Advertisement

English Education Policy in India

  • Hema RamanathanEmail author
Part of the Language Policy book series (LAPO, volume 11)

Abstract

Expansion of access to education in India, and the resultant increase of students in schools, are greatly impacting English language teaching in India. Traditionally, the focus of teaching and testing has been on reading and writing. The emphasis on speaking and listening skills are driven by societal demand and an evaluation program. Students’ desire to learn English as a second or first language rather than a foreign language is shown by the dramatic growth of English medium schools. Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation program, an assessment model that is sweeping the country, includes features that entail teaching speaking and listening skills. However, the demand for a re-focusing of skills is not supported by changes in curriculum, pedagogy or teacher education. In a society where English proficiency guarantees economic and social upward mobility, much greater investment in research that informs policy and practice is necessary but does not seem to be forthcoming.

Keywords

ELT in India ELT curriculum in India ELT pedagogy in India Teacher education in India Continuous and comprehensive evaluation Three language policy in India 

References

  1. Aggarwal, S. (1991). Three language formula: An educational problem. New Delhi, India: Gyan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  2. Annamalai, E. (2001). Managing multilingualism in India: Political and linguistic manifestations. New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. W., (Ed.), Krathwohl, D. R., (Ed.), Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (complete edition). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Aslam, M., Kingdon, G., De, A., & Kumar, R. (2010). Economic returns to schooling and skills: An analysis of India and Pakistan. RECOUP Working Paper No. 38. Online at http://recoup.educ.cam.ac.uk/publications/WP38-returns_to_education.pdf
  5. Azam, M., Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2010) The returns to English-language skills in India. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion paper no. 4802. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp4802.html
  6. Behera, A. (2013). ELT in India. An analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatt, R. (2005). Expert discourses local practices and hybridity: The case of Indian Englishes. In A. S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Bolitho, R., & Padwad, A. (2013). Continuing professional development: Lessons from India. New Delhi, India: The British Council.Google Scholar
  9. Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Canagarajah, S. (2014). In search of a new paradigm for teaching English as an international language. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Central Advisory Board of Education. (1957). Report of the central advisory board of education. New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  12. Central Board of Secondary Education. (n.d.). CBSE: Continuous and comprehensive evaluation. http://www.cbse.nic.in/cce/index.html
  13. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). (2009). Subject: Examination reforms and continuous and comprehensive evaluation (CCE) in the central board of secondary education (CBSE) No. CBSE/ACAD/2009 20th September 2009 Circular No. 39/20-09-2009 http://cbse.nic.in/circulars/cir39-2009.pdf
  14. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). (2012). Circular No: Acad-8/2012: Introduction of novels in English in classes IX to XI I in the schools affiliated to CBSE w.e.f. academic session 2012–13.Google Scholar
  15. Farr, M., & Song, J. (2011). Language ideologies and policies: Multilingualism and education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 650–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goel, D. R., & Goel, C. (2012). Teacher education scenario in India: Current problems & concerns. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 2(2), 231–242.Google Scholar
  17. Government of India Ministry of Human Resources Development Teacher Education Department of School Education and Literacy. (n.d.). Reforms in Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://www.teindia.nic.in/reforming_TE.aspx
  18. Gupta, D. (2004). CLT in India: Context and methodology come together. ELT Journal, 58(3), 266–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamid, M. O., Sussex, R., & Khan, A. (2009). Private tutoring in English for secondary school students in Bangladesh. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 281–308. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00168.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. iValue Consulting Private Ltd. (n.d.). English language training market India: Market opportunity report. Retrieved from www.britishcouncil.in/sites/britishcouncil&/draft_elt_report_24_dec.pdf
  21. James, Z., & Woodhead, M. (2014). Choosing and changing schools in India’s private and government sectors: Young lives evidence from Andhra Pradesh. Oxford Review of Education, 40(1).Google Scholar
  22. Justice Verma Commission on Teacher Education. (2012). Government of India Ministry of Human Resources Development. Retrieved from http://www.ncte-india.org/Commission.asp
  23. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kannan, J. (2013). Curriculum reforms in a non-threatening collaborative environment: An Indian initiative. In C. J. Craig, P. C. Meijer, & J. Broeckmans (Eds.), From Teacher Thinking to Teachers and Teaching: The evolution of a research community. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  25. Kingdon, G. G., & Sipahamalani-Rao, V. (2010). Para-teachers in India: Status and impact. Economic and political weekly (pp. 59–67).Google Scholar
  26. Krishna Kumar. (2013, September 14). The state of education in India: Knowledge, equity and democratic rights.’ The 28th Dr Ramanadham Memorial meeting lecture organised by people’s union for democratic rights, Delhi. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/KrishnaKumarRamanadhamLecture2013
  27. Luk, J. C. M. (2005). Exploring communicative language teaching for global communication. In A. S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Mahapatra, A. (2007) Mainstreaming child-centered learning: Activity-based learning in Tamil Nadu, India. Retrieved from http://www.ashanet.org/siliconvalley/asha20/pdfs/d2_abl_d3.pdf
  29. Mahboob, A. (2014). Englishes in multilingual contexts. In A. Mahboob & L. Barratt (Eds.), Englishes in multilingual contexts: Language variation and education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Menon, M. (2013, April 2). Going global losing the local? Teacher plus. Retrieved from http://www.teacherplus.org/cover-story/going-global-losing-the-local
  31. Nagarajan, R. (2014, January 5). Those who speak English fluently earn up to 34 % more than others: Study. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/jobs/those-who-speak-english-fluently-earn-up-to-34-more-than-others-study/articleshow/28426329.cms
  32. National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2011). Program evaluation report: Activity based learning Tamil Nadu. Delhi: NCERT.Google Scholar
  33. National Curriculum Framework. (2005). New Delhi, India: National Council of Educational Research and Training.Google Scholar
  34. National Council for Teacher Education Notification. (2010, August 23). http://www.ncte-india.org/Norms/RTE-3.pdf
  35. National Council for Teacher Education Notification. (2014, November 28). http://www.ncte-india.org/Regulation_2014%28Hindi%20&%20English%29.pdf
  36. Padwad, A. (2014). Research in English language education in Indian universities: A directory. Retrieved on August 28, 2015, from http://www.lulu.com/shop/amol-padwad/research-in-english-language-education-in-indian-universities-adirectory/paperback/product-21832707.html.
  37. Planning Commission, Government of India. (2011). Report of planning group workgroup on teacher education for the 12th five year plan. Department of School Education and Literacy Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India.Google Scholar
  38. Planning Commission, Government of India. (2013). Twelfth five year plan (2012–2017) (Vol. 3). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Ramanathan, H. (2008). Testing of English in India: A developing concept. Language Testing, 25(1), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramanathan, H. (2014). Teacher knowledge and English language teaching – Lessons from Nagaland. Languaging, 5, 22–37.Google Scholar
  41. Ramanathan, H., & Bruning, M. (2003). Reflection on teaching oral English skills in India: A research report. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 7(1), 48–55.Google Scholar
  42. Saini, A. (2000). Literacy and empowerment: An Indian scenario. Childhood Education International Focus Issue, 76(6), 381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarath, A. (2010, October 22). Activity-based learning attempts to improve Tamil Nadu’s education level. Retrieved from http://blog.klp.org.in/2010/10/activity-based-learning-attempts-to.html
  44. Sarva Shisksha Abhyan Education for All. (n.d.). New initiatives and projects: Activity based learning. Retrieved from http://www.ssa.tn.nic.in/CurrActivities-A.htm
  45. Secondary Education Commission. (1953). Report of the secondary education commission (1952–53). New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  46. Secondary Education Commission. (1965). Report of the secondary education commission (1964–65). New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  47. Thangavelu, S. (n.d.). Activity based learning: A radical change in primary education. UNICEF. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/india/education_1546.htm
  48. Tooley, J. (2009). A beautiful tree. New Delhi, India: Penguin India.Google Scholar
  49. Tooley, J., Bao, Y., Dixon, P., & Merrifield, J. (2011). School choice and academic performance: Some evidence from developing countries. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 5(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. UNESCO. (2014). Education for all global monitoring report 2013/14: Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  51. UNESCO. Teachers for Education for All (2012). Fourth International Policy Dialogue Forum. Retrieved from http://www.teachersforefa.unesco.org/int/en/ressources/category/6-4pdfindia.html
  52. United Nations. (2014). We can end poverty 2015: Millennium development goals. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  53. University Education Commission. (1949). Report of the University education commission. New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  54. Walia, D. N. (2012). Traditional teaching methods vs. CLT: A study. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3, 125–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of West GeorgiaCarrolltonUSA

Personalised recommendations