Skip to main content

Cross Section Measurement of the 4j and 2b2j Channels and Comparisons with Predictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Study of Double Parton Scattering Using Four-Jet Scenarios

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

After the data unfolding, absolute and normalized differential cross sections are available at the stable particle level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The same ME, considered in the 4j comparisons, have been used for the validation: a NLO dijet ME with a hard emission for Powheg, a LO 2\(\rightarrow \)4 ME for Madgraph and a LO 2\(\rightarrow \)3 ME for Sherpa.

  2. 2.

    CMS has recently released a new tune, CUETP6S1 [4], which improves the description of UE data at different collision energies; though, this tune has not been considered in these studies because it was not available at the time of the publication.

  3. 3.

    Note that this conclusion seems not to be absolutely valid for every observable: studies related to Drell-Yan \(p_{\text {T}}\) [8] have shown that standalone Pythia6 predictions reproduce the data better than predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia6; in this case, a retuning effort [9] is ongoing in order to fix this inconsistency.

  4. 4.

    The results of the 4j measurements will be discussed in detail in Sect. 10.2.

  5. 5.

    Note that this could not be performed in the data because the phase space available for the selection of b-jets is limited to \(|\eta |\) \(<\) 2.4, and it is not then possible to extend it up to the forward region.

  6. 6.

    Predictions obtained with Madgraph are not included in the comparisons of differential cross sections because of a low number of selected events available for jet \(p_{\text {T}}\) \(>\) 250 GeV.

References

  1. Chatrchyan S et al (2011a) Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV. Phys Rev Lett 107:132001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.132001

  2. Chatrchyan S et al (2011b) Measurement of the underlying event activity at the LHC with \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV. JHEP 1109:109. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2011)109

  3. Chatrchyan S et al (2013) Study of the underlying event at forward rapidity in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 0.9, 2.76, and 7 TeV. JHEP 1304:072. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)072

  4. CMS Collaboration (2014a) Underlying event tunes and double parton scattering (CMS-PAS-GEN-14-001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skands P (2010) Tuning Monte Carlo generators: the Perugia tunes. Phys Rev D 82:074018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074018

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. ATLAS Collaboration (2011) ATLAS tunes of PYTHIA 6 and Pythia 8 for MC11. (ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-009, ATL-COM-PHYS-2011-744)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sjöstrand T et al (2006) PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. JHEP 0605:026 (2006). doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chatrchyan S et al (2012) Measurement of the rapidity and transverse momentum distributions of \(Z\) Bosons in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV. Phys Rev D 85:032002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.032002

  9. ATLAS Collaboration (2013) Example ATLAS tunes of Pythia8, Pythia6 and Powheg to an observable sensitive to \(Z\) boson transverse momentum. Technical Report ATL-PHYS-PUB-2013-017, CERN, Geneva, Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chatrchyan S et al (2014) Measurement of four-jet production in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 7 TeV. Phys Rev D 89:092010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.092010

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Corke R, Sjöstrand T (2011) Interleaved parton showers and tuning prospects. JHEP 03:032. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2011)032

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pumplin J et al (2002) New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis. JHEP 0207:012. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/012

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gieseke S et al (2011) Herwig++ 2.5 Release Note. hep-ph/1102.1672

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gieseke S et al (2012) Colour reconnections in Herwig++. Eur Phys J C 72:2225. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2225-5

  15. Sherstnev A, Thorne RS (2008) Parton distributions for LO generators. Eur Phys J C 55:553–575. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0610-x

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gleisberg T et al (2009) Event generation with SHERPA 1.1. JHEP 02:007 (2009). doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/02/007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lai H et al (2010) New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys Rev D 82:074024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074024

  18. Chatrchyan S et al (2012) Inclusive \(b\)-jet production in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV. JHEP 1204:084. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2012)084

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. CMS Collaboration (2014b) Measurement of azimuthal correlations between forward and central jets in proton proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV. (CMS-PAS-FSQ-12-008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Badger S et al (2013) Numerical evaluation of virtual corrections to multi-jet production in massless QCD. Comput Phys Commun 184:1981–1998. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.018

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berger CF et al (2008) An automated implementation of on-shell methods for one-loop amplitudes. Phys Rev D 78:036003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.036003

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung H et al (2010) The CCFM Monte Carlo generator CASCADE version 2.2.03. Eur Phys J C70:1237–1249. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1507-z

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Gunnellini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gunnellini, P. (2016). Cross Section Measurement of the 4j and 2b2j Channels and Comparisons with Predictions. In: Study of Double Parton Scattering Using Four-Jet Scenarios. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22213-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics