Advertisement

Local-Global Tension in the Ideological Construction of English Language Education Policy in Nepal

  • Prem PhyakEmail author
Part of the Language Policy book series (LAPO, volume 11)

Abstract

In this chapter, I analyze ideologies of the de facto English-as-the-medium-of-instruction policy in Nepal’s school level education system. By situating the current language policy in Nepal’s multilingual context, I also discuss how this policy reproduces social inequalities between the rich and the poor, and how it negatively affects children’s access to the academic content. My analysis shows that the current de facto English language policy is shaped by two major ideologies – English-as-a-global-language and English-as-social-capital – that ignore the local multilingual and multicultural realities surrounding students’ everyday lives and disregard the evidence that students’ home languages can be a resource for learning both content and language. More importantly, the analysis reveals increased tensions between the local and global ideologies by showing that the English language policy contradicts the Ministry of Education’s mother-tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) policy, the latter of which aims to promote the use of local languages as the medium of instruction up to Grade 3.

Keywords

English-as-the-medium-of-instruction Language ideology Neoliberalism Multilingual education English-as-social-capital 

References

  1. Ager, D. (2001). Motivation in language planning and language policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  2. Al’Abri, K. (2011). The impact of globalization on education policy of developing countries: Oman as an example. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 2(4), 491–502.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Issa, A. S., & Al-Bulushi, A. H. (2012). English language teaching reform in sultanate of Oman: The case of theory and practice disparity. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(2), 141–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Jardani, K. S. S. (2012). English language curriculum evaluation in Oman. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 40–43.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York/London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Annamalai, E. (2013). India’s economic restructuring with English: Benefits and costs. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed., pp. 191–208). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Awasthi, L. D. (2008). Importation of ideologies: From Macaulay minutes to wood commission. Journal of Education and Research, 1(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Baldauf, R. B. (2006). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benson, C. (2014). Adopting a multilingual habitus: What north and south can learn from each other about the essential role of non-dominant languages in education. In D. Gorter, V. Zenotz, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Minority languages and multilingual education: Bridging the local and the global (pp. 11–28). New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Blommaert, J. (2013). Policy, policing and the ecology of social norms: Ethnographic monitoring revisited. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 219, 123–140.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Caddell, M. (2006). Private schools as battlefields: Contested visions of learning and livelihood in Nepal. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(4), 463–479.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, H. (2011). Developing countries and the English language: Rhetoric, risks, roles and recommendations. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 9–22). London: British Council.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, J. (2006). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multiliteracy pedagogy. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 51–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Curriculum Development Center. (2007). Curriculum for secondary level. Bhaktapur: Curriculum Development Center.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, A. (2009). Professional advice vs political imperatives. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp. 45–63). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  21. Davies, A., Glendenning, E., & McLean, A. (1984). Survey of English language teaching in Nepal. Report presented to the His Majesty’s Government Ministry of Education and Culture, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, K. A. (2014). Engaged language policy and practices. Language Policy, 13(2), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department of Education. (2012). School level educational statistics of Nepal. Bhaktapur: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Draper, J. (2012). Reconsidering compulsory English in developing countries in Asia: English in a community of northeast Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 777–811.Google Scholar
  25. Eagle, S. (2008). The language situation in Nepal: A 2007 update. In R. B. Kaplan & R. B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia (Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters, Vol. 1, pp. 226–236). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  26. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Giri, R. A. (2011). Languages and language politics: How invisible language politics produces visible results in Nepal. Language Problems and Language Planning, 35(3), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heller, M. (2006). Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography (2nd ed.). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  30. Heugh, K. (2000). The case against bilingual and multilingual education in South Africa (Vol. 3). Cape Town: PRAESA.Google Scholar
  31. Hornberger, N. H. (2010). Multilingual education policy and practice: Lessons from indigenous experience. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/digest_pdfs/MultilingualEducationFinalWeb.pdf
  32. Hough, D., Thapa-Magar, R. B., & Yonjan-Tamang, A. (2009). Privileging indigenous knowledges: Empowering MLE in Nepal. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson, A. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 159–176). Bristol/Tonawanda/Ontario: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  33. Irvine, J. T. (1989). When the talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16, 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, R. B., Baldauf, R. B., Jr., & Kamwangamalu, N. (2011). Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. KC, S. B. (2011, January 5). Pupils throng English-medium community schools. Republica. Retrieved from http://archives. myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=30822
