Abstract
When questioned, we are generally able to provide a coherent narrative regarding the order in which recent events happened. In considering this ability, many theorists have appealed to the idea that our perception of physical event timing might be related to the corresponding timing of neural events (i.e. brain time). However, a number of findings indicate that our perception does not slavishly follow from brain time, which might lead us to disregard the whole notion that the time of neural events is important. In this chapter we will suggest that this is premature. We will outline some simple models in which brain time matters, and discuss ways in which they would need to be developed to deal with the realities of our perceptual experiences. Our main point is not that these models are necessarily correct, but rather that theorists need to make alternative accounts similarly concrete and implementable before they will provide a compelling alternative.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We recognise that our choice of phrasing represents a mereological fallacy, but we find that the perceptual metaphor is instructive (because it is easy to grasp).
References
Aschersleben, Gisa. 2002. Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition 48: 66–79.
Burr, David, Ottavia Silva, Guido M. Cicchini, Martin S. Banks, and Maria C. Morrone. 2009. Temporal mechanisms of multimodal binding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 276: 1761–1769.
Cardoso-Leite, Pedro, Andrei Gorea, and Pascal Mamassian. 2007. Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: Evidence for a common processing system. Journal of Vision 7: 11.
Colonius, Hans, and Adele Diederich. 2004. Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: A time-window-of-integration model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1000–1009.
Dennett, Daniel C., and Marcel Kinsbourne. 1992. Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 183–247.
Dunlap, Knight. 1910. Reactions on rhythmic stimuli, with attempt to synchronize. Psychological Review 17: 399–416.
Eagleman, David M., and Terrence J. Sejnowski. 2000. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036–2038.
Ernst, Marc O., and Martin S. Banks. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429–433.
Fraisse, Paul. 1980. Les synchronisations sensori-motrices aux rythmes [The sensorimotor synchronization of rhythms]. In Anticipation et comportement, ed. Jean Requin, 233–257. Paris: Centre National.
Fredericksen, R. Eric, and Robert F. Hess. 1998. Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision. Vision Research 38: 1023–1040.
Fröhlich, Friedrich. 1923. Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58–78.
Fujisaki, Waka, Shin Shimojo, Makio Kashino, and Shin’ya Nishida. 2004. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience 7: 773–778.
Fujisaki, Waka, Anskar Koene, Derek Arnold, Alan Johnston, and Shin’ya Nishida. 2006. Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 273: 865–874.
Garcia-Perez, Miguel A., and Rocio Alcala-Quintana. 2012. Response errors explain the failure of independent-channels models of perception of temporal order. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 94.
Green, David M., and John A. Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hubel, David H. 1988. Eye, brain, and vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Jazayeri, Mehrdad, and J. Anthony Movshon. 2006. Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations. Nature Neuroscience 9: 690–696.
Jeffress, Lloyd A. 1948. A place theory of sound localization. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 41: 35.
Knill, David C., and Alexander Pouget. 2004. The bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences 27: 712–719.
Ley, Ian, Patrick Haggard, and Kielan Yarrow. 2009. Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35: 1005–1019.
Miller, Jeff, and Wolfgang Schwarz. 2006. Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: A diffusion model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32: 394–412.
Miyazaki, Makoto, Shinya Yamamoto, Sunao Uchida, and Shigeru Kitazawa. 2006. Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nature Neuroscience 9: 875–877.
Moutoussis, Konstantinos, and Semir Zeki. 1997. A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264: 393–399.
Nijhawan, Romi. 1994. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256–257.
Nishida, Shin’ya, and Alan Johnston. 2002. Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology 12: 359–368.
Paillard, Jacques. 1949. Quelques données psychophysiologiques relatives au déclenchement de la commande motrice [Some psychophysiological data relating to the triggering of motor commands]. L’Année Psychologique 48: 28–47.
Phillips, Ian. 2014. The temporal structure of experience. In Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality, ed. Valtteri Arstila and Dan Lloyd, 139–158. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Roach, Neil W., James Heron, David Whitaker, and Paul V. McGraw. 2011. Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 278: 1314–1322.
Roseboom, Warrick, Shin’ya Nishida, Waka Fujisaki, and Derek H. Arnold. 2011. Audio-visual speech timing sensitivity is enhanced in cluttered conditions. PLoS ONE 6: e18309.
Ross, John, Maria C. Morrone, Michael E. Goldberg, and David C. Burr. 2001. Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences 24: 113–121.
Scheier, C.R., Romi Nijhawan, and Shin Shimojo. 1999. Sound alters visual temporal resolution. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40: S792.
Schneider, Keith A., and Daphne Bavelier. 2003. Components of visual prior entry. Cognitive Psychology 47: 333–366.
Stelmach, Lew B., and Christopher M. Herdman. 1991. Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17: 539–550.
Sternberg, Saul, and Ronald L. Knoll. 1973. The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In Attention and performance IV, ed. Sylvan Kornblum, 629–686. London: Academic.
Ulrich, Rolf. 1987. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception and Psychophysics 42: 224–239.
Van der Burg, Erik, David Alais, and John Cass. 2013. Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony. The Journal of Neuroscience 33: 14633–14637.
Van Santen, Jan P.H., and George Sperling. 1985. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2: 300–320.
Van Wassenhove, Virginie, Ken W. Grant, and David Poeppel. 2007. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia 45: 598–607.
Vroomen, Jean, Mirjam Keetels, Beatrice de Gelder, and Paul Bertelson. 2004. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 22: 32–35.
Whitney, David, and Ikuya Murakami. 1998. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1: 656–657.
Yarrow, Kielan, Patrick Haggard, Ron Heal, Peter Brown, and John C. Rothwell. 2001. Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity. Nature 414: 302–305.
Yarrow, Kielan, Helen Johnson, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2004. Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical efferent trigger. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 839–847.
Yarrow, Kielan, Louise Whiteley, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2006. Biases in the perceived timing of perisaccadic perceptual and motor events. Perception & Psychophysics 68: 1217–1226.
Yarrow, Kielan, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2010. Saccadic chronostasis and the continuity of subjective visual experience across eye movements. In Space and time in perception and action, ed. Romi Nijhawan and Beena Khurana, 149–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yarrow, Kielan, Nina Jahn, Szonya Durant, and Derek H. Arnold. 2011. Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Consciousness and Cognition 20: 1518–1531.
Yarrow, Kielan, Ingvild Sverdrup-Stueland, Warrick Roseboom, and Derek H. Arnold. 2013. Sensorimotor temporal recalibration within and across limbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39: 1678–1689.
Zeki, Semir, and Andreas Bartels. 1998. The asynchrony of consciousness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 265: 1583–1585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yarrow, K., Arnold, D.H. (2016). The Timing of Experiences: How Far Can We Get with Simple Brain Time Models?. In: Mölder, B., Arstila, V., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds) Philosophy and Psychology of Time. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22195-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22195-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22194-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22195-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)