Abstract
As pointed out by St. Augustine we cannot give a proper definition of time as such. Furthermore, conceiving time as a literal object would be highly problematic. It is, however, possible to establish a conceptual framework for meaningful discussion of the temporal aspects of reality in terms of the philosophical logic of time developed by Arthur Norman Prior. This framework is based on the view that John McTaggart’s A-language is more fundamental than the B-language. Prior’s view can be seen as based on some important properties of human experiences of time, and it involves the claim that it is useful to study the temporal aspects of reality in terms of so-called branching time models. This can in fact be done in several ways. It turns out that some of the most attractive and richest theories based on the ideas of branching time may be seen as formalisations of medieval and other early suggestions made by scholars such as William of Ockham and Luis de Molina. The tense-logical formalism appears to be useful wherever it is important to reason strictly regarding the temporal aspects of reality. Prior’s approach gives rise to a formal language which is relevant in the context of Julius T. Frazer’s hierarchical understanding of time as such and in the study of time in general. It offers a very powerful way to deal with time in a conceptually consistent, systematic and precise manner.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Augustine, Saint. 1955. Confessions. Trans. and ed. Albert C. Outler. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/Augustine/Confessions. Accessed 6 July 2014.
Belnap, Nuel, Michael Perloff, and Ming Xu. 2001. Facing the future: Agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Molina, Luis. 1988. On divine foreknowledge Trans. Alfred J. Freddoso. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Frazer, Julius T. 1978. The individual and society. In The study of time III, ed. Julius T. Frazer, N. Lawrence, and D. Park, 419–442. New York: Springer.
Jakobsen, David. 2013. Arthur Norman Priors bidrag til metafysikken, Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University.
McTaggart, John M.E. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17: 456–473.
Mumford, Lewis. 2010. Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (First published in 1934).
Øhrstrøm, Peter. 2011. Towards a common language for the discussion of time based on Prior’s tense logic. In Multidisciplinary aspects of time and time perception, ed. Argiro Vatakis, Anna Esposito, Maria Giagkou, Fred Cummins, and Georgios Papadelis, 46–57. Berlin: Springer.
Øhrstrøm, Peter, and Per Hasle. 1995. Temporal logic: From ancient ideas to artificial intelligence. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ploug, Thomas, and Peter Øhrstrøm. 2012. Branching time, indeterminism and tense logic. Synthese 188(3): 367–379.
Pnueli, Amir. 1977. The temporal logic of programs. In Proceeding SFCS ‘77: Proceedings of the 18 th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 46–57. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Prior, Arthur N. 1957. Time and modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, Arthur N. 1959. Thank goodness that’s over. Philosophy 34: 12–17.
Prior, Arthur N. 1967. Past, present and future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, Arthur N. 1972. The notion of the present. In The study of time, ed. Julius T. Fraser, F.C. Haber, and C.H. Müller, 320–323. Berlin: Springer.
Prior, Arthur N. 1996a. A statement on temporal realism. In Logic and reality: Essays on the legacy of Arthur Prior, ed. Jack Copeland, 45–46. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, Arthur N. 1996b. Some free thinking about time. In Logic and reality: Essays on the legacy of Arthur Prior, ed. Jack Copeland, 47–51. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, Arthur N. 2003. In Papers on time and tense, new edition, ed. Per Hasle, Peter Øhrstrøm, Torben Braüner, and Jack Copeland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
William of Ockham. 1969. Predestination, God’s foreknowledge, and future contingents Trans. Marilyn McCord Adams and Norman Kretzmann. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Øhrstrøm, P. (2016). The Concept of Time: A Philosophical and Logical Perspective. In: Mölder, B., Arstila, V., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds) Philosophy and Psychology of Time. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22195-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22195-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22194-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22195-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)