  36. Kirkpatrick, A. (2013). The lingua franca approach to the teaching of English: A possible pathway to genuine multilingualism in local language and English. In H. McIlwraith (Ed.), Multilingual education in Africa: Lessons from the Juba language-in-education conference (pp. 11–16). London: British Council.Google Scholar
  37. Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. LoBianco, J. (2010). Language policy and planning. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 143–174). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  39. Luke, A., Luke, C., & Graham, P. (2007). Globalization, corporatism, and critical language. International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Makihara, M., & Schieffelin, B. (2007). Cultural processes and linguistic mediations: Pacific explorations. In M. Makihara & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Consequences of contact: Language ideologies and sociocultural transformations in Pacific societies (pp. 3–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malla, K. P. (1977). English in Nepalese education. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Google Scholar
  42. McCarty, T. L. (2006). Voice and choice in indigenous language revitalization. Journal of Language, Culture, and Identity, 5(4), 201–225.Google Scholar
  43. McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. McGroarty, M. (2013). Multiple actors and arenas in evolving language policy. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed., pp. 35–57). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Ministry of Education. (2003). Education for all: Nepal national plan of action. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Education. (2005). National curriculum framework for school education (pre-primary-12) in Nepal. Bhaktapur: Curriculum Development Center.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Education. (2006). Education Act (education and sports related some Nepal acts amendment). Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Education. (2009a). School sector reform plan 2009–2015. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  49. Ministry of Education. (2009b). Manual for implementing multilingual education. Bhaktapur: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  50. Nepal National Education Planning Commission. (1956). Education in Nepal: Report of the Nepal education planning commission. Kathmandu: His Majesty’s Government.Google Scholar
  51. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  53. Park, J. S.-Y., & Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Pennycook, A. (2013). Language policies, language ideologies and local language practices. In L. Wee, R. B. Goh, & L. Lim (Eds.), The politics of English: South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phillipson, R. (2006). English, a cuckoo in the European higher education nest of languages? European Journal of English Studies, 10(01), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phyak, P. (2011). Beyond the façade of language planning for Nepalese primary education: Monolingual hangover, elitism and displacement of local languages? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Phyak, P. (2013). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium-of-instruction policy: A critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phyak, P. (2015). (En)countering language ideologies: Language policing in the ideospace of facebook. Language Policy. DOI:  10.1007/s10993-014-9350-y.
  59. Phyak, P., & Bui, T. T. N. (2014). Youth engaging language policy and planning: Ideologies and transformations from within. Language Policy, 13(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Piller, I., & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  62. Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2015). Language policy and political economy: English in a global context. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sharma, G. N. (1990). The impact of education during the Rana period in Nepal. Himalayan Research Bulletin, 10(2/3), 3–7.Google Scholar
  64. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne, W. Hanks, & C. Hofbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  66. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Heugh, K. (Eds.). (2012). Multilingual education and sustainable diversity work: From periphery to center. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Sonntag, S. K. (2003). The local politics of global English: Case studies in linguistic globalization. Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  68. Sonntag, S. K. (2007). Change and permanence in language politics in Nepal. In A. B. M. Tsui & J. W. Tollefson (Eds.), Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 205–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  69. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Subedi, G., Shrestha, M. G., Maharjan, R., & Suvedi, M. (2013). Dimensions and implications of privatization of education in Nepal: The case of primary and secondary schools. Budapest/London/New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
  71. Taylor, S. K. (2010). Beyond bilingual education: Multilingual language education in Nepal. Gist: Revista Colombiana de Educación Bilingüe, 4, 138–154.Google Scholar
  72. The Himalayan Times. (2010, December 11). Govt schools go English. The Himalayan Times. Retrieved from http://thehimalayantimes.com/fullTodays.php?headline=Govt+schools+go+English&NewsID=265277
  73. Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Introduction: Critical issues in educational language policy. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 3–16). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.). (2013). Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Weinberg, M. (2013). Revisiting history in language policy: The case of medium of instruction in Nepal. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 28(1), 61–80.Google Scholar
  76. Whelpton, J. (2005). A history of Nepal. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Williams, E. (2011). Language policy, politics and development in Africa. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 39–56). London: British Council.Google Scholar
  78. Yadava, Y. (2007). Linguistic diversity in Nepal: Perspectives on language policy. A paper presented at an international seminar on Constitutionalism and Diversity in Nepal, Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
  79. Zhao, S. (2011). Actors in language in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 905–923). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Tribhuvan UniversityKirtipurNepal

Personalised recommendations