The STUDENTSCALE: Measuring Students’ Motivation, Interest, Learning Resources and Styles

  • Rui MoreiraEmail author
  • Cláudia Seabra
  • José Luís Abrantes
  • Belmiro Rego
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 222)


It becomes important to consider the role of Information Technologies (IT) in society and at school, including its impact on the teaching-learning process transformation. The use of IT should be done in an integrated and inclusive way, it is critical to teach how to use, consume and interact with technology. This study intends to contribute to a more depth understanding of the IT impact in the teaching-learning process. Our main goal is to create a scale to measure the Subjects’ Interest and Motivation, Motivation and Involvement with Learning Resources and Learning Styles. Those are important factors that impact on students’ Learning Performance. Insights from an empirical study of 357middle education students indicate that this multi-dimensional scale incorporates the following constructs: a) Interest and Motivation, b) Motivation and Involvement with IT’s Learning Resources, c) Motivation and Involvement with Teachers’ Learning Resources, and d) Non Literary Learning Styles. Discussion centers on this scale implications for theory development and management decisions. Teachers’ and schools’ managers may better understand the learning resources and styles preferred by students, and thus to create more motivational learning programs. Directions for future research are also presented.


Pedagogy Student behavior Learning resources Learning styles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamsom, C.: Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal 32(1), 33–43 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Abrantes, J., Seabra, C., Lages, L.: Major determinants of students’ perceived learning: Pedagogical affect, student interest and learning performance. Journal of Business Research 60(9), 960–964 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.: An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science 26, 147–179 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J., Gerbing, D.: Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 411–423 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R.: Causal models in marketing. John Wiley, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  6. Berndt, T., Keefe, K.: Friends’ influence on adolescents’ perceptions of themselves at school. In: Meece, D.H. (ed.) Student Perceptions in the Classroom, pp. 51–73. LEA, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  7. Berry, L.: Our roles as educator: Present and future. Journal of Marketing Education 15, 3–8 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridges, E.: Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education 21(1), 51–59 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brokaw, A.: The effects of students’ behaviour and preferred learning style on performance. Journal of Business Research 1, 44–53 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. Brokaw, A., Merz, T.E.: The effects of student behavior and preferred learning style performance. Journal of Business Education, 44–53 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Clarke III, I., Flaherty, T.B., Mottner, S.: Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education 23(3), 169–177 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, R., Auken, S.M.: Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude toward the major. Journal of Marketing Education 22(2), 147–154 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, R., Misra, S., Van Auken, S.: Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude towards the major. Journal of Marketing Education 22, 147–154 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, R., Griggs, S.: Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and clousing adolescents. Praeger, Westport (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Dunn, R., Giannitti, M., Murray, J., Rossi, I.: Grouping students for instruction: Effects of learning style on achievement and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 130, 485–494 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodenow, C.: Strengthening the links between educational psychology and the study of social contexts. Educational Psychologist 27, 177–196 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodenow, C., Grady, K.E.: The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. Journal of Experimental Education 62(1), 60–71 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamer, L.: The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education 22(1), 25–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M., Peltier, J., Drago, W.: Interaction and virtual learning. Strategic Change 13(4), 193–204 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Honey, P., Mumford, A.: The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, Berkshire (1992)Google Scholar
  22. Hsu, C.: Learning styles of hospitality students: Nature or nurture. Hospitality Management 18(3), 17–30 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt, L., Eagle, L., Kitchen, P.: Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match? Journal of Marketing Education 26(1), 75–88 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, D., Johnson, R.: Learning together and alone. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  25. Jöreskog, K., Sorbom, D.: LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, Chicago (1996)Google Scholar
  26. Kolb, D.: Learning styles and disciplinary differences. California Mangement Review 18(3), 22–31 (1988)Google Scholar
  27. Lashinger, H.K., Boss, M.W.: Learning styles and nursing students and career choices. Journal of Advanced Nursing 9, 375–380 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leung, D.Y., Kember, D.: The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology 23(1), 61–71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowman, J., Mathie, V.: What should graduate teaching assistants know about teaching? Teaching of Psychology 29(2), 84–88 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGrath, C.: A new voice on interchange: Is it talking or writing? Implications for the teaching literature. Journal of Educational Techonology Systems 26, 291–297 (1997-1998)Google Scholar
  31. McNeilly, K., Ranney, F.: Combining writing and electronic media in sales management courses. Journal of Marketing Education 20(fall), 226–235 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mialaret, G.: Psicopedagogia. Dom Quixote, Lisboa (1992)Google Scholar
  33. Palincsar, A., Brown, A.: Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monioring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1, 117–175 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peltier, J.W., Drago, W., Schibrowsky, J.A.: Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 25, 260–276 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prelow, H.M., Loukas, A.: The role of resource, protective, and risk factors on academic achievement-related outcomes of economically disadvantaged Latino Youth. Journal of Community Psychology 31(5), 513–529 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogoff, B.: Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  37. Slavin, R.: Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1990)Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L.: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E. (eds.) Harvard University, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  39. Webster, J., Hackley, P.: Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal 40(6), 128 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiner, J.: Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5, 360–364 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, M.: The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education 27(1), 25–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Young, M., Klemz, B., Murphy, J.: Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behaviour. Journal of Marketing Education 25(2), 130–142 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Moreira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cláudia Seabra
    • 1
  • José Luís Abrantes
    • 1
  • Belmiro Rego
    • 1
  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute of ViseuViseuPortugal

Personalised recommendations