oliveira JMP, da Costa PCG (2011) Representing COA with probabilistic ontologies. In: Proceedings of the international command and control research and technology symposium

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin SF, Weerasinghe S, Taylor A (eds) (2014) Humanitarian crises and migration: causes, consequences and responses. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott D, Ghallab M, Howe A, Knoblock C, Ram A, Veloso M, Weld D, Wilkins D (1998) PDDL—the planning domain definition language, version 1.2. Technical report, TR-98-003, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control. http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mfourman/tools/propplan/pddl.pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

  • Nau D, Ilghami O, Kuter U, Murdock JW, Wu D, Yaman F (2003) SHOP2: an HTN planning system. J Artif Intell Res 20:379–404

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newman W (1999) Steel bank common Lisp (SBCL). http://www.sbcl.org/. Accessed 2015-01-03

  • Pednault EPD (1989) ADL: exploring the middle ground between STRIPS and the situation calculus. In: Proceedings of the international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishing, San Francisco, pp 324–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Predoiu L, Stuckenschmidt H (2008) Probabilistic extensions of semantic web languages: a survey. In: Ma Z, Wang H (eds) The semantic web for knowledge and data management: technologies and practices. Idea Group, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1993) Deciding and doing: decision-making in natural contexts. In: Klein G et al (ed) Decision-making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucedo AA (2013) OODA (observe, orient, decide, and act). In: Piehler GK (ed) Encyclopedia of military science, 0 edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1016–1019. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452276335. Accessed 04 Jan 2015

  • Schade U, Hieb MR (2006) Formalizing battle management language: a grammar for specifying orders. In: IEEE spring simulation interoperability workshop

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade U, Hieb MR (2007) Improving planning and replanning: using a formal grammar to automate processing of command and control information for decision support. Int C2 J 1(2):69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Seybolt TB (2000) Systemic network analysis of refugee relief: a business-like approach. Text. http://reliefweb.int/report/world/systemic-network-analysis-refugee-relief-business-approach

  • Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (2012) Official site. http://www.sisostds.org/Home.aspx. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

  • Smith EA (2002) Effects based operations: applying network centric warfare in peace, crisis and war. CCRP, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University (2009) Description logic query language: Dl query. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/DLQueryTab. Accessed 02 Jan 2015

  • Stanford University (2012) Protégé project. http://protege.stanford.edu. Accessed 02 Jan 2015

  • Steinberg AN, Bowman CL, White FE (1999) Revisions to the jdl data fusion model. doi:10.1117/12.341367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.341367

  • Street AM (2009) Humanitarian reform a progress report. Humanit Exch Mag 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubuntu (2015) Ubuntu OS. Available at: http://www.ubuntu.com/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

  • Ushahidi (2008) Official site. www.ushahidi.com. Accessed 27 Dec 2014

  • VMWare (2014) Official site. http://www.vmware.com. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

  • VT MÄK (2012) VR-Forces. http://www.mak.com/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

  • W3C (2004) OWL web ontology language. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features. Accessed 01 Jan 2015

  • W3C (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language document overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/. Accessed 01 Jan 2015

  • Yang Q (1997) Intelligent planning: a decomposition and abstraction based approach. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yonetani M (2014) Global estimates 2014: people displaced by disasters. Technical report, Norwegian Refugee Council. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/201409-global-estimates.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2014

  • Younes H, Littman M (2004) PPDDL: the probabilistic planning domain definition language. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/. Accessed 03 Jan 2015

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge VT MÄK for providing the VR-Forces simulation and visualization tools for research use, and thank Shou Matsumoto for UnBBayes support and software engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn B. Laskey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laskey, K.B., Marques, H.C., da Costa, P.C.G. (2016). High-Level Fusion for Crisis Response Planning. In: Rogova, G., Scott, P. (eds) Fusion Methodologies in Crisis Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22527-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22527-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22526-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22527-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics