Skip to main content

Classifying Stances of Interaction Posts in Social Media Debate Sites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing Theories and Methodologies (ICIC 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9226))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1547 Accesses

Abstract

Social media debate sites provide a rich collection of public opinions on various controversial issues. In an online debate, participants express their stances by replying directly to the main topic or indirectly to other participants. We observe that the majority of the posts in online debates are interaction posts. In this paper, we propose a new method for the task of stance classification of interaction posts in online debates. We mine the historical activities and textual content of posts to learn the relationships between participants in online debates. Then we build the interaction graph and develop a greedy algorithm to classify participants by stance. Empirical evaluation shows that our method performs better than the baseline methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.createdebate.com

References

  1. Sridhar, D., Getoor, L., Walker, M.: Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. In: ACL 2014, p. 109 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu, M., Yang, L., Jiang, J.: Modeling interaction features for debate side clustering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 873–878. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 529–535. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 869–875. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, Y., Wang, H., Zhai, C., Roth, D.: Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1642–1646. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yessenalina, A., Yue, Y., Cardie, C.: Multi-level structured models for document-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1046–1056. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bansal, M., Cardie, C., Lee, L.: The power of negative thinking: exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. In: COLING (Posters), pp. 15–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 327–335. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1, vol. 1, pp. 226–234. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats rule and dogs drool!: classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pp. 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pp. 116–124. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galley, M., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J., Shriberg, E.: Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 669. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abu-Jbara, A., Radev, D.: Subgroup detector: a system for detecting subgroups in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan, A., Abu-Jbara, A., Radev, D.: Detecting subgroups in online discussions by modeling positive and negative relations among participants. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 59–70. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study. Technical report (No. TR-00–043), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Golub, G.H., Reinsch, C.: Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numer. Math. 14(5), 403–420 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2(3), 27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rendl, F., Rinaldi, G., Wiegele, A.: Solving max-cut to optimality by intersecting semidefinite and polyhedral relaxations. Math. Program. 121(2), 307–335 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant Number 61472006), the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20130001110032) and the National Basic Research Program (973 Program No. 2014CB340405).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaosong Rong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rong, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, M. (2015). Classifying Stances of Interaction Posts in Social Media Debate Sites. In: Huang, DS., Jo, KH., Hussain, A. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Methodologies. ICIC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22186-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22186-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22185-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22186-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics