Skip to main content

Comparison of Subset-Based Local and Finite Element-Based Global Digital Image Correlation

  • Conference paper
Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3

Abstract

Subset-based local DIC and finite element-based (FE-based) global DIC are the two primary image matching methods that have been extensively investigated and regularly used in experimental mechanics community. Due to its straightforward implementation and high efficiency, subset-based local DIC has been used in almost all commercial DIC packages. However, it is assumed by some researchers that element-based global DIC offers better accuracy because of the enforced continuity between element nodes. Thus there is a pressing need to comprehensively examine the performance of these two DIC approaches. In this work, theoretical analyses of the standard deviation errors of classic subset-based DIC and two FE-based DIC techniques are first performed. Then, by measuring displacements of the same calculation points using the same calculation algorithms and identical calculation parameters, the performances of subset-based local DIC and two FE-based global DIC approaches are compared experimentally in terms of measurement error and computation efficiency using numerical tests and real experiments. A detailed examination of both the theoretical and experimental results reveals that, when subset (element) size is not very small, standard subset-based local DIC approach not only provides better results in measured displacements, but also demonstrates much higher computation efficiency. However, several special merits of FE-based global DIC approaches are indicated.

Partial contents of this paper have been published in Experimental Mechanics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. B. Pan, K. Qian, H. Xie, A. Asundi, Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20(6), 062001 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.J. Orteu, 3-D computer vision in experimental mechanics. Opt. Lasers Eng. 47(3-4), 282–291 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H.A. Bruck, S.R. McNeill, M.A. Sutton et al., Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp. Mech. 29(3), 261–267 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Pan, K. Li, A fast digital image correlation method for deformation measurement. Opt. Lasers Eng. 49(7), 841–847 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Pan, K. Li, W. Tong, Fast, robust and accurate DIC calculation without redundant computations. Exp. Mech. 53(7), 1277–1289 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Sun, J.H.L. Pang, C.K. Wong et al., Finite element formulation for a digital image correlation method. Appl. Opt. 44(34), 7357–7363 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Besnard, F. Hild, S. Roux, Finite-element” displacement fields analysis from digital images: application to Portevin–Le Châtelier bands. Exp. Mech. 46(6), 789–803 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ma, Z. Zhao, X. Wang, Mesh-based digital image correlation method using higher order isoparametric elements. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 47(3), 163–175 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Hild, S. Roux, Comparison of local and global approaches to digital image correlation. Exp. Mech. 52(9), 1503–1519 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Pan, Bias error reduction of digital image correlation using Gaussian pre-filtering. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51(10), 1161–1167 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Pan, An evaluation of convergence criteria for digital image correlation using inverse compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm. Strain 50(1), 48–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Pan, H.M. Xie, Z.Y. Wang, K.M. Qian, Z.Y. Wang, Study of subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt. Express 16(10), 7037–7048 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pan, B., Wang, B., Lubineau, G., Moussawi, A. (2016). Comparison of Subset-Based Local and Finite Element-Based Global Digital Image Correlation. In: Jin, H., Yoshida, S., Lamberti, L., Lin, MT. (eds) Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22446-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22446-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22445-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22446-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics