Advertisement

Contribution of Computing Services to Benchmarking Asset Management Knowledge Management

  • Anna Wiewiora
  • Kerry Brown
  • Javier TafurEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 222)

Abstract

Asset management has broadened from a focus on maintenance management to whole of life cycle asset management requiring a suite of new competencies from asset procurement to management and disposal. Well-developed skills and competencies as well as practical experience are a prerequisite to maintain capability, to manage demand as well to plan and set priorities and ensure on-going asset sustainability. This paper has as its focus to establish critical understandings of data, information and knowledge for asset management along with the way in which benchmarking these attributes through computer-aided design may aid a strategic approach to asset management. The paper provides suggestions to improve sharing, integration and creation of asset-related knowledge through the application of codification and personalization approaches.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi, M., Kayworth, T., Leidner, D.: An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(3), 191–224 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amadi-Echendu, J., Willett, R.J., Brown, K.A., Lee, J., Mathew, J., Vyas, N., Yang, B.-S.: What is engineering asset management? In: Proceedings 2nd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and the 4th International Conference on Condition Monitoring, Harrogate, United Kingdom, pp. 116–129 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Arif, M., Egbu, C., Alom, O., Khalfan, M.M.: Measuring knowledge retention: a case study of a construction consultancy in the UAE. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 16(1), 92–108 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskarada, S.: Information Quality Management Capability Maturity Model, Vieweg+Teubner Research (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R.E.: Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (Revised ed.). Jossey-Bass Inc. Pub., San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Cato, W.W., Mobley, R.K.: Computer-Managed Maintenance Systems. Elsevier Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Chui, M., Miller, A., Roberts, R.P.: Six ways to make Web 2.0 work. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1–7, February 2009Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, L.P.: A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: a practitioner perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20(1), 117–140 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davenport, Thomas H., Prusak, Laurence: Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Denison, D.R., Spreitzer, G.M.: Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development 5(1), 1–21 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. Dilnutt 2000; Robbins et al. 2000; Sveiby 2001 in: James P (2005): Knowledge asset management — the strategic management and knowledge management nexus, DBA thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSWGoogle Scholar
  12. Goh, S.C.: Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management 6(1), 23–30 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hackett 2001; Leonard-Barton 1998; Robbins et al. 2000; Sveiby 2001 in: James P (2005): Knowledge asset management — the strategic management and knowledge management nexus, DBA thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSWGoogle Scholar
  14. INGENIUM: International Infrastructure Management Manual, Association of Local Government Engineering NZ Inc., Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, New Zealand (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Jolicoeur, P.W., Barrett, J.T.: Coming of age: Strategic asset management in the municipal sector. Journal of Facilities Management 3(1), 41–52 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., Held, C.: The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 8(1), 33–44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koronios, A., Lin, S., Gao, J.: A data quality model for asset management in engineering organisations. In: Paper presented at the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Mathew, A.D., Ma, L., Hargreaves, D.J.: Understanding data management in asset management: a survey. In: Gao, J., Lee, J., Ni, J., Ma, L., Mathew, J.: Proceedings World Congress for Engineering Asset Management, Beijing, China, pp. 1096–1107 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Mintzberg, H.: The nature of managerial work: Harper & Row (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, G.D.: Using Web 2.0 tools to facilitate knowledge transfer in complex organisational environments — a primer. In: Paper presented at the ICOMS Asset Management Conference: Maintenance and Beyond, Adelaide (2010)Google Scholar
  21. Murphy, G.D., Chang, A.: A capability maturity model for data acquisition and utilisation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Maintenance Societies, Sydney, June 1–4, 2009Google Scholar
  22. Murphy, G.D., Salomone, S.: Using social media to facilitate knowledge transfer in complex engineering environments: a primer for educators. European Journal of Engineering Education 38(1), 70–84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell, S., Goussevskaia, A., Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Obembe, A.: Interdependencies in Complex Project Ecologies: The Case of Biomedical Innovation. Long Range Planning 41(1), 33–54 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nonaka, I.: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5(1) (1994)Google Scholar
  25. O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, 16–37, March 2007Google Scholar
  26. Schneider, J., Gaul, J., Neumann, C., Hografer, J., Wellbow, W., Schwan, M., Schnettler, A.: Asset management techniques. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 28(9), 643 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. The Institute of Asset Management: Asset Management — an anatomy. The Institute of Asset Management, Bristol (2011)Google Scholar
  28. Wiewiora, A., Murphy, G.: Unpacking ‘lessons learned’: investigating failures and considering alternative solutions. Journal of Knowledge Management & Practice (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Wiewiora, A.: The Role of Organisational Culture, Trust and Mechanisms in Inter-Project Knowledge Sharing. Ph.D thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  30. Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G.D., Liang, C.: Barriers to effective knowledge transfer in project-based organisations. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Global Innovation in Construction Proceedings, September 13–16, 2009. Loughborough University, Holywell Park (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of ManagementCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.ESCP EUROPE Business SchoolMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations