Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring Social Interaction as a Resource in CLIL

  • Chapter
Book cover Peer Interactions in New Content and Language Integrated Settings

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 24))

  • 1039 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses some of the ideas of social interaction as a resource for learning. To begin, it outlines the role of interaction and how the frequency of available interactions may afford active participants valuable means for learning. Further, Vygotsky’s notions of play are presented to demonstrate how it can create optimal situations for the generation of zones of proximal development (ZPDs). The term “scaffolding” represents the aid and support that is needed within the ZPD to help novice learners reach a higher level of understanding and maintain intersubjectivity. Next, this chapter explores some of the theoretical underpinnings of language learning through interaction and by talking. Finally, it reviews some of the current research on spoken language use and interactions in a variety of CLIL contexts. Some quasi-experimental studies and other classroom research suggest that CLIL learners are generally more linguistically proficient than their non-CLIL peers are. However, other studies point out that more rigorous and robust empirical research must be conducted in order for these claims to be substantiated. Meanwhile, recent research using conversation analysis (CA) in CLIL classrooms provides qualitative evidence of what teachers and learners are capable of achieving in joint interactions. It additionally indicates that content learning can occur during peer interactions despite limited foreign language proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have not introduced the salient aspect of “inner speech ” in internalization in this section to avoid overlap with other sections. Instead, I include it in the discussion of inner resources in Sect. 5.3.4.

  2. 2.

    A shovel allows individuals to change the physical world in a way their simple bodies could not (see Lantolf and Thorne 2007), while the keyboard mediates actions in a way one might not expect (see Wertsch 1991).

  3. 3.

    See Sect. 6.4 for a more detailed discussion on CA.

References

  • Atkinson, D. (2011). Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1–23). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2009). Communicative competence in the CLIL lesson. In Y. R. de Zarobe & R. M. J. Catalàn (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 197–214). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaff, R., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, R. T., & Gauvain, M. (1993). The role of age versus expertise in peer collaboration during joint planning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55(2), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 217–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evnitskaya, N., & Morton, T. (2011). Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice. Language and Education, 25(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner, D., & Maillat, D. (2006). Spoken competence in CLIL: A pragmatic take on recent Swiss data. Vienna English Working Papers VIEWS, 15(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. (1984). Perceptual development from the ecological approach. In M. Lamb, A. L. Brown, & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 243–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman, L. (2010). Without creating ZPDs there is no creativity. In M. C. Connery, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 27–39). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1983). Newmark’s “Ignorance Hypothesis” and current second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer and language learning (pp. 135–153). Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurata, N. (2011). Foreign language learning and use: Interaction in social networks. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language earning (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition [Special section]. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). London: Newbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalance approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillat, D. (2010). The pragmatics of L2 in CLIL. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 39–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2005). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 355–374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiations in content-based instruction: Communication as cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 286–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, T. (2005). English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education, 16(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, T. (2007). The IRF pattern and space for interaction: Observation on EFL and CLIL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., & McKinney, C. (2011). An identity approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 73–94). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, E. S. (1993). The intention to use a specific affordance: A conceptual framework for psychology. In R. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumlich, D. (2013). Students’ general English proficiency prior to CLIL: Empirical evidence for substantial differences between prospective CLIL and non-CLIL students in Germany. In S. Breidbach & B. Viebrock (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Europe: Research perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 181–201). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumlich, D. (forthcoming). Evaluating the effects of bilingual education in Germany: The development of NRW CLIL students’ general English language proficiency and their affective-motivational dispositions (DENOCS) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language acquisition. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles & practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinmann, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, E. (1998). Language development in social interactions: A longitudinal study of Japanese FLES program from a Vygotskyan approach. Foreign Language Annals, 31(3), 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, J., & Rogoff, B. (1999). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments (Vol. 3, pp. 32–56). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmeneta, C. E., & Evnitskaya, N. (2014). ‘Do you know Actimel?’ The adaptive nature of dialogic teacher-led discussions in the CLIL science classroom: A case study. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A. (2009). CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written production. In Y. R. de Zarobe & R. M. J. Catalàn (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1999). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language, and thought. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments (Vol. 3, pp. 259–275). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zydatiß, W. (2007). Die Gerechtigkeitsfalle bilingualer Bildungsgänge. In D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner, & W. Zydatiß (Eds.), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule (pp. 161–173). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydatiß, W. (2012). Linguistic threshold in the classroom? The threshold hypothesis revisited. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), Article 2. Retrieved from http://www.icrj.eu/14/article2.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

    Nathan J. Devos

Authors
  1. Nathan J. Devos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Devos, N.J. (2016). Exploring Social Interaction as a Resource in CLIL. In: Peer Interactions in New Content and Language Integrated Settings. Educational Linguistics, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22219-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22219-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22218-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22219-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation