Skip to main content

Communicative and Ethical Aspects of the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Extreme Situations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hysterectomy
  • 763 Accesses

Abstract

The prime focus of medical practice is medical care. Medical care, by its very nature, is unique, unrepeatable and irrevocable. The element of irreversibility and permanent contact with the biological existence of a patient impose an enormous burden on the physician. The human being should always be viewed as an integral whole. A doctor should avoid focusing on the illness alone, and is also expected to fulfill the patient’s expectations in regard of individual treatment and care.

The present report addresses the theoretical basis of the doctor-patient relationship and is focused on the patient’s autonomy. Fields of interaction and the increasing demands faced by physicians are discussed in detail. A successful physician-patient relationship can be learned quite easily and applied in all medical specialties. The physician-patient relationship constitutes the foundation of the patient’s satisfaction as well as the success of treatment.

The communication models presented here can be used in surgical gynecology equally for benign and malignant diseases, and should also be considered when dealing with the rising number of high-risk pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The dictum is attributed to the Roman physician Scribonius Largus, court physician of the emperor Tiberius Claudius Nero Caesar Drusus who ruled Rome around 50 A.D. A similar phrase is also found in the Corpus Hippocraticum (Epidemics, Book I, Section XI).

  2. 2.

    In: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: West-Östlicher Diwan, Frankfurt am Main 1999, page 47.

References

  1. Wieland W. Strukturwandel der Medizin und ärztliche Ethik – philosophische Überlegungen zu Grundfragen einer praktischen Wissenschaft. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gethmann CF. Gesundheit nach Maß? Eine transdisziplinäre Studie zu den Grundlagen eines dauerhaften Gesundheitssystems. Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers CR. Therapeut und Klient: Grundlagen der Gesprächspsychotherapie. 20th ed. Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mittelstraß J. Enzyklopädie: Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie . Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag; 2004.Special Edition ed

    Google Scholar 

  5. Argyle M. Körpersprache und Kommunikation: Das Handbuch zur nonverbalen Kommunikation. 9th ed. Junfermann Verlag: Paderborn; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geisler LS. Patient autonomy–a critical concept analysis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004;129(9):453–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers CR. Entwicklung der Persönlichkeit. 13 th ed. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finke J. Gesprächspychotherapie – Grundlagen und spezifische Anwendungen. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith CM. Origin and uses of primum non nocere–above all, do no harm! J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45(4):371–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schöne-Seifert B. Medizinethik. In: Nida-Rümelin J, editor. Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Ein Handbuch. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag; 2005. p. 690–803.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alkatout I, Rummer A. Intrauterines Lebensrecht von Zwillingen mit ungleichen Überlebenschancen – Kommentar zum Fall. Ethik in der Medizin. 2011;23(3):233–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabl C, Jox RJ. Paternalism and autonomy–no contradiction. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(23–24):642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marckmann G, Bormuth M. Arzt-Patient-Verhältnis und Informiertes Einverständnis. In: Wiesing U, editor. Ethik in der Medizin. Ein Reader. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam; 2000. p. 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krones T, Richter G. Physicians' responsibility: doctor-patient relationship. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008;51(8):818–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. von Engelhardt D. Ethik in der Onkologie – Dem kranken Menschen gerecht werden. Im Focus Onkologie. 2006;09:65–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marckmann G, Mayer F. Ethische Fallbesprechungen in der Onkologie – Grundlagen einer prinzipienorientierten Falldiskussion. Der Onkologe. 2009;10(15):980–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krones T, Richter G. Die Arzt-Patient-Beziehung. In: Schulz S, Seigleder K, Fangerau H, NW P, editors. Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 2006. p. 94–117.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolf E, Lahrmann H. The seriously affected stroke patient who is not able to communicate – treatment to the best of one’s knowledge and ethical principles. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2014;164(9–10):195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meran JG. Palliative care and quality of life as therapy goal. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2012;162(1–2):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Espinel AG, Shah RK, Beach MC, Boss EF. What parents say about their child's surgeon: parent-reported experiences with pediatric surgical physicians. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(5):397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn J, Mandraka F, Fröhlich G. Ethische Aspekte in der Therapie kritisch kranker Tumorpatienten. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin. 2007;44(7):416–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, Wilson P, Gregory WM, Armes PJ, et al. Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ. 1990;300(6737):1458–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Silvestri G, Pritchard R, Welch HG. Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviews. BMJ. 1998;317(7161):771–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Krones CJ, Willis S, Steinau G, Schumpelick V. Current patient perceptions of the physician. Chirurg. 2006;77(8):718–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulz S. Person oder Keim? Der moralische Status des Ungeborenen in der Geschichte der Abtreibungsdiskussion. In: Schulz S, Seigleder K, Fangerau H, NW P, editors. Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 2006. p. 303–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Alkatout .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alkatout, I. (2018). Communicative and Ethical Aspects of the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Extreme Situations. In: Alkatout, I., Mettler, L. (eds) Hysterectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22496-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22497-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics